Hi Thomas This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old. Why not testing a more recent one? => We have already conducted testing using the new DPDK 25.03. Please refer to the attached report. Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised. Are you going to submit some code? => 1. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to meet customer expectations, as they want to download AEWIN’s DPDK test reports directly from the official DPDK website. The reason is that customers want to know whether AEWIN’s validated DPDK throughput meets the recognition of DPDK.org. 2. Our network cards are based on the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are aligned with Intel’s. 3. The main difference is that AEWIN NICs use PCIe Gen4 x8, whereas Intel’s design uses Gen4 x16. Best Regards James Huang / SI Engineer DQA Team AEWIN Technologies Co., Ltd. Tel:+886-2-8692-6677  EXT:2011 -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Monjalon Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 5:07 PM To: James Cc: web@dpdk.org; james_huang黃啟軒 Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports [You don't often get email from thomas@monjalon.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello and welcome, 26/05/2025 10:11, James: > --- a/content/perf-reports/_index.md > +++ b/content/perf-reports/_index.md > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ title = "Performance Reports" > weight = "7" > +++ > > ++-[DPDK 23.03 Aewin NIC Performance Report] > ++ > ++(//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_03_Aewin_NIC_performance_report.pd > ++f) This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old. Why not testing a more recent one? Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised. Are you going to submit some code?