Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 7/2/2018 11:32 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/28/2018 9:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
>>>>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Applied, thanks
>>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web page, it may
>>> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?
>>
>> Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
>> I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org (see the patch below).
> 
> Looks good, thanks.
> 
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>>
>>> And supported hardware information is presented in two different location in
>>> webpage:
>>> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
>>> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
>>>
>>> Can we reduce it into single place?
>>> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?
>>
>> I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of vendors.
>> I think we don't need all the details here.
>> As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in core.dpdk.org.
>> And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and precisely with patches.
>>
>> I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and other HW,
>> and point to the core.dpdk.org page for details.
> 
> +1

"https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware" is still there and XXV710 is still
missing!

What is the process of updating LF managed web pages? Is someone tracking this
mail list?

> 
>>
>>
>>> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is almost not
>>> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can we fix it?
>>
>> Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux Foundation.
>> I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
>> There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on the name.
>> Example:
>> 	https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/
> 
> Yes this page look better, I think it is better to have similar view in support
> page.
> 
>>
>>
>> ---------------------
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
>>  - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571, 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
>>  - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576, 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
>>  - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599, X520, X540, X550)
>> -- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722)
>> +- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722, XXV710)
>>  - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
>>  
>>  {{% notice note %}}
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
>> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>>  weight = "8"
>>  +++
>>  
>> -- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
>> +- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
>> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
>>  +++
>>  
>>  - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3, ConnectX-3 Pro)
>> -- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
>> +- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)
>>
>> --- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
>> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
>> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>>  weight = "13"
>>  +++
>>  
>> -- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx)
>> +- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)
>>
>>
>>
>