[dpdk-web] [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[dpdk-web] [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[Wenzhuo Lu]

From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
---
 doc/nics.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/nics.html b/doc/nics.html
index ffe4455..58d6bf8 100644
--- a/doc/nics.html
+++ b/doc/nics.html
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 				<li><a href="/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/">e1000e</a> (82571, 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)</li>
 				<li><a href="/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/">igb</a> (82575, 82576, 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)</li>
 				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.html">ixgbe</a> (82598, 82599, X520, X540, X550)</li>
-				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/i40e.html">i40e</a> (X710, XL710, X722)</li>
+				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/i40e.html">i40e</a> (X710, XL710, X722, XXV710)</li>
 				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/fm10k.html">fm10k</a> (FM10420)</li>
 			</ul>
 			<p>Note: The drivers <em>e1000</em> and <em>e1000e</em> are also called <em>em</em>.
-- 
2.9.5

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[Zhang, Helin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:32 AM
> To: web@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming
> Subject: [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs
> 
> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>

> ---
>  doc/nics.html | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/nics.html b/doc/nics.html index ffe4455..58d6bf8 100644
> --- a/doc/nics.html
> +++ b/doc/nics.html
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
>  				<li><a
> href="/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/">e1000e</a> (82571, 82572,
> 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)</li>
>  				<li><a
> href="/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/">igb</a> (82575, 82576, 82580,
> I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)</li>
>  				<li><a
> href="/doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.html">ixgbe</a> (82598, 82599, X520, X540,
> X550)</li>
> -				<li><a
> href="/doc/guides/nics/i40e.html">i40e</a> (X710, XL710, X722)</li>
> +				<li><a
> href="/doc/guides/nics/i40e.html">i40e</a> (X710, XL710,
> +X722, XXV710)</li>
>  				<li><a
> href="/doc/guides/nics/fm10k.html">fm10k</a> (FM10420)</li>
>  			</ul>
>  			<p>Note: The drivers <em>e1000</em> and
> <em>e1000e</em> are also called <em>em</em>.
> --
> 2.9.5

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[Mcnamara, John]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: web [mailto:web-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wenzhuo Lu
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:32 AM
> To: web@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs
> 
> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>


Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[Thomas Monjalon]

16/05/2018 04:32, Wenzhuo Lu:
> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>

Qiming sent a duplicate after this one.

BTW, same comments as other patch:

Please add some details in the commit message:
support has been added in which release?
Is there a commit id to reference?

[dpdk-web] [PATCH v2] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[Wenzhuo Lu]

From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>

XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.

Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e

Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
---
 doc/nics.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/nics.html b/doc/nics.html
index ffe4455..58d6bf8 100644
--- a/doc/nics.html
+++ b/doc/nics.html
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 				<li><a href="/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/">e1000e</a> (82571, 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)</li>
 				<li><a href="/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/">igb</a> (82575, 82576, 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)</li>
 				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.html">ixgbe</a> (82598, 82599, X520, X540, X550)</li>
-				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/i40e.html">i40e</a> (X710, XL710, X722)</li>
+				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/i40e.html">i40e</a> (X710, XL710, X722, XXV710)</li>
 				<li><a href="/doc/guides/nics/fm10k.html">fm10k</a> (FM10420)</li>
 			</ul>
 			<p>Note: The drivers <em>e1000</em> and <em>e1000e</em> are also called <em>em</em>.
-- 
2.9.5

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH v2] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[Thomas Monjalon]

29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> 
> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
> 
> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>

Applied, thanks

Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH v2] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>
>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
>>
>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks

Hi Thomas,

I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web page, it may
be lost somehow, how can we add it back?


And supported hardware information is presented in two different location in
webpage:
https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware

Can we reduce it into single place?
Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?


And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is almost not
readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can we fix it?


Thanks,
ferruh

Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Thomas Monjalon]

28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
> >> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> >>
> >> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
> >>
> >> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web page, it may
> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?

Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org (see the patch below).
Thanks for the report.


> And supported hardware information is presented in two different location in
> webpage:
> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
> 
> Can we reduce it into single place?
> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?

I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of vendors.
I think we don't need all the details here.
As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in core.dpdk.org.
And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and precisely with patches.

I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and other HW,
and point to the core.dpdk.org page for details.


> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is almost not
> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can we fix it?

Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux Foundation.
I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on the name.
Example:
	https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/


---------------------

--- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
+++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
 - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571, 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
 - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576, 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
 - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599, X520, X540, X550)
-- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722)
+- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722, XXV710)
 - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
 
 {{% notice note %}}

--- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
+++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
 weight = "8"
 +++
 
-- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
+- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)

--- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
+++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
 +++
 
 - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3, ConnectX-3 Pro)
-- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
+- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)

--- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
+++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
 weight = "13"
 +++
 
-- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx)
+- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)

Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 6/28/2018 9:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
>>>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
>>>>
>>>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web page, it may
>> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?
> 
> Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
> I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org (see the patch below).

