From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D58A04B5 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:36:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623801BE83; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:36:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9131BE84 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:36:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id f82so1991109ioa.9 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 06:36:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XzOUjXkpaSHziuzXl0p1WSL7uQ7f+1UiPvkeX1G4oiU=; b=h9rWf2HaqwlBX+NfHVT0rKAaImfKqdmh5of7kKKyYgfQ4c4ZNm5H4kCnUbml249i3K w9oAR7hPe7cIz/GLNXRhK2b5bXZBYncsIIVrYSlJIAuIzKxl2xz4Wv1BsOqHJDKcN8/P OP0TLMIGakLli4UFHiA5XD6bnSiDqwubtplyk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XzOUjXkpaSHziuzXl0p1WSL7uQ7f+1UiPvkeX1G4oiU=; b=Lt82z19YUd4MUseMSwtdRQitsEJoBin/ERjkVm+278ONVXzKKG0Soji3p8zXEunCem sGDD6vcFHP7LWfkUFuo8JT2X5DuWhlp9vDdJPqQtyWRzLKCu4/eZXDEFIgIi9LpWifMg DHLjANOjsKup2bkRTGOwnAm3iwuM/xtWEi86gPxZ/ZMzkBrF+F8vswxcjKfoshMfzguQ 3sCE4LeQITE2O6UH/qFSXe+nGZOn5JxeDiNIBRe/nNm7b0QeFpGTGABm5VPW9qEk5V9v vSjYzAwi1YCzsAQxp9K2CEXXUbKdIoWd42e7VlmgYw7kZTxhE5jJqSvXGkN7+jWvCs+X reyw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWMuWhUVMIi5l7xk0N9CmleiuivAUXgGFdw0SDzSS16YVQCmr4j pGgUX5Oml72AStkL+C8H12ZmlE+7VRUq6EPLh4CmKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6pEUDUndy3VUY9eQUZk2wjX7FIdpNHApdPI98yo2BXrrM4eJoum9UHQ5+7EJj16Mrb61xN7egREfgzLE0Mpc= X-Received: by 2002:a02:85e8:: with SMTP id d95mr750589jai.92.1575297379111; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 06:36:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3395816.fun287xAU0@xps> In-Reply-To: <3395816.fun287xAU0@xps> From: Trishan de Lanerolle Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:07:40 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , dpdk-web , Jill Lovato , dpdk-techboard Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] Hosted project X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: web-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "web" Yes. The licensing should be the same. If not, an exception from the board is required. It would be good to give clarification around what type of projects would be hosted by us as DPDK. How do they tie back to DPDK and what value do they bring, for instance. Trishan On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 3:01 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 02/12/2019 13:14, Ferruh Yigit: > > Hi Trishan, Thomas, > > > > What do you think documenting process of hosting a project under > dpdk.org in the > > hosted projects page [1] ? > > > > I think it can be something like that: > > " > > Hosting a project under dpdk.org requires the Technical Board approval, > please > > send the project hosting requests to techboard@dpdk.org. > > " > > I agree, it is required. > > > Not sure if we should list the required conditions (licensing, purpose, > > maturity, etc...) for hosting a project, if so we should define them > fist J, > > cc'ed tech board for it. > > I think the code of all projects should comply with the same rules > as DPDK (BSD and/or GPL). > Trishan, do you confirm? > > > ,