DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix the hash filter invalid calculation in X722
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:11:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01BA8470C017D6468C8290E4B9C5E1E838FB7700@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F80E293A6B@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

I will refine the commit log. Other hand,  since the issue is not directly related with prior patch, it just because some nic type adding request some special behavior handle. So it is reported issue fix, but may be have not corresponding fix line. Thanks jingjing's review. 

Best regards,
Jeff Guo


-----Original Message-----
From: Wu, Jingjing 
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 5:10 PM
To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix the hash filter invalid calculation in X722


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Jia
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:49 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing 
> <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh 
> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix the hash filter invalid calculation in 
> X722
> 
> As X722 extracts IPv4 header to Field Vector different with 
> XL710/X710, need to corresponding to modify the fields of IPv4 header 
> in input set to map different default Field Vector Table of different NICs.
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
> ---
> v3:
> remove the x722 macro
> v2:
> fix compile error when x722 macro is not defined and simplify the code 
> to avoid duplication.
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 60 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

How about change the commit log it like:

When verifying the Hash filtering on X722, we found the behavior was not expected. For example, the hash value in descriptor is incorrect.
That was because X722 uses different way of hash key word selection comparing with X710/XL710.
This patch fixes it by setting X722 specific key selection.

And few minor comments:

If this is not the first patch, please use [PATCH v3] instead of [PATCH].
And the fixes line is missed.

Thanks
Jingijng

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-25  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-26 10:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] drivers/i40e: " Jeff Guo
2016-09-29  6:29 ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-09-29 18:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-09-30  6:05   ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-09-30  9:09     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-10-16  1:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers/i40e: fix X722 macro absence result in compile Jeff Guo
2016-10-16  1:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers/i40e: fix the hash filter invalid calculation in X722 Jeff Guo
2016-10-18 16:25     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-10-20  2:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: " Jeff Guo
2016-10-24  9:10       ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-10-25  2:11         ` Guo, Jia [this message]
2016-10-25  2:26       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Jeff Guo
2016-10-25  2:42       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/i40e: fix hash filter invalid issue " Jeff Guo
2016-10-25 10:22         ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-10-25 12:29           ` Bruce Richardson
2016-10-16 13:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers/i40e: fix X722 macro absence result in compile Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-10-17  7:44     ` Guo, Jia
2016-10-17  9:54       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-10-17 10:14         ` Chilikin, Andrey
2016-10-18 16:22         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-10-19  6:10           ` Guo, Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01BA8470C017D6468C8290E4B9C5E1E838FB7700@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).