From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A7043E73 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:22:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08EA40293; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:22:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-f173.google.com (mail-lj1-f173.google.com [209.85.208.173]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0A7400EF for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:22:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d88a869ce6so31745801fa.3 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:22:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713147739; x=1713752539; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yq5QXS3bfeHmwOTxDCminj4E9o/JukpnCz1qnq8Ri8U=; b=aBV8yd5UJiijdXyl6rD/gxz5EV1Yg9Qf3ZuXqny8vmVgE5C0znPLUnoj67rrW8jVVq +r9S2OsVSxzmcUCTtkvWvClFfGHcHlSRPnh8zXVeTVZPXGaNHin7arIWxV+SfejrME/C pYBlR1qm5TYeyEgVA1hF5jkWLnmgijSKzOjE/WqA72AKV9Zhd10knyzeESxVcjCSLxeh hxUoiEVGO10T53wUS6DMaHXSnJZCAby5QVwIzteGe3MA04mgFeXpfRP+0PpaVjS1kdNN 879VmgcJUi//o4C8M0A6PW3jjopW25xhfGDQp+AHgjMdO9nZMOnqox/kvRS+hOJOh9gg vJdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713147739; x=1713752539; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yq5QXS3bfeHmwOTxDCminj4E9o/JukpnCz1qnq8Ri8U=; b=TCCRH54t9JBr4u2g/3bYXniSlIz5vvsp6I0qTf38E6YSD9CvlN2QH2Daz8/ksRziEM 3foXfartaas0J39QMtMdcdwEaJig5WJPyC4aZYCWwgL9p9GQpcvqpXKYS1Y1hnAZET6e Q67RkVurcwI6fsQ5bsri7TTt0mdySoqjYM18ZpCG8b+mulTOU4M/3dmwwWGPZCi+AFkX 9rpd4Ga06MtNseZaocd3xyEY1tqHD3uKTjgk49BKYmsev/ZDjCFoGbA9dA15qApZ7MlI l222TTMdLCZs3V76cIbvrBNfmIAGtBAA5wGbK8u9zKRfIRe3935QfdQGKai2RxsVLf5z nuZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw8mFEHIV9phzE9KGum3RahH2AWVVQWVF2/0eU7RaaGhpikbCUM EBcaYrFckz4CNnsRJG2NJmZsPJSyLIwIBqueAaxKMobSkjUC17iN9zWst5/7ZG0pvAppNJhRNeF wPSmcpvZFd+H8jDsH2cW1KfP3Q9Fp0k6J X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGMagoLmZFG8OGQ3w9+aTadtRmTImxspLtycpDQdT/dWqcvg/uDqzKKUbXfH3xmVdW5eqMVLIsYoPeoVfz7Xko= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:905a:0:b0:2d8:3fc0:db5c with SMTP id n26-20020a2e905a000000b002d83fc0db5cmr6464528ljg.20.1713147738902; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:22:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9ec11232-4fe9-485c-98e1-d01d333a9c2e@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <9ec11232-4fe9-485c-98e1-d01d333a9c2e@amd.com> From: hao wang Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:22:07 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cannot trx when use testpmd To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cd6770616194a45" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000006cd6770616194a45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear ferruh, I am currently engaged in working on the Realtek R8125 and R8126 projects. Should I manage to overcome the current issue, I intend to contribute my PMD upstream for inclusion in the v24.07 release. In the meantime, I will continue to delve deeper into the debugging process in order to gather more specific and pertinent details. Thank you very much. Hao Ferruh Yigit =E4=BA=8E2024=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8812=E6= =97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=94 19:01=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On 4/12/2024 8:51 AM, hao wang wrote: > > I have a pmd that I am upstreaming to DPDK and currently testing. When = I > > use testpmd to test my pmd, I found that my pmd could trx in DPDK 23.07= , > > but it cannot in DPDK 23.11. After comparing the atlantic pmd between > > DPDK 23.07 and 23.11, I see nearly no changes. I see the testpmd > > difference between DPDK 23.07 and DPDK 23.11 and think these changes ma= y > > not cause the problem. > > > > But when I use pktgen to test the pmd, it's ok. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > > > Hi Hao, > > I am not aware of any known issues in testpmd that may cause this > specific problem. > And without more details it is not possible to know what the issue is. > > What is the PMD you are working on? Are you planning to upstream it for > v24.07 release? > > > Also I assume you are checking 'atlantic' driver code only as sample, is > this correct? > > > Thanks, > ferruh > > --0000000000006cd6770616194a45 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear ferruh,

I am = currently engaged in working on the Realtek R8125 and R8126 projects. Shoul= d I manage to overcome the current issue, I intend to contribute my PMD ups= tream for inclusion in the v24.07 release. In the meantime, I will continue= to delve deeper into the debugging process in order to gather more specifi= c and pertinent details.

Thank you = very much.

Hao

Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> =E4=BA=8E2024=E5=B9= =B44=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E4=BA=94 19:01=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A=
On 4/12/2024 8:= 51 AM, hao wang wrote:
> I have a pmd that I am upstreaming to DPDK and currently testing. When= I
> use testpmd to test my pmd, I found that my pmd could trx in DPDK 23.0= 7,
> but it cannot in DPDK 23.11. After comparing the atlantic pmd between<= br> > DPDK 23.07 and 23.11, I see nearly no changes. I see the testpmd
> difference between DPDK 23.07 and DPDK 23.11 and think these changes m= ay
> not cause the problem.
>
> But when I use pktgen to test the pmd, it's ok.
>
> Any=C2=A0suggestions?
>
>

Hi Hao,

I am not aware of any known issues in testpmd that may cause this
specific problem.
And without more details it is not possible to know what the issue is.

What is the PMD you are working on? Are you planning to upstream it for
v24.07 release?


Also I assume you are checking 'atlantic' driver code only as sampl= e, is
this correct?


Thanks,
ferruh

--0000000000006cd6770616194a45--