From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E025C467F3; Mon, 26 May 2025 12:02:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C19402ED; Mon, 26 May 2025 12:02:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C36B40280 for ; Mon, 26 May 2025 12:02:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.phl.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A1F114012D; Mon, 26 May 2025 06:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 May 2025 06:02:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1748253748; x=1748340148; bh=mKM6W/lWz4l1hzrGaOt+0y92JksOunA2L/Xf/PZ1i70=; b= LwBcrhhdQjP6Ic79UvvIndUEttENkLoIrZdN7+MVfkUeobaxW4dr/BTgRa85B7pG OWDZDIjXe/zt1mr0btMx0KYMlgO3xH6k8lczsSbcN2kSBP5f2lYEj9yyNYhSDPbB +Wi2QlncAeLz8QhahsJtc1ORjQsdXh4dTxkNnrorvF0HnKW7rgZnwPztpD6Ngnet 9mwgPTNNEhuVeJhn9rGJ3KOiy/xi1dws8H7n/s4hsphdFUDipq9V+bhsGfNw/r4A d7X5otJw5yHQrne3S3pRpQ/HBR0yWskDV60p18CYoc2j+En7Ugn+IrZ90PDWx81y 5Cs0g/e1J6auMOYU/SzznQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1748253748; x= 1748340148; bh=mKM6W/lWz4l1hzrGaOt+0y92JksOunA2L/Xf/PZ1i70=; b=A tXzZ5PE1jWu2tvOu0WwETsT8YCNHvAzUAtfKZ2PZ5xqIbsYNqx4RU6iuzX4OyOia XZlHOtmbsaEKTMY68Dh09ihUV3b90dgQ69GzRGSESfpYqaytkKdY98Jo6Bgwsc13 E2ivCV9wI+w6NaXGLmI6X1/AiuxrE0JSjORyb9t4EE9eYkz4DIfLgfzaAaXIXTcW ilyl6WkPtp43a8jpYMNHqfbFZZevwkjnHpU2CS1941hxGTZb8N8ItQqwU/gxaLUf 19mHLGL78LVTP3msMyaZ/eqA8C/N1ybOehhxN9+Zm26PdQQzMOPGG+q8LWoW4XPa K3lvA9auKcVJydYjLytDg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgddujedvfeculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgj fhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuc eothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedt tdeljeejgeffkeekkedtjeevtdehvedtkeeivdeuuedvieduvdelveejueejnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehm ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouh htpdhrtghpthhtohepjhgrmhgvshgphhhurghnghesrggvfihinhdrtghomhdprhgtphht thhopeifvggsseguphgukhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 26 May 2025 06:02:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: =?UTF-8?B?amFtZXNfaHVhbmfpu4PllZ/ou5I=?= Cc: "web@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 12:02:26 +0200 Message-ID: <50035813.MN2xkq1pzW@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20250526081152.2632-1-james_huang@aewin.com> <1866001.yIU609i1g2@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: web-bounces@dpdk.org OK, thank you for the explanations. So AEWIN NICs can be used with the DPDK drivers i40e and ice without any modification? Don't you have different PCI IDs? 26/05/2025 11:25, james_huang=E9=BB=83=E5=95=9F=E8=BB=92: > From: Thomas Monjalon =20 >=20 > > This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old. > > Why not testing a more recent one? >=20 > =3D> Since the Intel E810 uses DPDK version 23.03, we followed its proced= ures to validate AEWIN NICs accordingly. =46or information, Intel E810 NIC can be use with any DPDK version since 19.02, including the recent 25.03. > > Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very > > surprised. Are you going to submit some code? >=20 > =3D> Our company's NICs use the Intel=C2=AE XL710-BM1 and Intel=C2=AE E81= 0-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are based on Intel's. The purpose of upload= ing to DPDK.org is to increase our company's visibility, allowing our custo= mers to download our performance reports directly from the DPDK website. It= also signifies that Intel recognizes the DPDK performance of AEWIN NICs.