[PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[James]

Signed-off-by: James <james_huang@aewin.com>
---
 content/perf-reports/_index.md | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/content/perf-reports/_index.md b/content/perf-reports/_index.md
index 6fa71bb..e3d95d2 100644
--- a/content/perf-reports/_index.md
+++ b/content/perf-reports/_index.md
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ title = "Performance Reports"
 weight = "7"
 +++
 
++-[DPDK 23.03 Aewin NIC Performance Report]
++ (//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_03_Aewin_NIC_performance_report.pdf)
 - [DPDK 25.03 Intel NIC Performance Report]
   (//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_25_03_Intel_NIC_performance_report.pdf)
 - [DPDK 24.11 Broadcom NIC Performance Report]
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[Thomas Monjalon]

Hello and welcome,

26/05/2025 10:11, James:
> --- a/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> +++ b/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ title = "Performance Reports"
>  weight = "7"
>  +++
>  
> ++-[DPDK 23.03 Aewin NIC Performance Report]
> ++ (//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_03_Aewin_NIC_performance_report.pdf)

This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
Why not testing a more recent one?

Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK,
so I'm very surprised.
Are you going to submit some code?

RE: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[james_huang黃啟軒]

Hi Thomas

This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
Why not testing a more recent one?

=> Since the Intel E810 uses DPDK version 23.03, we followed its procedures to validate AEWIN NICs accordingly.

Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised.
Are you going to submit some code?
=> Our company's NICs use the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are based on Intel's. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to increase our company's visibility, allowing our customers to download our performance reports directly from the DPDK website. It also signifies that Intel recognizes the DPDK performance of AEWIN NICs.


Best Regards

James Huang / SI Engineer
DQA Team 
AEWIN Technologies Co., Ltd.
Tel:+886-2-8692-6677  EXT:2011



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 5:07 PM
To: James <csoscar2002@gmail.com>
Cc: web@dpdk.org; james_huang黃啟軒 <james_huang@aewin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[You don't often get email from thomas@monjalon.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hello and welcome,

26/05/2025 10:11, James:
> --- a/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> +++ b/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ title = "Performance Reports"
>  weight = "7"
>  +++
>
> ++-[DPDK 23.03 Aewin NIC Performance Report]
> ++ 
> ++(//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_03_Aewin_NIC_performance_report.pd
> ++f)

This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
Why not testing a more recent one?

Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised.
Are you going to submit some code?

Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[Thomas Monjalon]

OK, thank you for the explanations.

So AEWIN NICs can be used with the DPDK drivers i40e and ice
without any modification?
Don't you have different PCI IDs?


26/05/2025 11:25, james_huang黃啟軒:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
> 
> > This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
> > Why not testing a more recent one?
> 
> => Since the Intel E810 uses DPDK version 23.03, we followed its procedures to validate AEWIN NICs accordingly.

For information, Intel E810 NIC can be use with any DPDK version
since 19.02, including the recent 25.03.

> > Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very
> > surprised. Are you going to submit some code?
> 
> => Our company's NICs use the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are based on Intel's. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to increase our company's visibility, allowing our customers to download our performance reports directly from the DPDK website. It also signifies that Intel recognizes the DPDK performance of AEWIN NICs.

RE: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[james_huang黃啟軒]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2069 bytes --]

Hi Thomas

Yes, please refer to the attached file. 

We created the AEWIN NICs Performance Report with DPDK 23.03 based on the DPDK_23_03_Intel_NIC_performance_report.

The report provides complete details, including the use of Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, as well as Device ID 8086:1592、086:1572. 

The drivers used are Ubuntu’s built-in i40e and ice, which no additional driver installation is necessary.


Best Regards

James Huang / SI Engineer
DQA Team 
AEWIN Technologies Co., Ltd.
Tel:+886-2-8692-6677  EXT:2011



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 6:02 PM
To: james_huang黃啟軒 <james_huang@aewin.com>
Cc: web@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




OK, thank you for the explanations.

So AEWIN NICs can be used with the DPDK drivers i40e and ice without any modification?
Don't you have different PCI IDs?


26/05/2025 11:25, james_huang黃啟軒:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>
> > This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
> > Why not testing a more recent one?
>
> => Since the Intel E810 uses DPDK version 23.03, we followed its procedures to validate AEWIN NICs accordingly.

For information, Intel E810 NIC can be use with any DPDK version since 19.02, including the recent 25.03.

> > Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm 
> > very surprised. Are you going to submit some code?
>
> => Our company's NICs use the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are based on Intel's. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to increase our company's visibility, allowing our customers to download our performance reports directly from the DPDK website. It also signifies that Intel recognizes the DPDK performance of AEWIN NICs.




[-- Attachment #2: AEWIN NICs Performance Report with DPDK 23.03.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 803139 bytes --]

RE: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[james_huang黃啟軒]

Hi Thomas

We sent a PDF report on May 26. This report is large and requires your approval before it can be received.

We created the AEWIN NIC performance report using DPDK 23.03 based on the DPDK_23_03_Intel_NIC_performance_report document.

The report provides full details including the use of Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, and device IDs 8086:1592, 8086:1572.

The drivers used are i40e and ice built into Ubuntu, no additional installation is required.

Best Regards

James Huang / SI Engineer
DQA Team 
AEWIN Technologies Co., Ltd.
Tel:+886-2-8692-6677  EXT:2011



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 6:02 PM
To: james_huang黃啟軒 <james_huang@aewin.com>
Cc: web@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




OK, thank you for the explanations.

So AEWIN NICs can be used with the DPDK drivers i40e and ice without any modification?
Don't you have different PCI IDs?


