From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B981BB2A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:54:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e69so16423945wmg.0 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:54:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gXuf21Cj6anQqkf8sYwroN4plwphEwTPwXzg1b7R26E=; b=yJrta9mOVJh+0DxtNOAmBUW+hgcQuc1MuiBAx6CdqFgxVMNB4TKqtwXWmLXviRd5BS POLGlUp5fGpuNJkpdyJ9fxFR41cDqn4vI/KR32Fx84dgNdtav2OvT9JrbRGxuAuQxK1j k9DOFBQkZN0ScLrKWu06bHvpSlsWnFQf736ZKE4Di3O55TTkz8VLuXaNsqYX8BD0PiNz d1emoJh2xecrwWJB/CMRgVtbeQOzSJ58AHCJh67Zp4mmH2jtHl95H3snUkrBLF/PTDBA RoWZ7AsrqbHV9VsKrZOI3He3Y+xnO2g6hBYXh5VplnSTAB6OLvGbmWtud86cbucVHEP8 k17Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gXuf21Cj6anQqkf8sYwroN4plwphEwTPwXzg1b7R26E=; b=BlQROo/5etANPCDMaSEOVqJaBUnDwEbf/1Iq3Z8j7ZFCMK+XerNMYY1D8qgyzhA+Pt 6UmTf/QzJli8Vs1/oKS/wuzrkpt40kZP9YDp5RxnEnLe04l0lztkk7B0IlZD7XZyI7j+ ci8k2vg7MAO5/6RKNa8vJhBNQxcGXSs4hmY67iAMSle1nNkkcLhJkkNEmqNbq6CJtF7g VtKByPn8oKoWi9RMZraopQn19XY7cjuzz/KoSRJCmA52yQCaYw+lXRc6jnBNSX8zueJI tta29u3rhFIUlBvfs3i4gKYeyqe0DYFjVUDwWXFiTUP2g8+KekVqOtiC6pAxRY9fC2bM IBYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd6EF/B+HZpKu+Ibvf71ALCiQoiKyI4Sp9CEXUU09SejJg3J5BvWLd4R9gv/d5LcRPY X-Received: by 10.194.60.106 with SMTP id g10mr1529393wjr.151.1477475690165; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w65sm2107570wmd.23.2016.10.26.02.54.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:54:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Van Haaren, Harry" Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:54:48 +0200 Message-ID: <3178910.e9ToaVHYup@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1477469498-19637-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: web@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] release 16.07.1 X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:54:50 -0000 2016-10-26 08:58, Van Haaren, Harry: > Hi, > > Looks ok, I have a few comments: > > > -----Original Message----- > > Another note: there is a

decorator after the "latest stalbe > > release" icon, because in my local testing, it can't show 4 > > icons in one row. Thus I splitted it them in two rows, each with > > 2 icons. > > I'm ok with the split into 2x2 grid, centering the buttons makes the page look better IMO. > I can patch after this is applied. I've sent a v2 with buttons in one row. (actually sent 2 times, first on dev@ :/ ) > > - DPDK 16.07 > > - 2016 July 28 > > Looks like release notes date is being updated, but it still points to the same link? No, 16.07 is replaced by 16.07.1 in this list. The whole list of every versions is available at http://fast.dpdk.org/rel/ > > - 

690a2bb570103e58d12f9806e8bf21be
> > + DPDK 16.07.1 > > It is not clear that this is the stable branch. Would it make more sense to rename to "DPDK Stable 16.07.1" or similar to make it more obvious this release has backports/fixes? I don't think it is needed. This list could point only to the latest tar.xz of each major version (16.11, 16.07.1, etc).