From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Xu, Rosen" <rosen.xu@intel.com>,
"dave.burley@accelercomm.com" <dave.burley@accelercomm.com>,
"aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com" <aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Liu, Tianjiao" <tianjiao.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:18:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d31a887-6a52-d885-8b50-486d573f5975@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4451515542DE7A0C8E57367EF8330@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 9/30/20 3:54 PM, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>> On 9/28/20 5:29 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
>>> Add configure function to configure the PF from within the
>>> bbdev-test itself without external application configuration the device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
>>> Acked-by: Liu Tianjiao <Tianjiao.liu@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 72 +++
>>> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 5 +
>>> drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build | 2 +
>>> drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h | 17 +
>>> drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 505
>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> .../acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map | 7 +
>>> 6 files changed, 608 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>> b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>> index 45c0d62..32f23ff 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>> @@ -52,6 +52,18 @@
>>> #define FLR_5G_TIMEOUT 610
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_BBDEV_ACC100
>>> +#include <rte_acc100_cfg.h>
>>> +#define ACC100PF_DRIVER_NAME ("intel_acc100_pf")
>>> +#define ACC100VF_DRIVER_NAME ("intel_acc100_vf")
>>> +#define ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS 16
>>> +#define ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS 2
>>> +#define ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH 5
>>> +#define ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX -1
>>> +#define ACC100_QMGR_RR 1
>>> +#define ACC100_QOS_GBR 0
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> #define OPS_CACHE_SIZE 256U
>>> #define OPS_POOL_SIZE_MIN 511U /* 0.5K per queue */
>>>
>>> @@ -653,6 +665,66 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
>> active_device *ad,
>>> info->dev_name);
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_BBDEV_ACC100
>> seems like this function would break if one of the other bbdev's were
>> #defined.
> No these are independent. By default they are all defined.
ok
>
>
>>> + if ((get_init_device() == true) &&
>>> + (!strcmp(info->drv.driver_name,
>> ACC100PF_DRIVER_NAME))) {
>>> + struct acc100_conf conf;
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>> +
>>> + printf("Configure ACC100 FEC Driver %s with default
>> values\n",
>>> + info->drv.driver_name);
>>> +
>>> + /* clear default configuration before initialization */
>>> + memset(&conf, 0, sizeof(struct acc100_conf));
>>> +
>>> + /* Always set in PF mode for built-in configuration */
>>> + conf.pf_mode_en = true;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < RTE_ACC100_NUM_VFS; ++i) {
>>> + conf.arb_dl_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_dl_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_dl_4g[i].round_robin_weight =
>> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
>>> + conf.arb_ul_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_ul_4g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_ul_4g[i].round_robin_weight =
>> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
>>> + conf.arb_dl_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_dl_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_dl_5g[i].round_robin_weight =
>> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
>>> + conf.arb_ul_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_ul_5g[i].gbr_threshold1 =
>> ACC100_QOS_GBR;
>>> + conf.arb_ul_5g[i].round_robin_weight =
>> ACC100_QMGR_RR;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + conf.input_pos_llr_1_bit = true;
>>> + conf.output_pos_llr_1_bit = true;
>>> + conf.num_vf_bundles = 1; /**< Number of VF bundles to
>> setup */
>>> +
>>> + conf.q_ul_4g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
>>> + conf.q_ul_4g.first_qgroup_index =
>> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
>>> + conf.q_ul_4g.num_aqs_per_groups =
>> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
>>> + conf.q_ul_4g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
>>> + conf.q_dl_4g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
>>> + conf.q_dl_4g.first_qgroup_index =
>> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
>>> + conf.q_dl_4g.num_aqs_per_groups =
>> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
>>> + conf.q_dl_4g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
>>> + conf.q_ul_5g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
>>> + conf.q_ul_5g.first_qgroup_index =
>> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
>>> + conf.q_ul_5g.num_aqs_per_groups =
>> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
>>> + conf.q_ul_5g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
>>> + conf.q_dl_5g.num_qgroups = ACC100_QMGR_NUM_QGS;
>>> + conf.q_dl_5g.first_qgroup_index =
>> ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX;
>>> + conf.q_dl_5g.num_aqs_per_groups =
>> ACC100_QMGR_NUM_AQS;
>>> + conf.q_dl_5g.aq_depth_log2 = ACC100_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH;
>>> +
>>> + /* setup PF with configuration information */
>>> + ret = acc100_configure(info->dev_name, &conf);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret,
>>> + "Failed to configure ACC100 PF for bbdev
>> %s",
>>> + info->dev_name);
>>> + /* Let's refresh this now this is configured */
>>> + }
>>> + rte_bbdev_info_get(dev_id, info);
>> The other bbdev's do not call rte_bbdev_info_get, can this be removed ?
