From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dneary@redhat.com> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03894199B6; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:40:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302907E44F; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 302907E44F Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=dneary@redhat.com Received: from dhcp-41-137.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-124-126.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.124.126]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59EA383085; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org References: <CAFXL6f9h6tSvP+cErZfC+51Oaj=PWirtsZwUiog0o9YJWtzdeQ@mail.gmail.com> <20171018150431.17200-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20171018150431.17200-3-thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: web@dpdk.org, govboard@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org From: Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5b844cbe-19ed-df6e-4955-3ed5a3c88ab4@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:40:39 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171018150431.17200-3-thomas@monjalon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH 2/3] update Technical Board responsibility wording X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance <web.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/web>, <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/web/> List-Post: <mailto:web@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/web>, <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:42 -0000 Hi, I had a concern about this one expressed to me, which I sent to the govboard list and did not see any response - "shall be" is more rigorous language than "is" - changing this does not improve the document at all, and creates potential legal loopholes/confusion. I would prefer this specific change not to be made. Thanks, Dave. On 10/18/2017 11:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Linux Foundation asks to replace "shall" by "is" > for technical decision responsibility. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> > --- > about/charter.html | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/about/charter.html b/about/charter.html > index 7308384..235ebba 100644 > --- a/about/charter.html > +++ b/about/charter.html > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ > > <h4 id="techscope">Scope</h4> > <p> > - The Technical Board shall be responsible technical decision making > + The Technical Board is responsible for technical decision making > for the DPDK project. > Its scope does not include the other sub-projects > hosted on dpdk.org (Pktgen, SPP etc.). > -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338