* [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page @ 2020-11-09 11:18 Thomas Monjalon 2020-11-10 2:54 ` 谈鉴锋 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-11-09 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jill Lovato Cc: tdelanerolle, web, konstantin.ananyev, Jianfeng Tan, irene.zhang, maxime.coquelin, orika, guyk Hi, I'm looking to update the ecosystem page: https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/ In the list of projects using DPDK, - ANS got a website: http://www.ansyun.com/ - F-Stack is missing: http://www.f-stack.org/ - TLDK is missing: https://github.com/FDio/tldk/ Should we prefer TLDKv2? https://github.com/FDio/tldk/tree/dev-next-socket - demikernel/catnip is missing: https://github.com/demikernel/demikernel/tree/master/src/rust/catnip In the list of device classes, we are missing: - Regular Expression Engine - vHost Data Path Acceleration Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page 2020-11-09 11:18 [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-11-10 2:54 ` 谈鉴锋 2020-11-10 9:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: 谈鉴锋 @ 2020-11-10 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Monjalon, Jill Lovato Cc: tdelanerolle, web, AnanyevKonstantin, 谈鉴锋(浩也), irene.zhang, maxime.coquelin, orika, guyk, 周介龙(卓腾) +Jielong As a developer and user of TLDK, glad to see this topic. Recently, we have added more features into TLDK, like SACK, fixed 10+ bugs, and deployed TLDK into online applications. From our side, we would continue to use and invest TLDK, and open source what we have in TLDK. As you can see in our case, TLDK and DPDK can be used in cloud-native env, besides network-type application, like LB, DNS, etc. It's a much larger deployment than the later sitting at the data center edge or telecom boxes. In all, we'd like to see TLDK shown in this page, and more users can reference it. As for TLDK vs TLDKv2, now we definitely use TLDKv2. Considering that TLDKv2 provides both l4p and socket interface, I personally think we can move on to TLDKv2. Konstantin, what's your opinion? Thanks, Jianfeng ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Send Time:2020年11月9日(星期一) 19:19 To:Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org> Cc:tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>; web <web@dpdk.org>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; orika <orika@nvidia.com>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com> Subject:update of ecosystem page Hi, I'm looking to update the ecosystem page: https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/ In the list of projects using DPDK, - ANS got a website: http://www.ansyun.com/ - F-Stack is missing: http://www.f-stack.org/ - TLDK is missing: https://github.com/FDio/tldk/ Should we prefer TLDKv2? https://github.com/FDio/tldk/tree/dev-next-socket - demikernel/catnip is missing: https://github.com/demikernel/demikernel/tree/master/src/rust/catnip In the list of device classes, we are missing: - Regular Expression Engine - vHost Data Path Acceleration Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page 2020-11-10 2:54 ` 谈鉴锋 @ 2020-11-10 9:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin 2020-12-09 18:33 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-11-10 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 谈鉴锋, Thomas Monjalon, Jill Lovato Cc: tdelanerolle, web, 谈鉴锋(浩也), irene.zhang, maxime.coquelin, orika, guyk, 周介龙(卓腾) Hi Jianfeng, I am fine either way, one thing that concerns me with TLDKv2 link – as I can see it is not synced with latest TLDK code (memtank lib is not there). Do you plan to sync them up somehow? Konstantin From: 谈鉴锋 <henry.tjf@antgroup.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 2:54 AM To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>; web <web@dpdk.org>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; orika <orika@nvidia.com>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com>; 周介龙(卓腾) <jielong.zjl@antfin.com> Subject: Re: update of ecosystem page +Jielong As a developer and user of TLDK, glad to see this topic. Recently, we have added more features into TLDK, like SACK, fixed 10+ bugs, and deployed TLDK into online applications. From our side, we would continue to use and invest TLDK, and open source what we have in TLDK. As you can see in our case, TLDK and DPDK can be used in cloud-native env, besides network-type application, like LB, DNS, etc. It's a much larger deployment than the later sitting at the data center edge or telecom boxes. In all, we'd like to see TLDK shown in this page, and more users can reference it. As for TLDK vs TLDKv2, now we definitely use TLDKv2. Considering that TLDKv2 provides both l4p and socket interface, I personally think we can move on to TLDKv2. Konstantin, what's your opinion? Thanks, Jianfeng ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> Send Time:2020年11月9日(星期一) 19:19 To:Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>> Cc:tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>>; web <web@dpdk.org<mailto:web@dpdk.org>>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com>>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com<mailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com>>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com<mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>>; orika <orika@nvidia.com<mailto:orika@nvidia.com>>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com<mailto:guyk@marvell.com>> Subject:update of ecosystem page Hi, I'm looking to update the ecosystem page: https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/ In the list of projects using DPDK, - ANS got a website: http://www.ansyun.com/ - F-Stack is missing: http://www.f-stack.org/ - TLDK is missing: https://github.com/FDio/tldk/ Should we prefer TLDKv2? https://github.com/FDio/tldk/tree/dev-next-socket - demikernel/catnip is missing: https://github.com/demikernel/demikernel/tree/master/src/rust/catnip In the list of device classes, we are missing: - Regular Expression Engine - vHost Data Path Acceleration Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page 2020-11-10 9:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-12-09 18:33 ` Thomas Monjalon 2020-12-10 3:18 ` 谈鉴锋 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-12-09 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 谈鉴锋, Ananyev, Konstantin Cc: Jill Lovato, tdelanerolle, web, 谈鉴锋(浩也), irene. zhang, maxime. coquelin, orika, guyk, 周介龙(卓腾) Any conclusion about TLDKv2? I think we'll go with the general link to TLDK. Anyway, TLDKv2 should be merged in the main branch when ready, right? 10/11/2020 10:50, Ananyev, Konstantin: > Hi Jianfeng, > > I am fine either way, one thing that concerns me with TLDKv2 link – > as I can see it is not synced with latest TLDK code (memtank lib is not there). > Do you plan to sync them up somehow? > Konstantin > > > From: 谈鉴锋 <henry.tjf@antgroup.com> > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 2:54 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>; web <web@dpdk.org>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; orika <orika@nvidia.com>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com>; 周介龙(卓腾) <jielong.zjl@antfin.com> > Subject: Re: update of ecosystem page > > +Jielong > > As a developer and user of TLDK, glad to see this topic. > > Recently, we have added more features into TLDK, like SACK, fixed 10+ bugs, and deployed TLDK into online applications. > From our side, we would continue to use and invest TLDK, and open source what we have in TLDK. > > As you can see in our case, TLDK and DPDK can be used in cloud-native env, besides network-type application, like LB, DNS, etc. > It's a much larger deployment than the later sitting at the data center edge or telecom boxes. > > In all, we'd like to see TLDK shown in this page, and more users can reference it. As for TLDK vs TLDKv2, now we > definitely use TLDKv2. Considering that TLDKv2 provides both l4p and socket interface, I personally think we can move on to TLDKv2. > Konstantin, what's your opinion? > > Thanks, > Jianfeng > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> > Send Time:2020年11月9日(星期一) 19:19 > To:Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>> > Cc:tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>>; web <web@dpdk.org<mailto:web@dpdk.org>>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com>>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com<mailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com>>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com<mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>>; orika <orika@nvidia.com<mailto:orika@nvidia.com>>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com<mailto:guyk@marvell.com>> > Subject:update of ecosystem page > > Hi, > > I'm looking to update the ecosystem page: > https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/ > > In the list of projects using DPDK, > - ANS got a website: http://www.ansyun.com/ > - F-Stack is missing: http://www.f-stack.org/ > - TLDK is missing: https://github.com/FDio/tldk/ > Should we prefer TLDKv2? https://github.com/FDio/tldk/tree/dev-next-socket > - demikernel/catnip is missing: https://github.com/demikernel/demikernel/tree/master/src/rust/catnip > > In the list of device classes, we are missing: > - Regular Expression Engine > - vHost Data Path Acceleration > > Thanks > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page 2020-12-09 18:33 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-12-10 3:18 ` 谈鉴锋 2020-12-10 9:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: 谈鉴锋 @ 2020-12-10 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Monjalon, AnanyevKonstantin Cc: Jill Lovato, tdelanerolle, web, 谈鉴锋(浩也), irene. zhang, maxime. coquelin, orika, guyk, 周介龙(卓腾) > Any conclusion about TLDKv2? Was trying to find some time to rebase, but failed to finish it so far. > I think we'll go with the general link to TLDK. > Anyway, TLDKv2 should be merged in the main branch when ready, right? +1, we can move on with this. Thanks, Jianfeng ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Send Time:2020年12月10日(星期四) 02:34 To:谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antgroup.com>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Cc:Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>; tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>; web <web@dpdk.org>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com>; irene. zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com>; maxime. coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; orika <orika@nvidia.com>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com>; 周介龙(卓腾) <jielong.zjl@antfin.com> Subject:Re: update of ecosystem page Any conclusion about TLDKv2? I think we'll go with the general link to TLDK. Anyway, TLDKv2 should be merged in the main branch when ready, right? 