> Actually it should be added outside for all versions post-configuraion. Thanks
>
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> nb_queues = RTE_MIN(rte_lcore_count(), info- drv.max_num_queues);
>>> nb_queues = RTE_MIN(nb_queues, (unsigned int) MAX_QUEUES);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
>>> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
>>> index 73ac08f..c8d0586 100644
>>> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
>>> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ New Features
>>> Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
>>> =======================================================
>>>
>>> +* **Added Intel ACC100 bbdev PMD.**
>>> +
>>> + Added a new ``acc100`` bbdev driver for the Intel\ |reg| ACC100
>>> + accelerator also known as Mount Bryce. See the
>>> + :doc:`../bbdevs/acc100` BBDEV guide for more details on this new driver.
>>>
>>> Removed Items
>>> -------------
>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
>>> index 8afafc2..7ac44dc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
>>> @@ -4,3 +4,5 @@
>>> deps += ['bbdev', 'bus_vdev', 'ring', 'pci', 'bus_pci']
>>>
>>> sources = files('rte_acc100_pmd.c')
>>> +
>>> +install_headers('rte_acc100_cfg.h')
>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
>>> index 73bbe36..7f523bc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_cfg.h
>>> @@ -89,6 +89,23 @@ struct acc100_conf {
>>> struct rte_arbitration_t arb_dl_5g[RTE_ACC100_NUM_VFS]; };
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * Configure a ACC100 device
>>> + *
>>> + * @param dev_name
>>> + * The name of the device. This is the short form of PCI BDF, e.g. 00:01.0.
>>> + * It can also be retrieved for a bbdev device from the dev_name field in
>> the
>>> + * rte_bbdev_info structure returned by rte_bbdev_info_get().
>>> + * @param conf
>>> + * Configuration to apply to ACC100 HW.
>>> + *
>>> + * @return
>>> + * Zero on success, negative value on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +__rte_experimental
>>> +int
>>> +acc100_configure(const char *dev_name, struct acc100_conf *conf);
>>> +
>>> #ifdef __cplusplus
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>> index 3589814..b50dd32 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>> @@ -85,6 +85,26 @@
>>>
>>> enum {UL_4G = 0, UL_5G, DL_4G, DL_5G, NUM_ACC};
>>>
>>> +/* Return the accelerator enum for a Queue Group Index */ static
>>> +inline int accFromQgid(int qg_idx, const struct acc100_conf
>>> +*acc100_conf) {
>>> + int accQg[ACC100_NUM_QGRPS];
>>> + int NumQGroupsPerFn[NUM_ACC];
>>> + int acc, qgIdx, qgIndex = 0;
>>> + for (qgIdx = 0; qgIdx < ACC100_NUM_QGRPS; qgIdx++)
>>> + accQg[qgIdx] = 0;
>>> + NumQGroupsPerFn[UL_4G] = acc100_conf->q_ul_4g.num_qgroups;
>>> + NumQGroupsPerFn[UL_5G] = acc100_conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
>>> + NumQGroupsPerFn[DL_4G] = acc100_conf->q_dl_4g.num_qgroups;
>>> + NumQGroupsPerFn[DL_5G] = acc100_conf->q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
>>> + for (acc = UL_4G; acc < NUM_ACC; acc++)
>>> + for (qgIdx = 0; qgIdx < NumQGroupsPerFn[acc]; qgIdx++)
>>> + accQg[qgIndex++] = acc;
>> This looks inefficient, is there a way this could be calculated
>> without filling arrays to
>>
>> access 1 value ?
