From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f178.google.com (mail-wr0-f178.google.com [209.85.128.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C57CF80 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:24:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u108so41713411wrb.3 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:24:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7BYui9Ug2+rrvT+LwEY8jtWpR1Xm2IEiuM7cNbVBpCk=; b=sEX+CFg7119PlpkRFF+I6K6qBwOYVxBXCHocOqzZPppVkuxN5LwMYMzmyZGZ4zMqq8 izjMFnCzYAfJdkDcw3KZIpinQke+8UTCHnm6ry9EmEJ+oK+g1jP0s4YjX0rqd1CSQfgq v44/Rw4YMFdHGjj30ZojxbKq8eHyVNWrWqeRtrQHypzLkMadsKmHGnZ95ltrlqyaVOLb +wt1av2ibWxhNDH5eNPGus5RBT5hVKxUc284VZqN002UkR0fMsI5/CwINsAmDxp/citW inrSC2xUJTvB2h+st/ioVUIPBfd7YDns5F3+oMFPkjTN8dO28aWgrgezO5jmp22kEpzI 7/lg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7BYui9Ug2+rrvT+LwEY8jtWpR1Xm2IEiuM7cNbVBpCk=; b=cm1JTVNx7sOIFeO5ARAkqX3p/N+TMDXRtRD+ZeJzQS65gqEOkMjAOAAhGEQB1orVlM IPk86mnFiT4sw8WCum+4i87HQCq7J+TaUnzlvJBcJCw7MIC5fQ8yzj7im+OsyHOD6Mhu /zhIYGgAixyuA8oo53qSZhLUTVW4coz2ooHZThuqGRYIpmVnLv9XcaUjhDJ7yw+M2Q4r z9YNRIBY8vIrbAev/BNGsJ0A+RlplXFuHcc1+cOaMUnff0yO7HZ9EcONqW50qam2SYMW qNMyBkXTPjQBWl4Xk22bz6m+FvHwzrK+lW/1nBT3lk0VIbT3uBJxrCy8SvTkRskl8OaJ zcqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kgp0hnWVzwy+7Kvx4Dpogk0LaFUO3MwzY2DlibUep6nE8Q6Tqas3K9SpVHnpu3ml5f X-Received: by 10.223.166.7 with SMTP id k7mr9270195wrc.52.1489055044726; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 32sm7607067wrr.64.2017.03.09.02.24.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:24:04 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: web@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:24:03 +0100 Message-ID: <2903339.cFK4MDzFIP@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170308152903.60009058@xeon-e3> References: <1487589865-15596-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20170308152903.60009058@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH] update techboard description X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:24:05 -0000 2017-03-08 15:29, Stephen Hemminger: > Fine as far as it goes. There are some later issues that need to be addressed > in revisions. We need a Code Of Conduct and a process for handling infractions > documented before first offense. This will help CYA and attract a more diverse > set of contributors. If a CoC is not created by techboard one will be placed > upon us by LF. > > One issue that has come up on the kernel developers list is how to handle people > who spam the community with useless and broken patches. There is already an unofficial > short list of known abusers who are ignored. As DPDK gets bigger we are bound > to attract these clueless developers. What is the plan for that? Is it a tech > board topic. Yes it may be a techboard topic. It can also be discussed on dev@dpdk.org before discussing in techboard meeting. Feel free to open the discussion.