* RE: conntrack not working in mlx5 [not found] <MW5PR22MB339565B04E50850FF0722063A7A09@MW5PR22MB3395.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> @ 2023-02-22 11:18 ` Bing Zhao 2023-02-22 12:39 ` Haider Ali 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Bing Zhao @ 2023-02-22 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Haider Ali, users; +Cc: Ori Kam, Slava Ovsiienko, Asaf Penso [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3892 bytes --] Hi Ali, Which DPDK version are you using? Could you try to use liberal mode firstly? Then the Seq/ACK/Win check will be ignored and only the state change will be tracked. Thanks From: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 10:05 PM To: users <users@dpdk.org>; Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: conntrack not working in mlx5 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Hi All, We were trying to test conntrack feature with testpmd, but we are not receiving any packets. Could you let us know the step which we are missing? Here are our test steps Step 1: Configuring conntract in testpmd: sudo ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 4,6 -a 04:00.0 --file-prefix=ha -- -i --rxq=16 --txq=16 --disable-rss set conntrack com peer 1 is_orig 1 enable 1 live 1 sack 1 cack 0 last_dir 0 liberal 0 state 1 max_ack_win 7 r_lim 5 last_win 510 last_seq 2632987379 last_ack 2532480967 last_end 2632987379 last_index 0x8 set conntrack orig scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2632987379 reply_end 2633016339 max_win 28960 max_ack 2632987379 set conntrack rply scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2532480967 reply_end 2532546247 max_win 65280 max_ack 2532480967 flow indirect_action 0 create ingress action conntrack / end flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions jump group 3 / end flow create 0 group 3 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions indirect 0 / jump group 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 1 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 2 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 4 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 8 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 16 / end actions queue index 5 / end start set verbose 1 Step 2: Sending scapy packet: We have tried multiple types of packets, but we were not able to see any packet in the testpmd sendp(Ether(dst="00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ff")/IP(ttl=0x25)/TCP(dport=123,window=510,flags=0x12,seq=2632987379,ack=2532480968 ),iface="enp4s0f0",count=1) sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x02, seq=100), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201)/"X", iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=103, ack=202), iface="enp4s0f0") >>> sendp(Ether()sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") Step 3: Checking counters stats: BEFORE sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 51 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 3986 rx_packets_phy: 55 rx_bytes_phy: 4242 rx_64_bytes_phy: 36 rx_prio0_bytes: 4242 rx_prio0_packets: 55 AFTER sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 52 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 4050 rx_packets_phy: 56 rx_bytes_phy: 4306 rx_64_bytes_phy: 37 rx_prio0_bytes: 4306 rx_prio0_packets: 56 Note: We also tried iperf3 traffic but no packets were seen in testpmd. Regards, Haider [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 15894 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: conntrack not working in mlx5 2023-02-22 11:18 ` conntrack not working in mlx5 Bing Zhao @ 2023-02-22 12:39 ` Haider Ali 2023-05-02 7:12 ` Haider Ali 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Haider Ali @ 2023-02-22 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bing Zhao, users; +Cc: Ori Kam, Slava Ovsiienko, Asaf Penso [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4850 bytes --] Hi Zhao, Kindly check below the dpdk and Mellanox Cx6 DX configurations [dpdk-22.11]$ cat VERSION 22.11.0 [dpdk-22.11]$ ethtool -i enp4s0f0np0 driver: mlx5_core version: 5.8-1.1.2 firmware-version: 22.35.2000 (MT_0000000436) I have tried with liberal mode, but nothing happened. One more thing is that we are not able to query conntrack stats via testpmd: testpmd> flow query 0 1 conntrack Cannot query action type 52 (CONNTRACK) Regards, Haider ________________________________ From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 4:18 PM To: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com>; users <users@dpdk.org> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: RE: conntrack not working in mlx5 Hi Ali, Which DPDK version are you using? Could you try to use liberal mode firstly? Then the Seq/ACK/Win check will be ignored and only the state change will be tracked. Thanks From: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 10:05 PM To: users <users@dpdk.org>; Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: conntrack not working in mlx5 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Hi All, We were trying to test conntrack feature with testpmd, but we are not receiving any packets. Could you let us know the step which we are missing? Here are our test steps Step 1: Configuring conntract in testpmd: sudo ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 4,6 -a 04:00.0 --file-prefix=ha -- -i --rxq=16 --txq=16 --disable-rss set conntrack com peer 1 is_orig 1 enable 1 live 1 sack 1 cack 0 last_dir 0 liberal 0 state 1 max_ack_win 7 r_lim 5 last_win 510 last_seq 2632987379 last_ack 2532480967 last_end 2632987379 last_index 0x8 set conntrack orig scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2632987379 reply_end 2633016339 max_win 28960 max_ack 2632987379 set conntrack rply scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2532480967 reply_end 2532546247 max_win 65280 max_ack 2532480967 flow indirect_action 0 create ingress action conntrack / end flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions jump group 3 / end flow create 0 group 3 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions indirect 0 / jump group 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 1 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 2 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 4 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 8 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 16 / end actions queue index 5 / end start set verbose 1 Step 2: Sending scapy packet: We have tried multiple types of packets, but we were not able to see any packet in the testpmd sendp(Ether(dst="00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ff")/IP(ttl=0x25)/TCP(dport=123,window=510,flags=0x12,seq=2632987379,ack=2532480968 ),iface="enp4s0f0",count=1) sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x02, seq=100), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201)/"X", iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=103, ack=202), iface="enp4s0f0") >>> sendp(Ether()sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") Step 3: Checking counters stats: BEFORE sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 51 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 3986 rx_packets_phy: 55 rx_bytes_phy: 4242 rx_64_bytes_phy: 36 rx_prio0_bytes: 4242 rx_prio0_packets: 55 AFTER sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 52 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 4050 rx_packets_phy: 56 rx_bytes_phy: 4306 rx_64_bytes_phy: 37 rx_prio0_bytes: 4306 rx_prio0_packets: 56 Note: We also tried iperf3 traffic but no packets were seen in testpmd. Regards, Haider [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 18170 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: conntrack not working in mlx5 2023-02-22 12:39 ` Haider Ali @ 2023-05-02 7:12 ` Haider Ali 2023-10-13 7:21 ` Haider Ali 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Haider Ali @ 2023-05-02 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bing Zhao, users; +Cc: Ori Kam, Slava Ovsiienko, Asaf Penso [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5235 bytes --] Hi Zhao, Is there any update? Regards, Haider ________________________________ From: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 5:39 PM To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>; users <users@dpdk.org> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: Re: conntrack not working in mlx5 Hi Zhao, Kindly check below the dpdk and Mellanox Cx6 DX configurations [dpdk-22.11]$ cat VERSION 22.11.0 [dpdk-22.11]$ ethtool -i enp4s0f0np0 driver: mlx5_core version: 5.8-1.1.2 firmware-version: 22.35.2000 (MT_0000000436) I have tried with liberal mode, but nothing happened. One more thing is that we are not able to query conntrack stats via testpmd: testpmd> flow query 0 1 conntrack Cannot query action type 52 (CONNTRACK) Regards, Haider ________________________________ From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 4:18 PM To: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com>; users <users@dpdk.org> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: RE: conntrack not working in mlx5 Hi Ali, Which DPDK version are you using? Could you try to use liberal mode firstly? Then the Seq/ACK/Win check will be ignored and only the state change will be tracked. Thanks From: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 10:05 PM To: users <users@dpdk.org>; Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: conntrack not working in mlx5 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Hi All, We were trying to test conntrack feature with testpmd, but we are not receiving any packets. Could you let us know the step which we are missing? Here are our test steps Step 1: Configuring conntract in testpmd: sudo ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 4,6 -a 04:00.0 --file-prefix=ha -- -i --rxq=16 --txq=16 --disable-rss set conntrack com peer 1 is_orig 1 enable 1 live 1 sack 1 cack 0 last_dir 0 liberal 0 state 1 max_ack_win 7 r_lim 5 last_win 510 last_seq 2632987379 last_ack 2532480967 last_end 2632987379 last_index 0x8 set conntrack orig scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2632987379 reply_end 2633016339 max_win 28960 max_ack 2632987379 set conntrack rply scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2532480967 reply_end 2532546247 max_win 65280 max_ack 2532480967 flow indirect_action 0 create ingress action conntrack / end flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions jump group 3 / end flow create 0 group 3 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions indirect 0 / jump group 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 1 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 2 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 4 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 8 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 16 / end actions queue index 5 / end start set verbose 1 Step 2: Sending scapy packet: We have tried multiple types of packets, but we were not able to see any packet in the testpmd sendp(Ether(dst="00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ff")/IP(ttl=0x25)/TCP(dport=123,window=510,flags=0x12,seq=2632987379,ack=2532480968 ),iface="enp4s0f0",count=1) sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x02, seq=100), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201)/"X", iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=103, ack=202), iface="enp4s0f0") >>> sendp(Ether()sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") Step 3: Checking counters stats: BEFORE sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 51 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 3986 rx_packets_phy: 55 rx_bytes_phy: 4242 rx_64_bytes_phy: 36 rx_prio0_bytes: 4242 rx_prio0_packets: 55 AFTER sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 