From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A15643E4E for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:58:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C124069F; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:58:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com (mail-lj1-f178.google.com [209.85.208.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B369F40295 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:24:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d718ee7344so4949941fa.2 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:24:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712903072; x=1713507872; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VWF2zMhJ95BfIb6i3EdBDUeouom7vcp8/7qZmz7mMDs=; b=aTUAyuxoklNf0aAxuIEsAgWHSkEoialud5UtV45OObsuQosruDCJnTC6UC9aCCVNLo ixB06defMHSW/fjRD4TyqtT7H60ZdJoJtCU9kTUo0RxGTHZm6861yLRa7ifHzXinRQ3g 9bD+K/l6M45d/9yybRYh3q5zGsFnKMkGEs6P0siwpk2RLTb5ILKDh2Kxzq6dPYIBb7G3 Or+2dbQU/FdV4fckj+DAqnSVgb5XpKa8f2+5FJF/3V7qDCy+Q6egaLgsFPh5I5il3yjh nOOAZfT+7Iu1rL2inm//Y6PKQowCq6l//EWPzuQGo5DDJWNVhgnX2Q2okYRv7l/NTL+a mSmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712903072; x=1713507872; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VWF2zMhJ95BfIb6i3EdBDUeouom7vcp8/7qZmz7mMDs=; b=q3IKF83y1Xo5NQ3XNjawF6V+d1NvFBHE8BZEJwpADrvP1YovEmKwMCjkfB7lN3UhR+ G4ZXNpRF2ZS1mbKaTu3WjSMxepht0hBPFKlloE8gHukdn66XD2FZKB9R15+0I4xZMWwe IMF9mFlI11Ndeaso+JzX4kOtAAb1PRDfYo4frSgvXtnJsm9vui6qkn0GPX8gDeYZ0HX9 AnCny6I2CA7fcGD4gfnFncij5g4dqe4Z/Gjqdxlh8ySjUD7SIZEfFkOokad6Hw1Oz4BR J6GWAUDnIIOgyE+J6dVRcu85R3J3USrZBDYzX8dUKSHdlghPJfVEbCrutillCnuxxk0e AnWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw11IrBRVdmaE7BK2g0VJo1yVvAC5yrFKGFAlGQrfaQfKATZaTu pBqCfBOuV9rUk/0Rm1CThmQIOsQ/p8s7faMo8wbncABKrDmjPMN0SLhOGzSZ+XEH2zj2jwbjRN6 5ZS9/pxhmg+JxFvAeuAwkgUix5HHsAace X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFM9UqZod6csaiWR6cyssDVWkDDQ1CYIGsxN2ak8IJqswC9XUanwjQV0wJpJgH6KiiKZlWgQZ/cUfZuHzT2mIE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:512:b0:2d6:8e54:80a1 with SMTP id o18-20020a05651c051200b002d68e5480a1mr1487000ljp.19.1712903071696; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:24:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hao wang Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:24:20 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Are there changes in testpmd? To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f90660615e0535c" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:58:46 +0200 X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000001f90660615e0535c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I have a pmd that I am upstreaming to DPDK and currently testing. When I use testpmd to test my pmd, I found that my pmd could trx in DPDK 23.07, but it cannot in DPDK 23.11. After comparing the atlantic pmd between DPDK 23.07 and 23.11, I see nearly no changes. I see the testpmd difference between DPDK 23.07 and DPDK 23.11 and think these changes will not cause the problem. But when I use pktgen to test the pmd, it's ok. Any suggestions? Thank you very much! --0000000000001f90660615e0535c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have a pmd that I am upstreaming to DPDK and currently t= esting. When I use testpmd to test my pmd, I found that my pmd could trx in= DPDK 23.07, but it cannot in DPDK 23.11. After comparing the atlantic pmd = between DPDK 23.07 and 23.11, I see nearly no changes. I see the testpmd di= fference between DPDK 23.07 and DPDK 23.11 and think these changes will not= cause the problem.

But when I use pktgen to test the pmd, it&= #39;s ok.

Any=C2=A0suggestions?

Thank you very much!
--0000000000001f90660615e0535c--