From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F30827D; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:41:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4DDA9D; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:41:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com AF4DDA9D Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=dneary@redhat.com Received: from dhcp-41-137.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-124-126.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.124.126]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B69F62523; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:41:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Thomas Monjalon , tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org References: <20171018150431.17200-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20171018150431.17200-3-thomas@monjalon.net> <5b844cbe-19ed-df6e-4955-3ed5a3c88ab4@redhat.com> Cc: web@dpdk.org, govboard@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org From: Dave Neary Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:41:40 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5b844cbe-19ed-df6e-4955-3ed5a3c88ab4@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] [dpdk-govboard] [PATCH 2/3] update Technical Board responsibility wording X-BeenThere: web@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK website maintenance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:41:42 -0000 For clarity, the only part of this change I have an issue with is "s/shall be/is/" Thanks, Dave. On 10/18/2017 11:40 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > I had a concern about this one expressed to me, which I sent to the > govboard list and did not see any response - "shall be" is more rigorous > language than "is" - changing this does not improve the document at all, > and creates potential legal loopholes/confusion. > > I would prefer this specific change not to be made. > > Thanks, > Dave. > > On 10/18/2017 11:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> Linux Foundation asks to replace "shall" by "is" >> for technical decision responsibility. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon >> --- >> about/charter.html | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/about/charter.html b/about/charter.html >> index 7308384..235ebba 100644 >> --- a/about/charter.html >> +++ b/about/charter.html >> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ >> >>

Scope

>>

>> - The Technical Board shall be responsible technical decision making >> + The Technical Board is responsible for technical decision making >> for the DPDK project. >> Its scope does not include the other sub-projects >> hosted on dpdk.org (Pktgen, SPP etc.). >> > -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338