> That is not time critical, and the same common code is run each time.
ok
>
>>> + acc = accQg[qg_idx];
>>> + return acc;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /* Return the queue topology for a Queue Group Index */ static
>>> inline void qtopFromAcc(struct rte_q_topology_t **qtop, int
>>> acc_enum, @@ -113,6 +133,30 @@
>>> *qtop = p_qtop;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* Return the AQ depth for a Queue Group Index */ static inline int
>>> +aqDepth(int qg_idx, struct acc100_conf *acc100_conf) {
>>> + struct rte_q_topology_t *q_top = NULL;
>>> + int acc_enum = accFromQgid(qg_idx, acc100_conf);
>>> + qtopFromAcc(&q_top, acc_enum, acc100_conf);
>>> + if (unlikely(q_top == NULL))
>>> + return 0;
>> This error is not handled well be the callers.
>>
>> aqNum is similar.
> This fails in a consistent basis, by having not queue available and handling this as the default case.
ok
>
>>> + return q_top->aq_depth_log2;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Return the AQ depth for a Queue Group Index */ static inline int
>>> +aqNum(int qg_idx, struct acc100_conf *acc100_conf) {
>>> + struct rte_q_topology_t *q_top = NULL;
>>> + int acc_enum = accFromQgid(qg_idx, acc100_conf);
>>> + qtopFromAcc(&q_top, acc_enum, acc100_conf);
>>> + if (unlikely(q_top == NULL))
>>> + return 0;
>>> + return q_top->num_aqs_per_groups;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void
>>> initQTop(struct acc100_conf *acc100_conf) { @@ -4177,3 +4221,464
>>> @@ static int acc100_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
>>> RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(ACC100PF_DRIVER_NAME,
>>> pci_id_acc100_pf_map);
>> RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI(ACC100VF_DRIVER_NAME,
>>> acc100_pci_vf_driver);
>>> RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(ACC100VF_DRIVER_NAME,
>>> pci_id_acc100_vf_map);
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Implementation to fix the power on status of some 5GUL engines
>>> + * This requires DMA permission if ported outside DPDK
>> This sounds like a workaround, can more detail be added here ?
> There are comments through the code I believe:
> - /* Detect engines in undefined state */
> - /* Force each engine which is in unspecified state */
> - /* Reset LDPC Cores */
> - /* Check engine power-on status again */ Do you believe this is not explicit enough. Power-on status may be in an undefined state hence this engine are avtivate with dummy payload to make sure they are in a predicable state once configuration is done.
Yes, not explicit enough. They do not say it is a workaround so someone else would not know that
this is needed or is likely needs adjusting in the future. Maybe change
/* Check engine power-on status again */ to
/*
* Power-on status may be in an undefined state.
* Active this engine with a dummy payload to make sure the state is defined.
