From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Xiao" <xiao.zhang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [v2] drivers/net: fix dereference after null check coverity
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:26:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09bb88fd-adfc-01bb-b893-a02cd65e8cf7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF0377F445CB2540BB46FF359C1C1BBE0116B23F@SHSMSX105.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 7/16/2019 1:19 PM, Zhang, Xiao wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 7:55 PM
>> To: Zhang, Xiao <xiao.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Wang, Xiao W
>> <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Lu,
>> Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>;
>> stable@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [v2] drivers/net: fix dereference after null check
>> coverity
>>
>> On 7/15/2019 1:15 PM, Xiao Zhang wrote:
>>> This patch tries to fix the coverity issues of dereference after null
>>> check.
>>> The addresses of receive queue start segment for ice, avf, i40e, fm10k
>>> and ixgb were not checked before use. Add check to avoid coverity
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Coverity issue: 343452
>>> Coverity issue: 343407
>>> Fixes: c68a52b8 ("net/ice: support vector SSE in Rx") Coverity issue:
>>> 343447
>>> Fixes: 319c421f ("net/avf: enable SSE Rx Tx") Coverity issue: 343422
>>> Coverity issue: 343403
>>> Fixes: ca74903b ("net/i40e: extract non-x86 specific code from vector
>>> driver") Coverity issue: 343416
>>> Fixes: fe65e1e1 ("fm10k: add vector scatter Rx") Coverity issue: 13245
>>> Fixes: 8a44c15a ("net/ixgbe: extract non-x86 specific code from vector
>>> driver")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
>>
>> In patchwork status of this patch is "Superseded" but I can't find the patch
>> that supersedes this patch, is the current status correct?
>
> Sorry, the status of the patch should be "Rejected", I have updated the status.
>
Thanks for updating, why it is rejected? (self-rejected ?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-16 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-15 12:15 Xiao Zhang
2019-07-16 11:55 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-07-16 12:19 ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-16 14:26 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-07-16 14:35 ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-16 14:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-07-17 1:47 ` Zhang, Xiao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09bb88fd-adfc-01bb-b893-a02cd65e8cf7@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=xiao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).