10/11/2020 10:50, Ananyev, Konstantin: > Hi Jianfeng, > > I am fine either way, one thing that concerns me with TLDKv2 link – > as I can see it is not synced with latest TLDK code (memtank lib is not there). > Do you plan to sync them up somehow? > Konstantin > > > From: 谈鉴锋 <henry.tjf@antgroup.com> > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 2:54 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>; web <web@dpdk.org>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; orika <orika@nvidia.com>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com>; 周介龙(卓腾) <jielong.zjl@antfin.com> > Subject: Re: update of ecosystem page > > +Jielong > > As a developer and user of TLDK, glad to see this topic. > > Recently, we have added more features into TLDK, like SACK, fixed 10+ bugs, and deployed TLDK into online applications. > From our side, we would continue to use and invest TLDK, and open source what we have in TLDK. > > As you can see in our case, TLDK and DPDK can be used in cloud-native env, besides network-type application, like LB, DNS, etc. > It's a much larger deployment than the later sitting at the data center edge or telecom boxes. > > In all, we'd like to see TLDK shown in this page, and more users can reference it. As for TLDK vs TLDKv2, now we > definitely use TLDKv2. Considering that TLDKv2 provides both l4p and socket interface, I personally think we can move on to TLDKv2. > Konstantin, what's your opinion? > > Thanks, > Jianfeng > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> > Send Time:2020年11月9日(星期一) 19:19 > To:Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>> > Cc:tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>>; web <web@dpdk.org<mailto:web@dpdk.org>>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com>>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com<mailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com>>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com<mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>>; orika <orika@nvidia.com<mailto:orika@nvidia.com>>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com<mailto:guyk@marvell.com>> > Subject:update of ecosystem page > > Hi, > > I'm looking to update the ecosystem page: > https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/ > > In the list of projects using DPDK, > - ANS got a website: http://www.ansyun.com/ > - F-Stack is missing: http://www.f-stack.org/ > - TLDK is missing: https://github.com/FDio/tldk/ > Should we prefer TLDKv2? https://github.com/FDio/tldk/tree/dev-next-socket > - demikernel/catnip is missing: https://github.com/demikernel/demikernel/tree/master/src/rust/catnip > > In the list of device classes, we are missing: > - Regular Expression Engine > - vHost Data Path Acceleration > > Thanks > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page 2020-12-10 3:18 ` 谈鉴锋 @ 2020-12-10 9:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-12-10 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 谈鉴锋, Thomas Monjalon Cc: Jill Lovato, tdelanerolle, web, 谈鉴锋(浩也), irene. zhang, maxime. coquelin, orika, guyk, 周介龙(卓腾) >> Any conclusion about TLDKv2? >Was trying to find some time to rebase, but failed to finish it so far. > I think we'll go with the general link to TLDK. > Anyway, TLDKv2 should be merged in the main branch when ready, right? >+1, we can move on with this. Fine by me. Another alternative – have both links on that page? From: 谈鉴锋 <henry.tjf@antgroup.com> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 3:19 AM To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Cc: Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>; tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>; web <web@dpdk.org>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com>; irene. zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com>; maxime. coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; orika <orika@nvidia.com>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com>; 周介龙(卓腾) <jielong.zjl@antfin.com> Subject: Re: update of ecosystem page > Any conclusion about TLDKv2? Was trying to find some time to rebase, but failed to finish it so far. > I think we'll go with the general link to TLDK. > Anyway, TLDKv2 should be merged in the main branch when ready, right? +1, we can move on with this. Thanks, Jianfeng ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> Send Time:2020年12月10日(星期四) 02:34 To:谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antgroup.