*/
Tom
>>> + */
>>> +static void
>>> +poweron_cleanup(struct rte_bbdev *bbdev, struct acc100_device *d,
>>> + struct acc100_conf *conf)
>>> +{
>>> + int i, template_idx, qg_idx;
>>> + uint32_t address, status, payload;
>>> + printf("Need to clear power-on 5GUL status in internal memory\n");
>>> + /* Reset LDPC Cores */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
>>> + ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
>> ACC100_RESET_HI);
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
>>> + ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
>> ACC100_RESET_LO);
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT);
>>> + /* Prepare dummy workload */
>>> + alloc_2x64mb_sw_rings_mem(bbdev, d, 0);
>>> + /* Set base addresses */
>>> + uint32_t phys_high = (uint32_t)(d->sw_rings_phys >> 32);
>>> + uint32_t phys_low = (uint32_t)(d->sw_rings_phys &
>>> + ~(ACC100_SIZE_64MBYTE-1));
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfDmaFec5GulDescBaseHiRegVf,
>> phys_high);
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfDmaFec5GulDescBaseLoRegVf, phys_low);
>>> +
>>> + /* Descriptor for a dummy 5GUL code block processing*/
>>> + union acc100_dma_desc *desc = NULL;
>>> + desc = d->sw_rings;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[0].address = d->sw_rings_phys +
>>> + ACC100_DESC_FCW_OFFSET;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[0].blen = ACC100_FCW_LD_BLEN;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[0].blkid = ACC100_DMA_BLKID_FCW;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[0].last = 0;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[0].dma_ext = 0;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[1].address = d->sw_rings_phys + 512;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[1].blkid = ACC100_DMA_BLKID_IN;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[1].last = 1;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[1].dma_ext = 0;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[1].blen = 44;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[2].address = d->sw_rings_phys + 1024;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[2].blkid = ACC100_DMA_BLKID_OUT_ENC;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[2].last = 1;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[2].dma_ext = 0;
>>> + desc->req.data_ptrs[2].blen = 5;
>>> + /* Dummy FCW */
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.FCWversion = ACC100_FCW_VER;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.qm = 1;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.nfiller = 30;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.BG = 2 - 1;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.Zc = 7;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.ncb = 350;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.rm_e = 4;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.itmax = 10;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.gain_i = 1;
>>> + desc->req.fcw_ld.gain_h = 1;
>>> +
>>> + int engines_to_restart[SIG_UL_5G_LAST + 1] = {0};
>>> + int num_failed_engine = 0;
>>> + /* Detect engines in undefined state */
>>> + for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + /* Check engine power-on status */
>>> + address = HwPfFecUl5gIbDebugReg +
>>> + ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * template_idx;
>>> + status = (acc100_reg_read(d, address) >> 4) & 0xF;
>>> + if (status == 0) {
>>> + engines_to_restart[num_failed_engine] =
>> template_idx;
>>> + num_failed_engine++;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + int numQqsAcc = conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
>>> + int numQgs = conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
>> qg_idx++)
>>> + payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
>>> + /* Force each engine which is in unspecified state */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_failed_engine; i++) {
>>> + int failed_engine = engines_to_restart[i];
>>> + printf("Force engine %d\n", failed_engine);
>>> + for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <=
>> SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
>>> + + BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
>>> + if (template_idx == failed_engine)
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + else
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, 0);
>>> + }
>>> + /* Reset descriptor header */
>>> + desc->req.word0 = ACC100_DMA_DESC_TYPE;
>>> + desc->req.word1 = 0;
>>> + desc->req.word2 = 0;
>>> + desc->req.word3 = 0;
>>> + desc->req.numCBs = 1;
>>> + desc->req.m2dlen = 2;
>>> + desc->req.d2mlen = 1;
>>> + /* Enqueue the code block for processing */
>>> + union acc100_enqueue_reg_fmt enq_req;
>>> + enq_req.val = 0;
>>> + enq_req.addr_offset = ACC100_DESC_OFFSET;
>>> + enq_req.num_elem = 1;
>>> + enq_req.req_elem_addr = 0;
>>> + rte_wmb();
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfQmgrIngressAq + 0x100,
>> enq_req.val);
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT * 100);
>>> + if (desc->req.word0 != 2)
>>> + printf("DMA Response %#"PRIx32"\n", desc-
>>> req.word0);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Reset LDPC Cores */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
>>> + ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
>> ACC100_RESET_HI);
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ACC100_ENGINES_MAX; i++)
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfFecUl5gCntrlReg +
>>> + ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * i,
>> ACC100_RESET_LO);
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT);
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfHi5GHardResetReg,
>> ACC100_RESET_HARD);
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT);
>>> + int numEngines = 0;
>>> + /* Check engine power-on status again */
>>> + for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + address = HwPfFecUl5gIbDebugReg +
>>> + ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * template_idx;
>>> + status = (acc100_reg_read(d, address) >> 4) & 0xF;
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
>>> + + BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
>>> + if (status == 1) {
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + numEngines++;
>>> + } else
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, 0);
>>> + }
>>> + printf("Number of 5GUL engines %d\n", numEngines);
>>> +
>>> + if (d->sw_rings_base != NULL)
>>> + rte_free(d->sw_rings_base);
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Initial configuration of a ACC100 device prior to running
>>> +configure() */ int acc100_configure(const char *dev_name, struct
>>> +acc100_conf *conf) {
>>> + rte_bbdev_log(INFO, "acc100_configure");
>>> + uint32_t payload, address, status;
>> maybe value or data would be a better variable name than payload.
