From: Rashi Agarwal <Rashi.Agarwal@mobileum.com>
To: Rajesh Kumar <rajeshthepro@gmail.com>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: CPU Affinity Not Working in RHEL8 with DPDK 20.05
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:28:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR14MB4862391AF2EAA3702B565D1F8DCD2@DM4PR14MB4862.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA+jREQkCD4kiVSBY6qG1G43xRhypwTufQ+dCpBsftm5tuuegA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3095 bytes --]
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for your response.
I appreciate the clarification regarding rte_eal_init() and core binding. I have some follow-up questions regarding the behaviour difference between RHEL7 and RHEL8.
1. Why does the same rte_eal_init() configuration behave differently on RHEL7 vs. RHEL8?
* In RHEL7, CPU binding works as expected, but in RHEL8, the application always binds to core 1. What could be causing this difference?
2. Process vs. DPDK Core Assignment:
* My goal is to assign DPDK to run on core 1 while the rest of the process threads are pinned using numactl.
* Does rte_eal_init() interfere with CPU affinity settings applied through numactl?
3. Effect of Not Specifying a Core in rte_eal_init():
* What happens if we don’t specify a core mask (-c option) during rte_eal_init()?
* Will DPDK inherit the core binding from numactl, or does it select cores dynamically?
4. Does rte_eal_init() override numactl settings?
* If numactl is used to pin the application to specific cores, does rte_eal_init() override that and reset core affinity?
Your insights on these questions would be very helpful. Thanks again for your time and support!
Regards,
Rashi Agarwal.
From: Rajesh Kumar <rajeshthepro@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 4:27 PM
To: Rashi Agarwal <Rashi.Agarwal@mobileum.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: CPU Affinity Not Working in RHEL8 with DPDK 20.05
Caution :External
Hi Rashi,
Please change the argument to rte_eal_init (), in your code, -c 0x2 will always bind it to 1st core . Change it to "-c", "0x30" for pinning core 4 and 5.
int dpdk_argc = 8; char *dpdk_argv[] = { procName, "-c", "0x2", "--no-huge", filePrefix ,"-m","64" , "--log-level=eal,8"};
Thanks,
-Rajesh
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:25 AM Rashi Agarwal <Rashi.Agarwal@mobileum.com<mailto:Rashi.Agarwal@mobileum.com>> wrote:
Hi DPDK Community,
I am facing an issue where CPU affinity is not working as expected in RHEL8 with DPDK 20.05, while it works fine in RHEL7.
Problem Statement:
• When running my program with numactl -C4,5 ./testRTE on RHEL7, the worker threads correctly bind to the assigned cores.
• However, on RHEL8, the worker threads always bind to core 1, ignoring the specified CPU set.
Environment Details:
* DPDK Version: 20.05.0
* OS: RHEL8 (Issue) | RHEL7 (Works Fine)
* CPU Affinity Tool: numactl -C
Sample Program: Attached
Observations:
* In RHEL7, worker threads correctly bind to cores specified using numactl -C.
* In RHEL8, the threads always bind to core 1, ignoring the CPU set.
* Could DPDK be overriding the CPU affinity in RHEL8?
Questions:
1. Is there any known change in CPU affinity handling between RHEL7 and RHEL8 affecting DPDK?
2. Does DPDK override thread affinity when rte_eal_init() is called?
3. Is there any workaround or EAL flag to ensure that CPU affinity is respected?
Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rashi Agarwal.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 16816 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 4:54 Rashi Agarwal
2025-02-26 10:56 ` Rajesh Kumar
2025-02-27 3:28 ` Rashi Agarwal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM4PR14MB4862391AF2EAA3702B565D1F8DCD2@DM4PR14MB4862.namprd14.prod.outlook.com \
--to=rashi.agarwal@mobileum.com \
--cc=rajeshthepro@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).