From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B931FA00C2; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:46:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F83740151; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:46:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227DA4014F for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:46:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AF135E for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:46:20 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 8AF135E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1669794380; bh=hOQWUFh0GB43hqwoOe/04MARGon7OL6EbF05ImsnETA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Wsprk7RiAWX9w/x8Ux2VTgb+AYMX+x1K2cudanxbmS3nKpXuGobikHKtUNAvbfdjk SkyYvajBYQBW5YlrKnJF86UE6b+7iSnOu9Ilb2QPI0TOxsnNWvUpA8V1T+bLVVRBKy 9ALVYR3bHGQHdgPQ+1Ys0dlkIIjKtDA5FnZ1DltI= Message-ID: <5306c001-c7c8-019c-8cad-f052665dc39c@oktetlabs.ru> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:46:20 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Content-Language: en-US From: Andrew Rybchenko To: "web@dpdk.org" Organization: OKTET Labs Subject: Request to add to DPDK ecosystem - open-source ethdev test harness Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: web-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, I'm sorry for incorrect destination of my previous mail on the topic. We'd like to add extend DPDK ecosystem with a reference to open-source test framework [1] which has good coverage for DPDK ethdev. [1] https://ts-factory.io/ It uses letsencrypt certificate for HTTPs. If it is a problem, please, let me know and we'll sort it out. The test harness successfully finds bugs in a number of ethdev drivers. See the list of reported bugs below: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1108 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1109 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1110 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1111 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1113 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1115 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1125 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1126 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1134 Expectations for the most of bugs above were added to the database. So, corresponding failures are not reported as unexpected any more. Logs for some NICs and DPDK 22.11 are available. Yes, there are many unexpected results which require classification/analysis. Some looks like corresponding ethdev driver from my point of view. Andrew.