Re: [dpdk-users] How to getting first objects from a rte_mempool buffer every time?

["Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users [mailto:users-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ??
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 10:45 AM
> To: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-users] How to getting first objects from a rte_mempool buffer
> every time?
> 
> Hi all，

Hi Jie,


> I have a pcap file that contained 100 IP packets. I can send them by DPDK by
> below steps:
> 
> 1.     I create a rte_mempool buffer by rte_pktmbuf_pool_create. load these
> 100 packets into this buffer.
> 
> 2.     call rte_mempool_get_bulk to getting packets form rte_mempool buffer
> into rte_mbuf buffer,
> 
> 3.     put rte_mbuf buffer into rte_eth_tx_burst for sending .
> 
> The pcap packets can be sent out from 1 to 100  Ok.
> 
> Now I want to send the only first 10 packets every time,
> 
> rte_mempool_get_bulk can get 1-10 objects, but next time it will get 11-20
> objects.
> 
> I don’t know if there is easy way to getting first 10 objects from
> rte_mempool buffer every time?

The mempool data-structure is not designed for this usage.

If you require the first 10 items, I recommend dequeueing them from the
mempool once (as you have described above), and then caching them in another
data-structure to "loop" over them.

Typically an rte_ring would work well here, with the 10 items being dequeued
and re-enqueued over-and-over again to loop.


Note; when sending an mbuf via Ethdev, the refcount will be decremented,
and possibly the mbuf will be free()-ed and returned to the mempool.

If you wish to "keep" the mbuf in the rte_ring cache, consider incrementing
the refcount of the mbuf every time before you TX it - the result will be that
the mbuf is not freed back to the mempool, and remain valid to TX again.


> Thanks
> Jie

Hope that helps! -Harry