DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>,
	"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] telemetry: fix "in-memory" process socket conflicts
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:47:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04917987-5599-811d-9919-e4617330c331@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929135438.3091033-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

On 9/29/2021 2:54 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> When DPDK is run with --in-memory mode, multiple processes can run
> simultaneously using the same runtime dir. This leads to each process,
> as it starts up, removing the telemetry socket of another process,
> giving unexpected behaviour.
> 
> This patch changes that behaviour to first check if the existing socket
> is active. If not, it's an old socket to be cleaned up and can be
> removed. If it is active, telemetry initialization fails and an error
> message is printed out giving instructions on how to remove the error;
> either by using file-prefix to have a different runtime dir (and
> therefore socket path) or by disabling telemetry if it not needed.
> 
> Fixes: 6dd571fd07c3 ("telemetry: introduce new functionality")
> 
> Reported-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>

Off the topic.

This is the patch 100.000 in patchwork! Wow, that is huge.

This may be something to celebrate on next face to face meeting.
And I assume Bruce will be buying as the owner of the patch 100000 :)

https://patches.dpdk.org/api/1.2/patches/100000/

The historical numbers from DPDK patchwork:
100000 - Sept. 29, 2021 (184 days) [ 6 months / 26 weeks and 2 days ]
  90000 - March 29, 2021 (172 days)
  80000 - Oct.   8, 2020 (153 days)
  70000 - May    8, 2020 (224 days)
  60000 - Sept. 27, 2019 (248 days)
  50000 - Jan.  22, 2019 (253 days)
  40000 - May   14, 2018 (217 days)
  30000 - Oct.   9, 2017 (258 days)
  20000 - Jan.  25, 2017 (372 days)
  10000 - Jan.  20, 2016 (645 days)
  00001 - April 16, 2014

Last two years average is 10K patch in ~185 days, that is more patch per day
comparing to previous years.
Not sure if this is Covid-19 effect or simply DPDK is getting more popular.

Thanks again to all contributors.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-05 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-15 14:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bruce Richardson
2021-09-22  8:43 ` Power, Ciara
2021-09-24 16:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2021-09-29  8:50   ` Power, Ciara
2021-09-29 12:28   ` Kevin Traynor
2021-09-29 13:32     ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-29 13:51       ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-29 14:54       ` Kevin Traynor
2021-09-29 15:24         ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-29 15:31           ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-29 16:01             ` Kevin Traynor
2021-09-29 13:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 11:47   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-10-01 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] improve telemetry support with in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 11:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] eal: limit telemetry to primary processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 11:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] telemetry: fix deletion of active sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 11:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] telemetry: use unique socket paths for in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 11:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: connect to in-memory processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 11:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: provide info on available sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 16:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] improve telemetry support with in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 16:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] eal: limit telemetry to primary processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 16:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] telemetry: fix deletion of active sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 16:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] telemetry: use unique socket paths for in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 16:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: connect to in-memory processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-01 16:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: provide info on available sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 13:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/5] improve telemetry support with in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 13:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/5] eal: limit telemetry to primary processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-07 13:11     ` Power, Ciara
2021-10-05 13:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/5] telemetry: fix deletion of active sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 15:18     ` Conor Walsh
2021-10-05 13:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/5] telemetry: use unique socket paths for in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 14:41     ` Kevin Traynor
2021-10-05 14:52       ` Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 15:14         ` Kevin Traynor
2021-10-07 13:39           ` Power, Ciara
2021-10-05 15:19         ` Conor Walsh
2021-10-05 13:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: connect to in-memory processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 15:19     ` Conor Walsh
2021-10-05 13:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: provide info on available sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-05 15:19     ` Conor Walsh
2021-10-08 17:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/5] improve telemetry support with in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-08 17:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/5] eal: limit telemetry to primary processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-08 17:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/5] telemetry: fix deletion of active sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-08 17:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/5] telemetry: use unique socket paths for in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-12 15:37     ` Power, Ciara
2021-10-12 15:40       ` Bruce Richardson
2021-10-12 15:47         ` Power, Ciara
2021-10-08 17:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: connect to separate instances Bruce Richardson
2021-10-12 15:37     ` Power, Ciara
2021-10-08 17:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/5] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: provide info on available sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-12 15:37     ` Power, Ciara
2021-10-12 16:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] improve telemetry support with in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-12 16:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] eal: limit telemetry to primary processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-13 13:15     ` Walsh, Conor
2021-10-12 16:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] telemetry: fix socket path conflicts for in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-13 13:15     ` Walsh, Conor
2021-10-14  9:40     ` Kevin Traynor
2021-10-12 16:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: connect to separate instances Bruce Richardson
2021-10-13 13:15     ` Walsh, Conor
2021-10-12 16:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: provide info on available sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-13 13:15     ` Walsh, Conor
2021-10-14 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] improve telemetry support with in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-14 10:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] eal: limit telemetry to primary processes Bruce Richardson
2021-10-14 10:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] telemetry: fix socket path conflicts for in-memory mode Bruce Richardson
2021-10-14 10:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: connect to separate instances Bruce Richardson
2021-10-14 10:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] usertools/dpdk-telemetry: provide info on available sockets Bruce Richardson
2021-10-14 19:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] improve telemetry support with in-memory mode David Marchand
2021-10-15  8:18     ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=04917987-5599-811d-9919-e4617330c331@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).