From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dneary@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03894199B6;
 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302907E44F;
 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 302907E44F
Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com;
 spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=dneary@redhat.com
Received: from dhcp-41-137.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-124-126.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.10.124.126])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59EA383085;
 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:40 +0000 (UTC)
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAFXL6f9h6tSvP+cErZfC+51Oaj=PWirtsZwUiog0o9YJWtzdeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171018150431.17200-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
 <20171018150431.17200-3-thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: web@dpdk.org, govboard@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org
From: Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <5b844cbe-19ed-df6e-4955-3ed5a3c88ab4@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:40:39 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171018150431.17200-3-thomas@monjalon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH 2/3] update Technical Board responsibility
 wording
X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK website maintenance <web.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/web>,
 <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/web/>
List-Post: <mailto:web@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/web>,
 <mailto:web-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:40:42 -0000

Hi,

I had a concern about this one expressed to me, which I sent to the
govboard list and did not see any response - "shall be" is more rigorous
language than "is" - changing this does not improve the document at all,
and creates potential legal loopholes/confusion.

I would prefer this specific change not to be made.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 10/18/2017 11:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Linux Foundation asks to replace "shall" by "is"
> for technical decision responsibility.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> ---
>  about/charter.html | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/about/charter.html b/about/charter.html
> index 7308384..235ebba 100644
> --- a/about/charter.html
> +++ b/about/charter.html
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
>  
>  <h4 id="techscope">Scope</h4>
>  <p>
> -	The Technical Board shall be responsible technical decision making
> +	The Technical Board is responsible for technical decision making
>  	for the DPDK project.
>  	Its scope does not include the other sub-projects
>  	hosted on dpdk.org (Pktgen, SPP etc.).
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338