Looks good, thanks.

> Thanks for the report.
> 
> 
>> And supported hardware information is presented in two different location in
>> webpage:
>> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
>> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
>>
>> Can we reduce it into single place?
>> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?
> 
> I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of vendors.
> I think we don't need all the details here.
> As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in core.dpdk.org.
> And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and precisely with patches.
> 
> I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and other HW,
> and point to the core.dpdk.org page for details.

+1

> 
> 
>> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is almost not
>> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can we fix it?
> 
> Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux Foundation.
> I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
> There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on the name.
> Example:
> 	https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/

Yes this page look better, I think it is better to have similar view in support
page.

> 
> 
> ---------------------
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
>  - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571, 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
>  - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576, 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
>  - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599, X520, X540, X550)
> -- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722)
> +- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722, XXV710)
>  - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
>  
>  {{% notice note %}}
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>  weight = "8"
>  +++
>  
> -- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
> +- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
>  +++
>  
>  - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3, ConnectX-3 Pro)
> -- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
> +- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>  weight = "13"
>  +++
>  
> -- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx)
> +- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)
> 
> 
> 

Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 7/2/2018 11:32 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/28/2018 9:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
>>>>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Applied, thanks
>>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web page, it may
>>> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?
>>
>> Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
>> I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org (see the patch below).
> 
> Looks good, thanks.
> 
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>>
>>> And supported hardware information is presented in two different location in
>>> webpage:
>>> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
>>> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
>>>
>>> Can we reduce it into single place?
>>> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?
>>
>> I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of vendors.
>> I think we don't need all the details here.
>> As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in core.dpdk.org.
>> And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and precisely with patches.
>>
>> I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and other HW,
>> and point to the core.dpdk.org page for details.
> 
> +1

"https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware" is still there and XXV710 is still
missing!

What is the process of updating LF managed web pages? Is someone tracking this
mail list?

> 
>>
>>
>>> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is almost not
>>> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can we fix it?
>>
>> Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux Foundation.
>> I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
>> There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on the name.
>> Example:
>> 	https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/
> 
> Yes this page look better, I think it is better to have similar view in support
> page.
> 
>>
>>
>> ---------------------
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
>>  - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571, 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
>>  - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576, 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
>>  - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599, X520, X540, X550)
>> -- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722)
>> +- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722, XXV710)
>>  - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
>>  
>>  {{% notice note %}}
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
>> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>>  weight = "8"
>>  +++
>>  
>> -- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
>> +- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
>> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
>>  +++
>>  
>>  - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3, ConnectX-3 Pro)
>> -- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
>> +- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
>> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>>  weight = "13"
>>  +++
>>  
>> -- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx)
>> +- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)
>>
>>
>>
> 

Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Trishan de Lanerolle]

Hi Ferruh,
Thanks for your mail. The ecosystem page points to
http://core.dpdk.org/supported/ which is the page of reference for the
hardware. The ecosystem page is not meant to be exhaustive list and just a
sample to show diversity of available hardware, the URLs point to the
respective pages in core. Ie. Intel page goes to
http://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/ .

We will be simplifying the Ecosystem page in the future to make it clearer.

Trishan


On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:15 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:

> On 7/2/2018 11:32 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 6/28/2018 9:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
> >>> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
> >>>>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Applied, thanks
> >>>
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>
> >>> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web
> page, it may
> >>> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?
> >>
> >> Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
> >> I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org (see the patch below).
> >
> > Looks good, thanks.
> >
> >> Thanks for the report.
> >>
> >>
> >>> And supported hardware information is presented in two different
> location in
> >>> webpage:
> >>> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
> >>> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
> >>>
> >>> Can we reduce it into single place?
> >>> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?
> >>
> >> I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of
> vendors.
> >> I think we don't need all the details here.
> >> As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in
> core.dpdk.org.
> >> And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and
> precisely with patches.
> >>
> >> I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and
> other HW,
> >> and point to the core.dpdk.org page for details.
> >
> > +1
>
> "https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware" is still there and XXV710 is
> still
> missing!
>
> What is the process of updating LF managed web pages? Is someone tracking
> this
> mail list?
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is
> almost not
> >>> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can
> we fix it?
> >>
> >> Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux
> Foundation.
> >> I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
> >> There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on
> the name.
> >> Example:
> >>      https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/
> >
> > Yes this page look better, I think it is better to have similar view in
> support
> > page.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> >> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
> >>  - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571,
> 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
> >>  - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576,
> 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
> >>  - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599,
> X520, X540, X550)
> >> -- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710,
> X722)
> >> +- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710,
> X722, XXV710)
> >>  - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
> >>
> >>  {{% notice note %}}
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> >> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
> >>  weight = "8"
> >>  +++
> >>
> >> -- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet
> Processor v2)
> >> +- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet
> Processor v2)
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> >> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
> >>  +++
> >>
> >>  - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3,
> ConnectX-3 Pro)
> >> -- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4,
> ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
> >> +- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4,
> ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> >> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
> >>  weight = "13"
> >>  +++
> >>
> >> -- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx,
> SFN8xxx)
> >> +- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx,
> SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

