DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-users] Integration from Dpdk18.05 to Dpdk19.11 - rte_timer_subsystem_init(void)
@ 2021-01-13  2:38 Li, Jiu (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
  2021-01-18  8:41 ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li, Jiu (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) @ 2021-01-13  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: users
  Cc: Dong, Shaojie (NSB - CN/Hangzhou), Ye, Hua (NSB - CN/Hangzhou),
	Alasaarela, Risto (Nokia - FI/Oulu),
	Jarvelaid, Rain (Nokia - FI/Oulu),
	Wu, Jianyue (NSB - CN/Hangzhou),
	Pan, Jianyong (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)

Hello!  Dpdk experts,

On Dpdk 18.05,  void rte_timer_subsystem_init(void)
On Dpdk 19.11,  int    rte_timer_subsystem_init(void) implementation changed, which will return 0, -EALREADY or -ENOMEM;

There is still have  dpdk "process" mode (instead of pdkd thread mode) deployment in my side.
Can I have a question?

If rte_timer_subsystem_init() is called one time is enough?
After rte_timer_subsystem_init() called with return 0 by one process , then other processes are able to use "rte timer" service without issue, right?

Thanks in advance!

Best Regards.
  U-Plane
(Clark),  Jiu LI


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-19 16:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-13  2:38 [dpdk-users] Integration from Dpdk18.05 to Dpdk19.11 - rte_timer_subsystem_init(void) Li, Jiu (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)
2021-01-18  8:41 ` David Marchand
2021-01-19 16:11   ` Carrillo, Erik G

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).