* [dpdk-users] question about implication of --no-shconf on sharing file descriptors
@ 2021-03-23 16:50 Thanos Makatos
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Thanos Makatos @ 2021-03-23 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: users
I'm looking at using the --in-memory option and from what I see it implies the --no-shconf option.
IIUC this memory will not be backed by a file, so there won't be file descriptor to pass to another process, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-03-23 16:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-23 16:50 [dpdk-users] question about implication of --no-shconf on sharing file descriptors Thanos Makatos
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).