From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92CAA04F2 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:07:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A935A1BF7B; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:07:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC5D1BF7B for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:07:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81C622688; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:07:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:07:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=JH+nbRnwOjv9zcs1h/Zs2MiwnOj4y8m8VK3uPmoV5FA=; b=RRt3qcNkoAu9 kADwem/vEQlzCj5Gi8wt6E8cBTM/QiJeqGjmVAEBCKvGHbN1mQBwNIc+5XCwkEQK Mbbar2AldFdcj4IXNL0SAvm9e3B5px1Z7ugXpEIAWSRTTvCmNQC8KMxLpkF6AQ+l cnuPtgSsok973y9M7UpNEEx88Vp+mU4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=JH+nbRnwOjv9zcs1h/Zs2MiwnOj4y8m8VK3uPmoV5 FA=; b=AAGXzDy+fLEHHasM5C9m5h14eE7lGYqyoR4CmyAcRLYAz6iJEPpMFIv5f pbOW89wNkzWgNqLPx2lZt5gDW/EggijgOEM/VSo1fKRNlX7Ns7lRqM3JdW+IJ5TV IKjeD00atpVe8bcbD+ZjVvnpEQK2FEdelWl+Be5UxUu5qJ2WzG4oexQijk7xeNRE RKQ7gsOontY4xcIga4apOINRAaZJ7/ATrSi9Ar7H7rvzcnPcMPG9/BWBf85PUWNH I+Kpb5WT1TWOP09mTVL6vTNFitM/+S44ZPAq2iacqXm8HnVW0lkbk0QoUEmvo6nm 7EuWvC3Ps/DBgBO4+u7vCxA60t+1g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudekuddgjeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfure dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppe ejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C621A80060; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:07:08 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: jerinj@marvell.com Cc: web@dpdk.org, maen@marvell.com Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:07:07 +0100 Message-ID: <7003307.MebMP3tPVl@xps> In-Reply-To: <20191113160934.87424-1-jerinj@marvell.com> References: <20191113160934.87424-1-jerinj@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [PATCH] update Marvell supported NICs X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: web-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "web" 13/11/2019 17:09, jerinj@marvell.com: > +- [octeontx2] (https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/octeontx2.html) (Marvell OCTEON TX2 family SoCs) > - [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2) > - [mvneta](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvneta.html) (Marvell NETA) > +- [thunderx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/thunderx.html) (CN88XX) > +- [octeontx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/octeontx.html) (CN83XX, CN82XX, CN81XX, CN80XX) > +- [liquidio](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/liquidio.html) (LiquidIO II CN23XX) > +- [bnx2x](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/bnx2x.html) (QLogic 578xx) > +- [qede](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/qede.html) (QLogic FastLinQ QL4xxxx) Usually we sort the list in a chronological or logical order. Shouldn't we move octeontx2 after octeontx? Any other reordering?