-- 
Trishan R. de Lanerolle
Program Manager,  Networking
Linux Foundation
voice: +1.203.699.6401
skype: tdelanerolle
email: tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org

Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 8/21/2018 12:23 PM, Trishan de Lanerolle wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
> Thanks for your mail. The ecosystem page points
> to http://core.dpdk.org/supported/ which is the page of reference for the
> hardware. The ecosystem page is not meant to be exhaustive list and just a
> sample to show diversity of available hardware, the URLs point to the respective
> pages in core. Ie. Intel page goes to http://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/ . 
> 
> We will be simplifying the Ecosystem page in the future to make it clearer.

Hi Trishan,

Thanks for the prompt response, as mentioned previously, I think it is better to
remove duplication here and have a single page that list the supported hardware.

Thanks,
ferruh

> 
> Trishan
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:15 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 7/2/2018 11:32 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>     > On 6/28/2018 9:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>     >> 28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
>     >>> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>     >>>> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
>     >>>>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com <mailto:qiming.yang@intel.com>>
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com
>     <mailto:qiming.yang@intel.com>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Applied, thanks
>     >>>
>     >>> Hi Thomas,
>     >>>
>     >>> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web page,
>     it may
>     >>> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?
>     >>
>     >> Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
>     >> I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org <http://core.dpdk.org> (see the patch
>     below).
>     >
>     > Looks good, thanks.
>     >
>     >> Thanks for the report.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>> And supported hardware information is presented in two different location in
>     >>> webpage:
>     >>> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
>     >>> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
>     >>>
>     >>> Can we reduce it into single place?
>     >>> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?
>     >>
>     >> I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of vendors.
>     >> I think we don't need all the details here.
>     >> As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in
>     core.dpdk.org <http://core.dpdk.org>.
>     >> And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and precisely
>     with patches.
>     >>
>     >> I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and other HW,
>     >> and point to the core.dpdk.org <http://core.dpdk.org> page for details.
>     >
>     > +1
> 
>     "https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware" is still there and XXV710 is still
>     missing!
> 
>     What is the process of updating LF managed web pages? Is someone tracking this
>     mail list?
> 
>     >
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is
>     almost not
>     >>> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can we
>     fix it?
>     >>
>     >> Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux
>     Foundation.
>     >> I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
>     >> There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on the
>     name.
>     >> Example:
>     >>      https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/
>     >
>     > Yes this page look better, I think it is better to have similar view in
>     support
>     > page.
>     >
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> ---------------------
>     >>
>     >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
>     >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
>     >> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
>     >>  - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571,
>     82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
>     >>  - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576, 82580,
>     I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
>     >>  - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599,
>     X520, X540, X550)
>     >> -- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722)
>     >> +- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722,
>     XXV710)
>     >>  - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
>     >> 
>     >>  {{% notice note %}}
>     >>
>     >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
>     >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
>     >> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>     >>  weight = "8"
>     >>  +++
>     >> 
>     >> -- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet
>     Processor v2)
>     >> +- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet
>     Processor v2)
>     >>
>     >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
>     >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
>     >> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
>     >>  +++
>     >> 
>     >>  - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3,
>     ConnectX-3 Pro)
>     >> -- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4,
>     ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
>     >> +- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4,
>     ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)
>     >>
>     >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
>     >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
>     >> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>     >>  weight = "13"
>     >>  +++
>     >> 
>     >> -- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx)
>     >> +- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx,
>     SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Trishan R. de Lanerolle
> Program Manager,  Networking
> Linux Foundation
> voice: +1.203.699.6401
> skype: tdelanerolle
> email: tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org <mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>

Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 8/21/2018 12:31 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 8/21/2018 12:23 PM, Trishan de Lanerolle wrote:
>> Hi Ferruh,
>> Thanks for your mail. The ecosystem page points
>> to http://core.dpdk.org/supported/ which is the page of reference for the
>> hardware. The ecosystem page is not meant to be exhaustive list and just a
>> sample to show diversity of available hardware, the URLs point to the respective
>> pages in core. Ie. Intel page goes to http://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/ . 
>>
>> We will be simplifying the Ecosystem page in the future to make it clearer.
> 
> Hi Trishan,
> 
> Thanks for the prompt response, as mentioned previously, I think it is better to
> remove duplication here and have a single page that list the supported hardware.

Hi Trishan,

I have just recognized ecosystem-supported_hardware [1] has been updated, I
think looks better now, thanks.

[1]: https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware