From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB7FA0093 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:44:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7E41C1E7; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:44:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com (mail-pg1-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09C71C1DC for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:44:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id f4so1918593pgi.10 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:44:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=H+x3YY2zrdzHVOn8vzrSGSt7fa9M4OUR0vbUwgPkSek=; b=im5m+YO+n+At1OgBYlO1/zScj8/Mci7LKH8cQK/JWnACb1eM0rERQL3X+DPLxTMi8V OVXhS4wn394mqLECvCEzoKZPpys2rPAQBhEpiSR9GqSWJOB6MmPqDKgafzjgtBbk3Qzk fXQUBPuCaPKXdMJqzyyxOAcyFnKxvL9l0/OKTRbL+IRU0XXXSMLZU8dxSU3uyvlNI02/ yGeuFbQgzcz4KVOwU4bmVVFmGEGIPTT5H/f710QCjslT3sVK6OFwuZ8afxNJ1WY5zI02 SEj9uGIfsY2NP+126CgKE2YgkhDt7YQddmDhaLgj/5hKfoJARMG9XUOTmGJgkjafL8Y9 K5mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=H+x3YY2zrdzHVOn8vzrSGSt7fa9M4OUR0vbUwgPkSek=; b=Tuxw/Fy5JOTI3yCPodpfqBDXmy4Vw8+lwKrMfDplAig2Vc3aDlrsOcphlVUmZZH991 VzBbDz7fsu39GL9tPQuRxs931pLFXv+TQtTG4nACSotsMry9G442qW6sZDC280sT5qEL eFyNIZJ5LXJRpBA2OtodC8mNr2eEvOCskYodHZsEw76vUsfuNRbRL/iFluQVmn92dTmu l/yTf+brTplZfN+hpUZeXISar1bko1OgiqWE6bftO9Nq8k9BQx0xh5vOanFWDPPaMNHE hbTzVcNluF7oGp/ZlisclHkd7yZtI3dc+8hxpYSJypYDGzgXWDdqqh4w9zj67fAndW1Z wRKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ECRy+nWAnWQKIPZI+fMsbaIf//71MdQuVCt8SINOjaKjunDsU su5yQS+VRDdeiZ8PYdmbM78= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwayB+qcBwEs58fBkczbXHpqPEXfboe0455anuG8AEpS3NTrbXAppz/Su+K31BUK1PiCZorsg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:780c:: with SMTP id t12mr5716416pfc.235.1590003851947; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sea-l-00003662.olympus.f5net.com (c-71-231-121-172.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.231.121.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z29sm2799886pff.120.2020.05.20.12.44.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 May 2020 12:44:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Vincent Li X-Google-Original-From: Vincent Li Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:43:50 -0700 (PDT) X-X-Sender: vli@sea-ml-00029224.olympus.f5net.com To: dave seddon cc: Pavel Vajarov , Stephen Hemminger , users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20200506075456.140625fb@hermes.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Peformance troubleshouting of TCP/IP stack over DPDK. X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On Thu, 7 May 2020, dave seddon wrote: > > We did the tests on Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.15.0-96-generic > > x86_64). > > The NIC was given to the guest using SR-IOV. I am curious how you get F-Stack working with KVM VM with SR-IOV. The author of F-Stack mentioned F-Stack not tested working for KVM VM. I had an issue report here: https://github.com/F-Stack/f-stack/issues/489