From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25876A04B1 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:06:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126C94C81; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:06:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com (mail-pj1-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F702B96 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:06:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id kx11so774794pjb.5 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 06:06:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=zU0rrC21rg5rfxLB/E0JsEQiZFkZfgO6m8rW/5W4Nks=; b=Im+WAYc88Dg665soBcQp1SBVs1ghfcp45Ut0OfCzbwj5njNe1uDtIvcXLhlm7MSJXs NO+oGcLeUZuIEqLmwbZ16dCAYK0H7YBnxzACK7inFIG94hZL9g5D4GZkOCNoTqceaE6i 0EIrE5PY1++//6y2BrWbJt7UFnueELsL9vGbr5K+utV0kICvs2eU6QBMxnZMGJVOapgr /ONpgBURU/m6IFtJjRbTiPXfaYLqLnukKDqUJIR4KpCv9ElOE4TCoqsZSrmEBBWVYpfV vQYYUhIIDiOKZ7rgMreQyIqLQ9K3Klm0jFaO3veGRT5gjkSMShjha4oRBA1DKzvhj31E uiiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=zU0rrC21rg5rfxLB/E0JsEQiZFkZfgO6m8rW/5W4Nks=; b=ZR3kKRmp0Pq+G7MV9SB1l1s14ERjGpa5zkRf6/vs+NXGULKTgwFgMNWZ2FvgYFQxna h2MC4DhCSQJhLfKXr18Ub0ECod2kYddk3xlTHlbpCYb7E8roOuXpUcQAbQ12zmuUZAdO P/0Gg+XfZuoThce2XSJEQRT7BZoYMCgoP/+NQnIgPIhg4jzWEY0tP6is+IxHJxQxypUM iGW7CRZno7vPErnkz01rZz3Um5WTIyRUAykGNV2l7u4NRPzE0ltnTdUkJjmV8ED8cL56 t0fTm3k4No71H7HzBuTyKIZm7fYPP6fFl/HK9A6WhK12zVQokbbpq5OiCrRCx7Jo6yFy dDoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BfoHDWleQTIWLEKULf7ohdtPdA+wSIs57mok+cZCJrapAvVZe HSJ13OVkO3kwuDxjbmOMZKOthqenLx3ZEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1HeJvrhzsCxaKnjn4gI7cwyeJqGSPm7I987/1qAqftI6TEL9Dcl7zDydLjTdhBnemF7Sjjw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6945:: with SMTP id j5mr1096672pjm.76.1598360790754; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 06:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2406:3003:2005:20c2:74c5:461:4673:5a01? ([2406:3003:2005:20c2:74c5:461:4673:5a01]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm11390682pgq.33.2020.08.25.06.06.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 06:06:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Alireza Sanaee To: "users@dpdk.org" Cc: Erez Ferber References: <767cf587-90b4-2eab-bd0d-667b862b50e8@gmail.com> <6de96a98-c4c8-46c7-07b2-bc37922433f2@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:06:28 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6de96a98-c4c8-46c7-07b2-bc37922433f2@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Low throughput when pushing multiple priorities within a VLAN X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, We have examined three NICs: Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family [ConnectX-5] Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 Family [ConnectX-4 Lx] Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection Our DPDK version is 20.05.0-rc0, Intel NIC works properly and doesn't show any throughput slow down, however, Mellanox NICs both show dramatic slow down for some reason. Thanks, Alireza On 8/25/20 8:42 AM, Alireza Sanaee wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is my NIC,  Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 > Family [ConnectX-4 Lx] > > Thanks, > Alireza > > On 8/25/20 3:17 AM, Erez Ferber wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Which NIC are you using ? >> >> Thanks, >> Erez >> >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 11:34 Alireza Sanaee > > wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> I'd like to push two flows with two different priorities from a >> NIC to >> >> the network. If I use same priority for my flows, they'll be >> pushed at >> >> the line rate. However, when I pick two different VLAN priorities, >> >> throughput reduces drastically. >> >> >> >> Is there anything wrong with my NIC configuration? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alireza >> >> >>