>>
>> would mean changing acc100_reg_write
> transparent to me, but can change given DPDK uses term value.
>
>
>>> + int qg_idx, template_idx, vf_idx, acc, i;
>>> + struct rte_bbdev *bbdev = rte_bbdev_get_named_dev(dev_name);
>>> +
>>> + /* Compile time checks */
>>> + RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acc100_dma_req_desc) != 256);
>>> + RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(union acc100_dma_desc) != 256);
>>> + RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acc100_fcw_td) != 24);
>>> + RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct acc100_fcw_te) != 32);
>>> +
>>> + if (bbdev == NULL) {
>>> + rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
>>> + "Invalid dev_name (%s), or device is not yet initialised",
>>> + dev_name);
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + }
>>> + struct acc100_device *d = bbdev->data->dev_private;
>>> +
>>> + /* Store configuration */
>>> + rte_memcpy(&d->acc100_conf, conf, sizeof(d->acc100_conf));
>>> +
>>> + /* PCIe Bridge configuration */
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HwPfPcieGpexBridgeControl,
>> ACC100_CFG_PCI_BRIDGE);
>>> + for (i = 1; i < 17; i++)
>> 17 is a magic number, use a #define
>>
>> this is a general issue.
> These are only used once but still agreed.
>
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d,
>>> +
>> HwPfPcieGpexAxiAddrMappingWindowPexBaseHigh
>>> + + i * 16, 0);
>>> +
>>> + /* PCIe Link Trainiing and Status State Machine */
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HwPfPcieGpexLtssmStateCntrl, 0xDFC00000);
>>> +
>>> + /* Prevent blocking AXI read on BRESP for AXI Write */
>>> + address = HwPfPcieGpexAxiPioControl;
>>> + payload = ACC100_CFG_PCI_AXI;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* 5GDL PLL phase shift */
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, HWPfChaDl5gPllPhshft0, 0x1);
>>> +
>>> + /* Explicitly releasing AXI as this may be stopped after PF FLR/BME */
>>> + address = HWPfDmaAxiControl;
>>> + payload = 1;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* DDR Configuration */
>>> + address = HWPfDdrBcTim6;
>>> + payload = acc100_reg_read(d, address);
>>> + payload &= 0xFFFFFFFB; /* Bit 2 */ #ifdef ACC100_DDR_ECC_ENABLE
>>> + payload |= 0x4;
>>> +#endif
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + address = HWPfDdrPhyDqsCountNum;
>>> +#ifdef ACC100_DDR_ECC_ENABLE
>>> + payload = 9;
>>> +#else
>>> + payload = 8;
>>> +#endif
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* Set default descriptor signature */
>>> + address = HWPfDmaDescriptorSignatuture;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* Enable the Error Detection in DMA */
>>> + payload = ACC100_CFG_DMA_ERROR;
>>> + address = HWPfDmaErrorDetectionEn;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* AXI Cache configuration */
>>> + payload = ACC100_CFG_AXI_CACHE;
>>> + address = HWPfDmaAxcacheReg;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* Default DMA Configuration (Qmgr Enabled) */
>>> + address = HWPfDmaConfig0Reg;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + address = HWPfDmaQmanen;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* Default RLIM/ALEN configuration */
>>> + address = HWPfDmaConfig1Reg;
>>> + payload = (1 << 31) + (23 << 8) + (1 << 6) + 7;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* Configure DMA Qmanager addresses */
>>> + address = HWPfDmaQmgrAddrReg;
>>> + payload = HWPfQmgrEgressQueuesTemplate;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* ===== Qmgr Configuration ===== */
>>> + /* Configuration of the AQueue Depth QMGR_GRP_0_DEPTH_LOG2
>> for UL */
>>> + int totalQgs = conf->q_ul_4g.num_qgroups +
>>> + conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups +
>>> + conf->q_dl_4g.num_qgroups +
