From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF20A04F2 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:48:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87B91BF9E; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:47:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E371BF88; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:47:54 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Dec 2019 02:47:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,284,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="362205089" Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.92]) ([10.237.220.92]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2019 02:47:51 -0800 To: Venumadhav Josyula Cc: Bruce Richardson , users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, Venumadhav Josyula References: <20191113091927.GA1501@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <70f4e9f0-70f7-aa4a-6c5d-c24308d196c2@intel.com> <3c014e01-3635-df19-a11c-2db09b03d423@intel.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:47:51 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] time taken for allocation of mempool. X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On 18-Nov-19 4:43 PM, Venumadhav Josyula wrote: > Hi Anatoly, > > After using iova-mode=va, i see my ports are not getting detected ? I > thought it's working but I see following problem > > what could be the problem? > i) I see allocation is faster > ii) But my ports are not getting detected > I take my word back that it entirely working.. > > Thanks, > Regards, > Venu > "Ports are not getting detected" is a pretty vague description of the problem. Could you please post the EAL initialization log (preferably with --log-level=eal,8 added, so that there's more output)? -- Thanks, Anatoly