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antgroup.com>>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>> Cc:Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>>; tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>>; web <web@dpdk.org<mailto:web@dpdk.org>>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com>>; irene. zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com<mailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com>>; maxime. coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com<mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>>; orika <orika@nvidia.com<mailto:orika@nvidia.com>>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com<mailto:guyk@marvell.com>>; 周介龙(卓腾) <jielong.zjl@antfin.com<mailto:jielong.zjl@antfin.com>> Subject:Re: update of ecosystem page Any conclusion about TLDKv2? I think we'll go with the general link to TLDK. Anyway, TLDKv2 should be merged in the main branch when ready, right? 10/11/2020 10:50, Ananyev, Konstantin: > Hi Jianfeng, > > I am fine either way, one thing that concerns me with TLDKv2 link – > as I can see it is not synced with latest TLDK code (memtank lib is not there). > Do you plan to sync them up somehow? > Konstantin > > > From: 谈鉴锋 <henry.tjf@antgroup.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antgroup.com>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 2:54 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>>; Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>> > Cc: tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>>; web <web@dpdk.org<mailto:web@dpdk.org>>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com>>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com<mailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com>>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com<mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>>; orika <orika@nvidia.com<mailto:orika@nvidia.com>>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com<mailto:guyk@marvell.com>>; 周介龙(卓腾) <jielong.zjl@antfin.com<mailto:jielong.zjl@antfin.com>> > Subject: Re: update of ecosystem page > > +Jielong > > As a developer and user of TLDK, glad to see this topic. > > Recently, we have added more features into TLDK, like SACK, fixed 10+ bugs, and deployed TLDK into online applications. > From our side, we would continue to use and invest TLDK, and open source what we have in TLDK. > > As you can see in our case, TLDK and DPDK can be used in cloud-native env, besides network-type application, like LB, DNS, etc. > It's a much larger deployment than the later sitting at the data center edge or telecom boxes. > > In all, we'd like to see TLDK shown in this page, and more users can reference it. As for TLDK vs TLDKv2, now we > definitely use TLDKv2. Considering that TLDKv2 provides both l4p and socket interface, I personally think we can move on to TLDKv2. > Konstantin, what's your opinion? > > Thanks, > Jianfeng > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net%3cmailto:thomas@monjalon.net>>> > Send Time:2020年11月9日(星期一) 19:19 > To:Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org%3cmailto:jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>>> > Cc:tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org%3cmailto:tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>>>; web <web@dpdk.org<mailto:web@dpdk.org<mailto:web@dpdk.org%3cmailto:web@dpdk.org>>>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com<mailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com%3cmailto:konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>>>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf@antfin.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com<mailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com%3cmailto:henry.tjf@antfin.com>>>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang@microsoft.com<mailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com<mailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com%3cmailto:irene.zhang@microsoft.com>>>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com<mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com<mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com%3cmailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>>>; orika <orika@nvidia.com<mailto:orika@nvidia.com<mailto:orika@nvidia.com%3cmailto:orika@nvidia.com>>>; guyk <guyk@marvell.com<mailto:guyk@marvell.com<mailto:guyk@marvell.com%3cmailto:guyk@marvell.com>>> > Subject:update of ecosystem page > > Hi, > > I'm looking to update the ecosystem page: > https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/ > > In the list of projects using DPDK, > - ANS got a website: http://www.ansyun.com/ > - F-Stack is missing: http://www.f-stack.org/ > - TLDK is missing: https://github.com/FDio/tldk/ > Should we prefer TLDKv2? https://github.com/FDio/tldk/tree/dev-next-socket > - demikernel/catnip is missing: https://github.com/demikernel/demikernel/tree/master/src/rust/catnip > > In the list of device classes, we are missing: > - Regular Expression Engine > - vHost Data Path Acceleration > > Thanks > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-11 16:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-11-09 11:18 [dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page Thomas Monjalon 2020-11-10 2:54 ` 谈鉴锋 2020-11-10 9:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin 2020-12-09 18:33 ` Thomas Monjalon 2020-12-10 3:18 ` 谈鉴锋 2020-12-10 9:20 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).