>>> + conf->q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
>>> + for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < totalQgs; qg_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrDepthLog2Grp +
>>> + BYTES_IN_WORD * qg_idx;
>>> + payload = aqDepth(qg_idx, conf);
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrTholdGrp +
>>> + BYTES_IN_WORD * qg_idx;
>>> + payload = (1 << 16) + (1 << (aqDepth(qg_idx, conf) - 1));
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Template Priority in incremental order */
>>> + for (template_idx = 0; template_idx < ACC100_NUM_TMPL;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg0Indx +
>>> + BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
>>> + payload = TMPL_PRI_0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg1Indx +
>>> + BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
>>> + payload = TMPL_PRI_1;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg2indx +
>>> + BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
>>> + payload = TMPL_PRI_2;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg3Indx +
>>> + BYTES_IN_WORD * (template_idx % 8);
>>> + payload = TMPL_PRI_3;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpPriority;
>>> + payload = ACC100_CFG_QMGR_HI_P;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* Template Configuration */
>>> + for (template_idx = 0; template_idx < ACC100_NUM_TMPL;
>> template_idx++) {
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
>>> + + BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + }
>>> + /* 4GUL */
>>> + int numQgs = conf->q_ul_4g.num_qgroups;
>>> + int numQqsAcc = 0;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
>> qg_idx++)
>>> + payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
>>> + for (template_idx = SIG_UL_4G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_4G_LAST;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
>>> + + BYTES_IN_WORD*template_idx;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + }
>>> + /* 5GUL */
>>> + numQqsAcc += numQgs;
>>> + numQgs = conf->q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + int numEngines = 0;
>>> + for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
>> qg_idx++)
>>> + payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
>>> + for (template_idx = SIG_UL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_UL_5G_LAST;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + /* Check engine power-on status */
>>> + address = HwPfFecUl5gIbDebugReg +
>>> + ACC100_ENGINE_OFFSET * template_idx;
>>> + status = (acc100_reg_read(d, address) >> 4) & 0xF;
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
>>> + + BYTES_IN_WORD * template_idx;
>>> + if (status == 1) {
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + numEngines++;
>>> + } else
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, 0);
>>> + #if RTE_ACC100_SINGLE_FEC == 1
>> #if should be at start of line
> ok
>
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + #endif
>>> + }
>>> + printf("Number of 5GUL engines %d\n", numEngines);
>>> + /* 4GDL */
>>> + numQqsAcc += numQgs;
>>> + numQgs = conf->q_dl_4g.num_qgroups;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
>> qg_idx++)
>>> + payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
>>> + for (template_idx = SIG_DL_4G; template_idx <= SIG_DL_4G_LAST;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
>>> + + BYTES_IN_WORD*template_idx;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + #if RTE_ACC100_SINGLE_FEC == 1
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + #endif
>>> + }
>>> + /* 5GDL */
>>> + numQqsAcc += numQgs;
>>> + numQgs = conf->q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + for (qg_idx = numQqsAcc; qg_idx < (numQgs + numQqsAcc);
>> qg_idx++)
