DPDK website maintenance
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org"
	<tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>, dpdk-web <web@dpdk.org>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] update of "Contribute" page
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:50:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1592346.d2LDZXDRUr@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANA499GTttjORJ_3XzMki7FcjXsL+CwT3pmfFpswX=29hsf17Q@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you


03/09/2019 22:46, Jill Lovato:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> Thanks for flagging. These updates have been made.
> 
> Regards,
> Jill
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 1:22 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 
> > Ping,
> > The changes below are waiting to be applied on the web site.
> > Thanks in advance for closing this item.
> >
> >
> > 11/08/2019 00:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm reviewing the web page and see some inconsistencies with what
> > > was written in this email thread, and I think about few improvements.
> > >
> > > Please check comments from John below about "Incoming", "opened"
> > > and "information" words, thanks.
> > >
> > > About the section listing the services, I was expecting a section title,
> > > like "Online Tools".
> > > I think you can replace "Email archives" with just "Emails".
> > > And instead of writing the URLs, it would be simpler to just keep the
> > > name of the service (Code, Repositories, Patches, Emails, Bugs)
> > > as the link itself. If you think of a better layout for this list,
> > > like buttons on a row, feel free.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > 07/08/2019 18:11, Jill Lovato:
> > > > Yes, we'll get these updates in.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks so much!
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 9:07 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 07/08/2019 17:50, Mcnamara, John:
> > > > > > > The collaboration is based on git and emails. Coming patches are
> > > > > listed in
> > > > > > > patchwork. Bugs are open in bugzilla. The Technical Board may
> > > > > intermediate
> > > > > > > in the development process, as described in the Technical Board
> > > > > operation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some minor proposed changes to this section as follows:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The collaboration is based on git and emails. Incoming patches are
> > > > > listed in
> > > > > > patchwork. Bugs are opened in bugzilla. The Technical Board may
> > > > > intermediate
> > > > > > in the development process, as described in the Technical Board
> > > > > operation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The main project has specific informations for contributors.
> > > > > > > Other projects have their own documentation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The singular "information" would be better here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Otherwise +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, thanks for the review John.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trishan, Jill, I think you can proceed with the above suggestions.
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: web [mailto:web-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > Monjalon
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 4:05 PM
> > > > > > > To: web@dpdk.org
> > > > > > > Cc: Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>;
> > > > > > > tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org
> > > > > > > Subject: [dpdk-web] update of "Contribute" page
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to propose an update of this page:
> > > > > > >     https://www.dpdk.org/contribute/
> > > > > > > It is supposed to be a welcome page for contributors of any DPDK
> > > > > project,
> > > > > > > not only the core one. So we can remove some redundancy with the
> > page
> > > > > > > about contributing to DPDK Core.
> > > > > > > One more change: we have a new code.dpdk.org service to
> > advertise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We can keep this introduction:
> > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > DPDK is an open source project, with the main code BSD licensed
> > and
> > > > > Linux
> > > > > > > kernel related parts are naturally licensed under the GPL. We
> > welcome
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > encourage anyone who is interested to contribute and participate
> > in the
> > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > The second part of the introduction requires some changes:
> > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > The collaboration is based on git and emails. Coming patches are
> > > > > listed in
> > > > > > > patchwork. Bugs are open in bugzilla. The Technical Board may
> > > > > intermediate
> > > > > > > in the development process, as described in the Technical Board
> > > > > operation.
> > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > The link on "git" must be changed to http://git.dpdk.org so
> > that it
> > > > > covers
> > > > > > > all repositories.
> > > > > > > The link on "emails" must be to the following section listing all
> > > > > mailing-
> > > > > > > lists.
> > > > > > > The link on "patchwork" must cover any possible new project:
> > > > > > > https://patches.dpdk.org The sentence about the roadmap is
> > removed
> > > > > because
> > > > > > > specific to Core.
> > > > > > > The link on "bugzilla" must cover all projects:
> > https://bugs.dpdk.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We should add a sentence to link to the "Contribute" page of the
> > Core
> > > > > > > project:
> > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > The main project has specific informations for contributors.
> > > > > > > Other projects have their own documentation.
> > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > with "informations for contributors" being a link to
> > > > > > > https://core.dpdk.org/contribute and "documentation" being a
> > link to
> > > > > > > https://www.dpdk.org/hosted-projects/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The next section "Get the Code" can be replaced by a list of
> > links to
> > > > > > > services available to the contributors:
> > > > > > >     - Code - code.dpdk.org
> > > > > > >     - Repositories - git.dpdk.org
> > > > > > >     - Patches - patches.dpdk.org
> > > > > > >     - Email archives - inbox.dpdk.org
> > > > > > >     - Bugs - bugs.dpdk.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The section "Mailing Lists" should stay as is.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The section "Ways to Contribute" is an old copy of the Core
> > project,
> > > > > so it
> > > > > > > should be completely removed from this general page.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any comment?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 






      reply	other threads:[~2019-09-03 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-07 15:04 Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-07 15:09 ` Trishan de Lanerolle
2019-08-07 15:34   ` Jill Lovato
2019-08-07 15:50 ` Mcnamara, John
2019-08-07 16:07   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-07 16:11     ` Jill Lovato
2019-08-10 22:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-09-03 20:21         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-09-03 20:46           ` Jill Lovato
2019-09-03 20:50             ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1592346.d2LDZXDRUr@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=jlovato@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=web@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).