From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E587C3F8 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:39:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fl4so35296344pad.0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:39:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wr/YhKNs5gWaKGrxhUhWTr+nmNW1P5oZ41Qy9ROzcTw=; b=sUd7DS7T6WnEx4Z67WQl8u/+gMJ1nzGiE6Z+Fl0yOZR/+Ou3kpkFdDvJlvuorZzK4Y 6KngTDz3joJ5GNdkKbQd18i5vPdZLfarsU/1qgLrRAf6zwbVrB8OfaZuKBMnVWRfVkmY KoGqrxIDTDob41Q+jYOlPq4tIgvIXCn3FriDYprTpRG/cAf4DDEcd54k32FS+rNVb+A7 MtsmbZIgpA8On28o+jY3wxDL1EbDCpps9zDg8fQInH7pg6hJ1w2WQXjRzlo5zlABHtH9 25/HkZMLijmp+WofrZKtBVFc3Bx4CYbvouH9ng5xJNlvC8f3Pf++BPhTI5okkKkqjZvr 9udg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wr/YhKNs5gWaKGrxhUhWTr+nmNW1P5oZ41Qy9ROzcTw=; b=jN985CL6H3WzyscxvitCzoP5P7Jy+nGTAOuz0Xaui860s3M5DJgWozbNtUsiJnUuaG 47SpZy0oXEfbi8vIyusXnOvP0vtBiHGmiEzJ+yOMZYnk02G3v/Laeewjeq+ZD3WFvJ7G clUmr7djs1A03K3CO2Do5hwf7bxx0Bixd1oZzNNjvQ2/f9ZhL8RJVJgIAoy74dubBl8s J1tF/6mVLQA9e2sjb+4STyP0Bj6BiZx4qSvHw/9IfZgbwt8xbm/Vf76plrxBPkMF8Ujc hyq6AnzVpdt5dGM7DGWyjpCG5LUgWtUxlI+94jiVJKDfWNq8GbtZjOjhpnb7bOm5d5sP mBXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSGxuhfRkI5czE5g0qFsvTFdtCJA7HQnJX+mwYnzrD5/tp2yn6T1oySEt9+Th2rtg== X-Received: by 10.66.191.202 with SMTP id ha10mr12304277pac.8.1455820777914; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l24sm11934769pfb.73.2016.02.18.10.39.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:39:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:39:48 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20160218103948.420d6ca5@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <1455568495-26734-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> References: <1455568495-26734-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:05:24 +0100 Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, web@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] decision making via technical board X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:39:39 -0000 > +

Technical board

> +

The decision making process is primarily based on consensus. > + However in rare cases, the technical board can make a decision > + when consensus is not reached on the mailing list. > +

The scope of this body is limited to questions directly related to the > + following repositories: > +

    > +
  • dpdk.git > +
  • dpdk-next*.git > +
  • dpdk-web.git > +
If you limit to just git it seems too narrowly focused. What if we had to kick someone off mailing list? Or negotiate with other organizations. I really don't understand what this sentence is trying to say (in a legal sense). > +

After having tried to solve every concerns, a maintainer > + (listed in the MAINTAINERS file) > + or a board member (listed below) can request a board meeting as a last resort. > + Then the technical board will meet on IRC to issue a decision within 2 weeks. > + A quorum of 6 members is required. > +

The 7 members are: Maybe add current > +

    > +
  • Bruce Richardson > +
  • Jerin Jacob > +
  • Konstantin Ananyev > +
  • Olivier Matz > +
  • Panu Matilainen > +
  • Stephen Hemminger > +
  • Thomas Monjalon > +
> + >