>>> + payload |= (1 << qg_idx);
>>> + for (template_idx = SIG_DL_5G; template_idx <= SIG_DL_5G_LAST;
>>> + template_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpTmplateReg4Indx
>>> + + BYTES_IN_WORD*template_idx;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + #if RTE_ACC100_SINGLE_FEC == 1
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + #endif
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Queue Group Function mapping */
>>> + int qman_func_id[5] = {0, 2, 1, 3, 4};
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrGrpFunction0;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < 8; qg_idx++) {
>>> + acc = accFromQgid(qg_idx, conf);
>>> + payload |= qman_func_id[acc]<<(qg_idx * 4);
>>> + }
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* Configuration of the Arbitration QGroup depth to 1 */
>>> + for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < totalQgs; qg_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrArbQDepthGrp +
>>> + BYTES_IN_WORD * qg_idx;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Enabling AQueues through the Queue hierarchy*/
>>> + for (vf_idx = 0; vf_idx < ACC100_NUM_VFS; vf_idx++) {
>>> + for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < ACC100_NUM_QGRPS; qg_idx++) {
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + if (vf_idx < conf->num_vf_bundles &&
>>> + qg_idx < totalQgs)
>>> + payload = (1 << aqNum(qg_idx, conf)) - 1;
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrAqEnableVf
>>> + + vf_idx * BYTES_IN_WORD;
>>> + payload += (qg_idx << 16);
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* This pointer to ARAM (256kB) is shifted by 2 (4B per register) */
>>> + uint32_t aram_address = 0;
>>> + for (qg_idx = 0; qg_idx < totalQgs; qg_idx++) {
>>> + for (vf_idx = 0; vf_idx < conf->num_vf_bundles; vf_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfQmgrVfBaseAddr + vf_idx
>>> + * BYTES_IN_WORD + qg_idx
>>> + * BYTES_IN_WORD * 64;
>>> + payload = aram_address;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + /* Offset ARAM Address for next memory bank
>>> + * - increment of 4B
>>> + */
>>> + aram_address += aqNum(qg_idx, conf) *
>>> + (1 << aqDepth(qg_idx, conf));
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (aram_address > WORDS_IN_ARAM_SIZE) {
>>> + rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "ARAM Configuration not fitting %d
>> %d\n",
>>> + aram_address, WORDS_IN_ARAM_SIZE);
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* ==== HI Configuration ==== */
>>> +
>>> + /* Prevent Block on Transmit Error */
>>> + address = HWPfHiBlockTransmitOnErrorEn;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + /* Prevents to drop MSI */
>>> + address = HWPfHiMsiDropEnableReg;
>>> + payload = 0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + /* Set the PF Mode register */
>>> + address = HWPfHiPfMode;
>>> + payload = (conf->pf_mode_en) ? 2 : 0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + /* Enable Error Detection in HW */
>>> + address = HWPfDmaErrorDetectionEn;
>>> + payload = 0x3D7;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* QoS overflow init */
>>> + payload = 1;
>>> + address = HWPfQosmonAEvalOverflow0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + address = HWPfQosmonBEvalOverflow0;
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> +
>>> + /* HARQ DDR Configuration */
>>> + unsigned int ddrSizeInMb = 512; /* Fixed to 512 MB per VF for now
>> */
>>> + for (vf_idx = 0; vf_idx < conf->num_vf_bundles; vf_idx++) {
>>> + address = HWPfDmaVfDdrBaseRw + vf_idx
>>> + * 0x10;
>>> + payload = ((vf_idx * (ddrSizeInMb / 64)) << 16) +
>>> + (ddrSizeInMb - 1);
>>> + acc100_reg_write(d, address, payload);
>>> + }
>>> + usleep(LONG_WAIT);
>> Is sleep needed here ? the reg_write has one.
