From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: web@dpdk.org, yliu@fridaylinux.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [RFC] Add LTS section on the roadmap page
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 13:05:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518181550.17920.9.camel@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610947.Pusgb9ZLHA@xps>
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 21:42 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 08/02/2018 19:24, Luca Boccassi:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 18:21 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > > ---
> > > dev/roadmap.html | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/dev/roadmap.html b/dev/roadmap.html
> > > index a2fea2f..c818bde 100644
> > > --- a/dev/roadmap.html
> > > +++ b/dev/roadmap.html
> > > @@ -111,5 +111,15 @@
> > > <li>Integration deadline: September 28, 2018
> > > <li>Release: November 2, 2018
> > > </ul>
> > > + <h3 id="lts">LTS releases</h3>
> > > + <p>LTS point releases follow mainline releases.
> > > + <p>After each -rc tag and after the final version,
> > > relevant
> > > bug fixes get
> > > + backported by the LTS maintainers into the respective
> > > branches.
> > > + <p>Developers can provide LTS-specific patches by
> > > sending
> > > them to stable@dpdk.org
> > > + only.
> > > + <p>After all the relevant bugfixes have been backported,
> > > regression tests are ran,
> > > + and if clear, the LTS is announced.
> > > + <p>Typically a new LTS version follows a mainline
> > > release by
> > > 1-2 weeks, depending
> > > + on the test results.
> > > </section>
> > > <footer></footer>
> >
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Is this what you had in mind? Let me know if there are any changes
> > you'd like.
>
> You should talk about stable releases, LTS being some of them.
>
> In current process, patches are applied in burst after -rc, right?
> I think this burst mode is important to highlight.
>
> Please, could you add a roadmap for each branch?
> The roadmap could show EOL dates and the LTS ones.
See v2 - I added the mention of the EOL dates, but release dates are
not fixed in stone given they immediately follow the mainline releases.
How would you like to see it worded?
> > And also please test how it looks before applying :-)
>
> You can test with "make".
> On my machine I use "make PYTHON2=python2".
Ah great, thanks for the tip.
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-08 18:21 Luca Boccassi
2018-02-08 18:24 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-02-08 20:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-09 13:05 ` Luca Boccassi [this message]
2018-02-09 13:04 ` [dpdk-web] [RFC v2] " Luca Boccassi
2018-03-06 11:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-06 19:45 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-03-06 19:43 ` [dpdk-web] [RFC v3] " Luca Boccassi
2018-03-08 22:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1518181550.17920.9.camel@debian.org \
--to=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=web@dpdk.org \
--cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).