Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for your response.
I appreciate the clarification regarding
rte_eal_init() and core binding. I have some follow-up questions regarding the behaviour difference between RHEL7 and RHEL8.
Your insights on these questions would be very helpful. Thanks again for your time and support!
Regards,
Rashi Agarwal.
From: Rajesh Kumar <rajeshthepro@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 4:27 PM
To: Rashi Agarwal <Rashi.Agarwal@mobileum.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: CPU Affinity Not Working in RHEL8 with DPDK 20.05
Caution :External
Hi Rashi,
Please change the argument to rte_eal_init (), in your code, -c 0x2 will always bind it to 1st core . Change it to "-c", "0x30" for pinning core 4 and 5.
int dpdk_argc = 8; char *dpdk_argv[] = { procName, "-c", "0x2", "--no-huge", filePrefix ,"-m","64" , "--log-level=eal,8"};
Thanks,
-Rajesh
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:25 AM Rashi Agarwal <Rashi.Agarwal@mobileum.com> wrote:
Hi DPDK Community,
I am facing an issue where CPU affinity is not working as expected in RHEL8 with DPDK 20.05, while it works fine in RHEL7.
Problem Statement:
· When running my program with numactl -C4,5 ./testRTE on RHEL7, the worker threads correctly bind to the assigned cores.
· However, on RHEL8, the worker threads always bind to core 1, ignoring the specified CPU set.
Environment Details:
- DPDK Version: 20.05.0
- OS: RHEL8 (Issue) | RHEL7 (Works Fine)
- CPU Affinity Tool: numactl -C
Sample Program: Attached
Observations:
- In RHEL7, worker threads correctly bind to cores specified using numactl -C.
- In RHEL8, the threads always bind to core 1, ignoring the CPU set.
- Could DPDK be overriding the CPU affinity in RHEL8?
Questions:
- Is there any known change in CPU affinity handling between RHEL7 and RHEL8 affecting DPDK?
- Does DPDK override thread affinity when rte_eal_init() is called?
- Is there any workaround or EAL flag to ensure that CPU affinity is respected?
Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rashi Agarwal.