> This one is needed on top
>
>>> +
>> Since this seems like a workaround, add a comment here.
> fair enough, ok, thanks
>
>> Tom
>>
>>> + if (numEngines < (SIG_UL_5G_LAST + 1))
>>> + poweron_cleanup(bbdev, d, conf);
>>> +
>>> + rte_bbdev_log_debug("PF Tip configuration complete for %s",
>> dev_name);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git
>>> a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
>>> index 4a76d1d..91c234d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_pmd_bbdev_acc100_version.map
>>> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
>>> DPDK_21 {
>>> local: *;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> +EXPERIMENTAL {
>>> + global:
>>> +
>>> + acc100_configure;
>>> +
>>> +};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-19 0:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-29 9:44 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-04 16:44 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-29 9:55 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-29 17:39 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03 2:15 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-03 9:17 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-29 10:39 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-29 17:48 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03 2:30 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-03 22:48 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-04 2:01 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-20 14:38 ` Dave Burley
2020-08-20 14:52 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-08-20 14:57 ` Dave Burley
2020-08-20 21:05 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03 8:06 ` Dave Burley
2020-08-29 11:10 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-08-29 18:01 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-03 2:34 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-03 9:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-03 20:45 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-15 1:45 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-15 10:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-03 10:06 ` Aidan Goddard
2020-09-03 18:53 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-08-19 0:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-04 17:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-04 17:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-08 3:10 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15 2:31 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-18 2:39 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-18 2:47 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15 2:31 ` Xu, Rosen
2020-09-18 3:01 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21 1:40 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21 1:41 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21 1:43 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21 1:45 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21 1:46 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21 1:48 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-04 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-21 1:50 ` Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-21 14:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-22 19:32 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-23 2:21 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/11] service: retrieve lcore active state Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/11] test/service: fix race condition on stopping lcore Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 01/11] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/11] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 03/11] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 04/11] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 05/11] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 06/11] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 07/11] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 08/11] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 09/11] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 10/11] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-23 2:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 11/11] doc: update bbdev feature table Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 20:19 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-29 0:57 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-28 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 19:53 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 23:17 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:06 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 23:30 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 20:34 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 23:30 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:11 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 21:13 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 0:25 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:20 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-29 21:46 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 1:03 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-30 23:36 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 16:53 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 18:52 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:31 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-01 16:07 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 17:25 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 18:55 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:32 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 18:37 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 19:10 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:42 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-01 21:46 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 19:03 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 19:45 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 16:05 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-01 21:07 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 19:16 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 19:53 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 16:07 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-29 0:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-30 19:58 ` Tom Rix
2020-09-30 22:54 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 16:18 ` Tom Rix [this message]
2020-10-01 21:11 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 14:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 19:50 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 15:38 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 19:50 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 3:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-01 14:11 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 15:36 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 15:43 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 19:50 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 21:44 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 15:53 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 15:56 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 16:09 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-05 16:38 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-05 22:19 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-04 16:18 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-05 16:42 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-02 1:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 01/10] drivers/baseband: add PMD for ACC100 Nicolas Chautru
2020-11-02 9:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-02 11:16 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 02/10] baseband/acc100: add register definition file Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 03/10] baseband/acc100: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 04/10] baseband/acc100: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 05/10] baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 06/10] baseband/acc100: add HARQ loopback support Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 07/10] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G processing Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 08/10] baseband/acc100: add interrupt support to PMD Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 09/10] baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-05 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 10/10] baseband/acc100: add configure function Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-06 13:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] bbdev PMD ACC100 Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-06 19:43 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d31a887-6a52-d885-8b50-486d573f5975@redhat.com \
--to=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dave.burley@accelercomm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=rosen.xu@intel.com \
--cc=tianjiao.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).