DPDK website maintenance
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: web@dpdk.org, yliu@fridaylinux.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC] Add LTS section on the roadmap page
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 13:05:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518181550.17920.9.camel@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610947.Pusgb9ZLHA@xps>

On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 21:42 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 08/02/2018 19:24, Luca Boccassi:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 18:21 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > > ---
> > >  dev/roadmap.html | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/dev/roadmap.html b/dev/roadmap.html
> > > index a2fea2f..c818bde 100644
> > > --- a/dev/roadmap.html
> > > +++ b/dev/roadmap.html
> > > @@ -111,5 +111,15 @@
> > >  		<li>Integration deadline: September 28, 2018
> > >  		<li>Release: November 2, 2018
> > >  	</ul>
> > > +	<h3 id="lts">LTS releases</h3>
> > > +	<p>LTS point releases follow mainline releases.
> > > +	<p>After each -rc tag and after the final version,
> > > relevant
> > > bug fixes get
> > > +        backported by the LTS maintainers into the respective
> > > branches.
> > > +	<p>Developers can provide LTS-specific patches by
> > > sending
> > > them to stable@dpdk.org
> > > +        only.
> > > +	<p>After all the relevant bugfixes have been backported,
> > > regression tests are ran,
> > > +        and if clear, the LTS is announced.
> > > +	<p>Typically a new LTS version follows a mainline
> > > release by
> > > 1-2 weeks, depending
> > > +        on the test results.
> > >  </section>
> > >  <footer></footer>
> > 
> > Thomas,
> > 
> > Is this what you had in mind? Let me know if there are any changes
> > you'd like.
> 
> You should talk about stable releases, LTS being some of them.
> 
> In current process, patches are applied in burst after -rc, right?
> I think this burst mode is important to highlight.
> 
> Please, could you add a roadmap for each branch?
> The roadmap could show EOL dates and the LTS ones.

See v2 - I added the mention of the EOL dates, but release dates are
not fixed in stone given they immediately follow the mainline releases.
How would you like to see it worded?

> > And also please test how it looks before applying :-)
> 
> You can test with "make".
> On my machine I use "make PYTHON2=python2".

Ah great, thanks for the tip.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-09 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-08 18:21 Luca Boccassi
2018-02-08 18:24 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-02-08 20:42   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-09 13:05     ` Luca Boccassi [this message]
2018-02-09 13:04 ` [dpdk-web] [RFC v2] " Luca Boccassi
2018-03-06 11:25   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-06 19:45     ` Luca Boccassi
2018-03-06 19:43   ` [dpdk-web] [RFC v3] " Luca Boccassi
2018-03-08 22:47     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1518181550.17920.9.camel@debian.org \
    --to=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=web@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).