26/05/2025 11:25, james_huang黃啟軒:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>
> > This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
> > Why not testing a more recent one?
>
> => Since the Intel E810 uses DPDK version 23.03, we followed its procedures to validate AEWIN NICs accordingly.

For information, Intel E810 NIC can be use with any DPDK version since 19.02, including the recent 25.03.

> > Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm 
> > very surprised. Are you going to submit some code?
>
> => Our company's NICs use the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are based on Intel's. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to increase our company's visibility, allowing our customers to download our performance reports directly from the DPDK website. It also signifies that Intel recognizes the DPDK performance of AEWIN NICs.

RE: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[james_huang黃啟軒]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2127 bytes --]

Hi Thomas

This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
Why not testing a more recent one?
=> We have already conducted testing using the new DPDK 25.03. Please refer to the attached report.

Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised.
Are you going to submit some code?
=> 
1. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to meet customer expectations, as they want to download AEWIN’s DPDK test reports directly from the official DPDK website. The reason is that customers want to know whether AEWIN’s validated DPDK throughput meets the recognition of DPDK.org.
2. Our network cards are based on the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are aligned with Intel’s. 
3. The main difference is that AEWIN NICs use PCIe Gen4 x8, whereas Intel’s design uses Gen4 x16.



Best Regards

James Huang / SI Engineer
DQA Team 
AEWIN Technologies Co., Ltd.
Tel:+886-2-8692-6677  EXT:2011




-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 5:07 PM
To: James <csoscar2002@gmail.com>
Cc: web@dpdk.org; james_huang黃啟軒 <james_huang@aewin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[You don't often get email from thomas@monjalon.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hello and welcome,

26/05/2025 10:11, James:
> --- a/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> +++ b/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ title = "Performance Reports"
>  weight = "7"
>  +++
>
> ++-[DPDK 23.03 Aewin NIC Performance Report]
> ++ 
> ++(//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_03_Aewin_NIC_performance_report.pd
> ++f)

This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
Why not testing a more recent one?

Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised.
Are you going to submit some code?



[-- Attachment #2: AEWIN NICs Performance Report with DPDK 25.03.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 799607 bytes --]

RE: [PATCH] add 25.03 Aewin performance reports

[james_huang黃啟軒]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2129 bytes --]


Hi Thomas

This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
Why not testing a more recent one?
=> We have already conducted testing using the new DPDK 25.03. Please refer to the attached report.

Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised.
Are you going to submit some code?
=> 
1. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to meet customer expectations, as they want to download AEWIN’s DPDK test reports directly from the official DPDK website. The reason is that customers want to know whether AEWIN’s validated DPDK throughput meets the recognition of DPDK.org.
2. Our network cards are based on the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are aligned with Intel’s. 
3. The main difference is that AEWIN NICs use PCIe Gen4 x8, whereas Intel’s design uses Gen4 x16.



Best Regards

James Huang / SI Engineer
DQA Team 
AEWIN Technologies Co., Ltd.
Tel:+886-2-8692-6677  EXT:2011




-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> 
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 5:07 PM
To: James <csoscar2002@gmail.com>
Cc: web@dpdk.org; james_huang黃啟軒 <james_huang@aewin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[You don't often get email from thomas@monjalon.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hello and welcome,

26/05/2025 10:11, James:
> --- a/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> +++ b/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ title = "Performance Reports"
>  weight = "7"
>  +++
>
> ++-[DPDK 23.03 Aewin NIC Performance Report]
> ++ 
> ++(//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_03_Aewin_NIC_performance_report.pd
> ++f)

This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
Why not testing a more recent one?

Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very surprised.
Are you going to submit some code?



[-- Attachment #2: AEWIN NICs Performance Report with DPDK 25.03.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 799607 bytes --]

RE: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports

[Mcnamara, John]

Hi,

Now that the report is based on DPDK 25.03 I think that Intel can support the publication of these results.

Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: james_huang黃啟軒 <james_huang@aewin.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 6:12 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Cc: web@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports
> 
> Hi Thomas
> 
> This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
> Why not testing a more recent one?
> => We have already conducted testing using the new DPDK 25.03. Please
> refer to the attached report.
> 
> Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very
> surprised.
> Are you going to submit some code?
> =>
> 1. The purpose of uploading to DPDK.org is to meet customer expectations,
> as they want to download AEWIN’s DPDK test reports directly from the
> official DPDK website. The reason is that customers want to know whether
> AEWIN’s validated DPDK throughput meets the recognition of DPDK.org.
> 2. Our network cards are based on the Intel® XL710-BM1 and Intel® E810-
> CAM2 chipsets, so the drivers are aligned with Intel’s.
> 3. The main difference is that AEWIN NICs use PCIe Gen4 x8, whereas
> Intel’s design uses Gen4 x16.
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> James Huang / SI Engineer
> DQA Team
> AEWIN Technologies Co., Ltd.
> Tel:+886-2-8692-6677  EXT:2011
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 5:07 PM
> To: James <csoscar2002@gmail.com>
> Cc: web@dpdk.org; james_huang黃啟軒 <james_huang@aewin.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] add 23.03 Aewin performance reports
> 
> [You don't often get email from thomas@monjalon.net. Learn why this is
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello and welcome,
> 
> 26/05/2025 10:11, James:
> > --- a/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> > +++ b/content/perf-reports/_index.md
> > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ title = "Performance Reports"
> >  weight = "7"
> >  +++
> >
> > ++-[DPDK 23.03 Aewin NIC Performance Report]
> > ++
> > ++(//fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_03_Aewin_NIC_performance_report.pd
> > ++f)
> 
> This is a test for a DPDK release which is 2 years old.
> Why not testing a more recent one?
> 
> Also, as far as I know, there is no Aewin driver in DPDK, so I'm very
> surprised.
> Are you going to submit some code?
>