From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35FBA2EF6 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5448D1BFB8; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com (mail-ot1-f68.google.com [209.85.210.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924E91BF70 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:53:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id b2so33564579otq.10 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 09:53:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netgate.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mvA4DeuFJ8zn1ym/HJ2mIWJ9pQgg9YsLG0ZcuUX9oXs=; b=nLTFvbTRUnbWSmrYi1lSjVVJWYymFxEpy0mwkHqk0WeHJgftYAx7JzEQnprEK5fcm/ KW3pk3DO/+7oUgcJj7W6+KzNJGvG+yDnpg4uJB/JS5krFpv9s3VRP5dBbTtwh0GxGXiw FMCmtzXpc0SoEbyXU2HyPV58jc0/dpn4TqkEE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mvA4DeuFJ8zn1ym/HJ2mIWJ9pQgg9YsLG0ZcuUX9oXs=; b=mFP4nllxGfr19btbnchp4f1JBHYuZiNLpGVa1KdEXNHfqaJusJuN2DyegFhM5nApIi b7sMzUaDU69Rp7ly2Xaggk5A1HDQDGLuFfvCPYqpDY3MTlJOXww12e9sBlx2VlGZuvrv JXRgydJQP9ZNO+pZhy1feWjYDN7P957XqbQU5agC12EyCfgD1TlIVIZfpyM96LysG5jv 2Nd2QBBk3bCaxszPYgj7IkN0jljAorTyU+PwyyLkItFCvxiUUeauV2Fnz2u21aOPJheE PexyEusJi75VbC8QuY/WjUAPu7XFFBtdqi6H2es3lhWKeVdeKj23bH00O/Ei4rw++3DI G9Lw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXIJ5cw6WszzlVrYoY2kQag7snr3AtI0yj+aOVNKVld8s6wrs/z +uaCyHur/QAjAYhbpA6DcWXFXyGrYhI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySj4pl+hyZ72NxKm+9SCAzyqanRD77xATBUIJbqKKuFevaZ2t8Aju8itK2Ms/BgmiloS8i4w== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:61d3:: with SMTP id h19mr48638051otk.325.1568566408982; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1:c5ab:99a6:a05e:a99b:c013:5ac? ([2600:1:c5ab:99a6:a05e:a99b:c013:5ac]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d25sm412513oic.23.2019.09.15.09.53.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 09:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Jim Thompson X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102) In-Reply-To: <20FB3E84-A2E9-41A4-97AD-9E662F67B0D2@csie.io> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:53:26 -0500 Cc: users@dpdk.org, gadrenayan@gmail.com Message-Id: References: <20FB3E84-A2E9-41A4-97AD-9E662F67B0D2@csie.io> To: =?utf-8?B?5pu+5oe35oGp?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Using Realtek NIC with DPDK X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" You could write a PMD for the Realtek nic(s) of interest. There is netmap s= upport for some Realtek NICs, so it=E2=80=99s not likely to be impossible.=20= https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap/blob/master/sys/dev/netmap/if_re_netmap= .h > On Sep 15, 2019, at 11:13 AM, =E6=9B=BE=E6=87=B7=E6=81=A9 wr= ote: >=20 >=20 > There is no any other way that using DPDK unsupported NIC >=20 > You can find supported NICs in following link:=20 > http://core.dpdk.org/supported/ >=20 > The easiest way is using VMWare or Virtualbox virtualized NIC in guest OS >=20 >=20 >> From: Gadre Nayan >> To: users@dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-users] Using Realtek NIC with DPDK >> Message-ID: >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"UTF-8" >>=20 >> Hi DPDK Users, >>=20 >> I have the following NIC on my DELL Laptop running Ubuntu OS >>=20 >> 07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. >> RTL8101/2/6E PCI Express Fast/Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 07) >> LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ >> DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- >>=20 >> I have 1 socket, 2 cores per socket and Hyperthreaded (2 logical cores pe= r Core) >>=20 >> Since DPDK doesn't support Realtek NICs, is there a way around ? >>=20 >> I was also referring to the mailing list and found a similar discussion: >> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2014-February/001384.html >>=20 >> I couldn't find a sample application which uses the software based >> PMDs to be treated as physical NICs. >>=20 >> Thanks >> ngadre. >>=20 >>=20 >> End of users Digest, Vol 202, Issue 6 >> *************************************