52 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 4050 rx_packets_phy: 56 rx_bytes_phy: 4306 rx_64_bytes_phy: 37 rx_prio0_bytes: 4306 rx_prio0_packets: 56 Note: We also tried iperf3 traffic but no packets were seen in testpmd. Regards, Haider [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 19773 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: conntrack not working in mlx5 2023-05-02 7:12 ` Haider Ali @ 2023-10-13 7:21 ` Haider Ali 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Haider Ali @ 2023-10-13 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ori Kam, users; +Cc: matan, Slava Ovsiienko, khadem ullah [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5850 bytes --] Hi All, As the connection tracking is used with rte_flow, @Ori Kam<mailto:orika@nvidia.com> I have checked you are the Flow API maintainer. Could you please look into this issue? I have checked the DPDK's maintainers list, and found that Bing Zhao is not there now. Regards, Haider ________________________________ From: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:12 PM To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>; users <users@dpdk.org> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: Re: conntrack not working in mlx5 Hi Zhao, Is there any update? Regards, Haider ________________________________ From: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 5:39 PM To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>; users <users@dpdk.org> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: Re: conntrack not working in mlx5 Hi Zhao, Kindly check below the dpdk and Mellanox Cx6 DX configurations [dpdk-22.11]$ cat VERSION 22.11.0 [dpdk-22.11]$ ethtool -i enp4s0f0np0 driver: mlx5_core version: 5.8-1.1.2 firmware-version: 22.35.2000 (MT_0000000436) I have tried with liberal mode, but nothing happened. One more thing is that we are not able to query conntrack stats via testpmd: testpmd> flow query 0 1 conntrack Cannot query action type 52 (CONNTRACK) Regards, Haider ________________________________ From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 4:18 PM To: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com>; users <users@dpdk.org> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: RE: conntrack not working in mlx5 Hi Ali, Which DPDK version are you using? Could you try to use liberal mode firstly? Then the Seq/ACK/Win check will be ignored and only the state change will be tracked. Thanks From: Haider Ali <haider@dreambigsemi.com> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 10:05 PM To: users <users@dpdk.org>; Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com> Subject: conntrack not working in mlx5 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Hi All, We were trying to test conntrack feature with testpmd, but we are not receiving any packets. Could you let us know the step which we are missing? Here are our test steps Step 1: Configuring conntract in testpmd: sudo ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 4,6 -a 04:00.0 --file-prefix=ha -- -i --rxq=16 --txq=16 --disable-rss set conntrack com peer 1 is_orig 1 enable 1 live 1 sack 1 cack 0 last_dir 0 liberal 0 state 1 max_ack_win 7 r_lim 5 last_win 510 last_seq 2632987379 last_ack 2532480967 last_end 2632987379 last_index 0x8 set conntrack orig scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2632987379 reply_end 2633016339 max_win 28960 max_ack 2632987379 set conntrack rply scale 7 fin 0 acked 1 unack_data 0 sent_end 2532480967 reply_end 2532546247 max_win 65280 max_ack 2532480967 flow indirect_action 0 create ingress action conntrack / end flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions jump group 3 / end flow create 0 group 3 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions indirect 0 / jump group 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 1 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 2 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 4 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 8 / end actions queue index 5 / end flow create 0 group 5 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / conntrack is 16 / end actions queue index 5 / end start set verbose 1 Step 2: Sending scapy packet: We have tried multiple types of packets, but we were not able to see any packet in the testpmd sendp(Ether(dst="00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ff")/IP(ttl=0x25)/TCP(dport=123,window=510,flags=0x12,seq=2632987379,ack=2532480968 ),iface="enp4s0f0",count=1) sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x02, seq=100), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=101, ack=201)/"X", iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x10, seq=103, ack=202), iface="enp4s0f0") >>> sendp(Ether()sendp(Ether()/IP(src="192.168.0.2", dst="10.0.0.2")/TCP(sport=1024, dport=2048, flags=0x11, seq=102, ack=201), iface="enp4s0f0") Step 3: Checking counters stats: BEFORE sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 51 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 3986 rx_packets_phy: 55 rx_bytes_phy: 4242 rx_64_bytes_phy: 36 rx_prio0_bytes: 4242 rx_prio0_packets: 55 AFTER sending the packet $ ethtool -S enp4s0f0 NIC statistics: rx_vport_unicast_packets: 52 rx_vport_unicast_bytes: 4050 rx_packets_phy: 56 rx_bytes_phy: 4306 rx_64_bytes_phy: 37 rx_prio0_bytes: 4306 rx_prio0_packets: 56 Note: We also tried iperf3 traffic but no packets were seen in testpmd. Regards, Haider [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 23124 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-16 8:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <MW5PR22MB339565B04E50850FF0722063A7A09@MW5PR22MB3395.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
2023-02-22 11:18 ` conntrack not working in mlx5 Bing Zhao
2023-02-22 12:39 ` Haider Ali
2023-05-02 7:12 ` Haider Ali
2023-10-13 7:21 ` Haider Ali
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).