From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
To: Tony Hart <tony.hart@domainhart.com>, "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: Performance of CX7 with 'eth' pattern versus 'eth/ipv4' in hairpin
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:10:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR12MB5184B28F765CCE79A70299EBD0D62@DM4PR12MB5184.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC6tBwzLT+s3NjTjbCCOgVwbh_3pbWR6o7BJ4FE5c4uwP_BeGA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tony,
Could you also try to test with:
1. QUEUE action instead of RSS and check 1 queue performance.
2. when trying to test IPv4 only case, try the following 3 commands with this order -
flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern end actions jump group 1 / end
flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern priority 1 eth / ipv6 / end actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end
flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern priority 1 eth / ipv4 / end actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end
BR. Bing
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Hart <tony.hart@domainhart.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 7:39 PM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: Performance of CX7 with 'eth' pattern versus 'eth/ipv4' in hairpin
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> I'm using a CX7 and testing hairpin queues. The test traffic is entirely
> IPv4+UDP with distributed SIP,DIP pairs and received packets are u-turned via
> hairpin in the CX7 (single 400G interface).
>
> I see different performance when I use a pattern of 'eth' versus 'eth/ipv4' in
> the hairpin flow entry. From testing it seems that specifying just 'eth' is
> sufficient to invoke RSS and 'eth/ipv4'
> should be equivalent since the traffic is all ipv4, but I'm getting ~104Gbps for
> the 'eth' pattern and ~124Gbps for 'eth/ipv4' pattern.
>
> Any thoughts on why there is such a performance difference here?
>
> thanks
> tony
>
> This is the 'eth' pattern testpmd commands flow create 0 ingress group 0
> pattern end actions jump group 1 / end flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern
> eth / end actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end
>
> The testpmd commands for 'eth/ipv4'
> flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern end actions jump group 1 / end flow
> create 0 ingress group 1 pattern eth / ipv4 / end actions count / rss queues 6 7
> 8 9 end / end
>
>
> This is the testpmd command line...
> dpdk-testpmd -l8-14 -a81:00.0,dv_flow_en=1 -- -i --nb-cores 6 --rxq 6 --txq 6
> --port-topology loop --forward-mode=rxonly --hairpinq 4 --hairpin-mode
> 0x10
>
> Versions
> mlnx-ofa_kernel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
> kmod-mlnx-ofa_kernel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
> mlnx-ofa_kernel-devel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
> ofed-scripts-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.x86_64
>
> DPDK: v24.03
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 11:39 Tony Hart
2024-06-26 12:10 ` Bing Zhao [this message]
2024-06-26 13:24 ` Tony Hart
2024-06-28 9:57 ` Tony Hart
2024-07-08 16:56 ` Bing Zhao
2024-07-08 20:19 ` Tony Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM4PR12MB5184B28F765CCE79A70299EBD0D62@DM4PR12MB5184.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=bingz@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony.hart@domainhart.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).