DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chao Zhu" <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "'Thomas Monjalon'" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, "'David Marchand'" <david.marchand@6wind.com>,
	"'Richardson, Bruce'" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"'Panu Matilainen'" <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Fix CPU and memory parameters on IBM POWER8
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:44:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000301d18aee$e86fddf0$b94f99d0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1697595.mIzdCROXzL@xps13>

Thomas,

Seems I didn't get the messages from David. Anyway, I sent out an updated
patch.
Thanks for reminder!

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] 
Sent: 2016年3月30日 18:53
To: Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>; Richardson,
Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Fix CPU and memory parameters on IBM
POWER8

2016-03-25 09:48, David Marchand:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:
> > This patch fixes the max logic number and memory channel number 
> > settings on IBM POWER8 platform.
> > 1. The max number of logic cores of a POWER8 processor is 96. Normally,
> >    there are two sockets on a server. So the max number of logic cores
> >    are 192. So this parch set CONFIG_RTE_MAX_LCORE to 256.
> 
> This is a power8 configuration item, this should go to power8 config 
> file, not common_base.
> 
> > 2. Currently, the max number of memory channels are hardcoded to 4.
However,
> >    on a POWER8 machine, the max number of memory channels are 8. To fix
this,
> >    CONFIG_RTE_MAX_NCHANNELS is added to do the configuration.
> 
> I don't see any reason why we would need a max value for force_nchannel.
> We should just get rid of this check, this is an obscure parameter for 
> most people, so people playing with it know what they are doing 
> (hopefully ?).
> 
> On the other hand, if power8 has some specifics about it, maybe we 
> should introduce some default value in a arch eal header for other 
> dpdk components to use (like in mempool).
> Thoughts ?

Chao? We are running out of time for 16.04.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-25  8:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Fix parameters and prefetch function " Chao Zhu
2016-03-25  8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Fix CPU and memory parameters " Chao Zhu
2016-03-25  8:48   ` David Marchand
2016-03-30 10:52     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-31  1:44       ` Chao Zhu [this message]
2016-03-25  8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Fix prefetch instruction " Chao Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000301d18aee$e86fddf0$b94f99d0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com' \
    --to=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).