From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F48EA04B1; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:18:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF10C8FA; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:18:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70310C8E6 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:18:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604488701; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1TaDI11HGlj0cI6MkZGsIH/p+Hi3OZwuXNHEvcuW70k=; b=XEdFaHIGO6Ec6fBxnfiK4fCCu4RzsWIZQIGuZ5Lh1DJHo5eE8uEUFFV9YOYwz9uJkymNcP ZT4rOei6FT3JpUmIZGEDKqEnJHoJ9GiCmsM4A6ZjONnwzHR1TFefjtoectEEef5gm3iVxr cW2RalOex7xIz0u/sppUc+7FiXoyfuY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-537-yh5g44qFPVWPfu5pKUNmKQ-1; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 06:18:19 -0500 X-MC-Unique: yh5g44qFPVWPfu5pKUNmKQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABA710A0B86; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.110.29] (unknown [10.36.110.29]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09EC85C1D0; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:18:16 +0000 (UTC) To: Thomas Monjalon , web@dpdk.org Cc: techboard@dpdk.org References: <20201104111226.2247113-1-thomas@monjalon.net> From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: <16195b56-4815-b7cd-c9f4-11901704e583@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:18:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201104111226.2247113-1-thomas@monjalon.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH] switch techboard meetings from IRC to Jitsi X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: web-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "web" On 11/4/20 12:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The Technical Board decided to move to voice calls. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > content/techboard/_index.md | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/content/techboard/_index.md b/content/techboard/_index.md > index 2a6d197..2384d8c 100644 > --- a/content/techboard/_index.md > +++ b/content/techboard/_index.md > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ There will be some renewal when it will be felt as needed. > > ### Meetings > > -A short meeting happens on IRC (freenode #dpdk-board) every two weeks. > +A meeting happens at https://meet.jit.si/DPDK every two weeks. > > The quorum required for a meeting to proceed is a 70% majority of the Technical Board. > > Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin I wonder whether we could keep IRC just for keeping track of the votes. Advantage over Jitsi chat is that we can keep track of the votes. Thanks, Maxime