DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
	Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
	Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Cc: anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:53:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f1dcd1e-6c15-fb6e-e4b6-fb7a0383cd54@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8467f1cab647d72d9e52fe03faffd408761e66d9.1513264386.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>

Hi Nelio,


On 12/14/2017 08:44 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> Mellanox INNOVA NIC needs to have final target queue actions to perform
> inline crypto.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
>
>   * remove Egress code.
>
> Changes in v3:
>
>   * removed PASSTHRU test for ingress.
>   * removed check on configured queues for the queue action.
>
> Changes in v2:
>
>   * Test the rule by PASSTHRU/RSS/QUEUE and apply the first one validated.
> ---
>   examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h |  2 +-
>   2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> index 17bd7620d..8e8dc6df7 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ create_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa)
>   							rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx(
>   							sa->portid);
>   			const struct rte_security_capability *sec_cap;
> +			int ret = 0;
>   
>   			sa->sec_session = rte_security_session_create(ctx,
>   					&sess_conf, ipsec_ctx->session_pool);
> @@ -201,15 +202,63 @@ create_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa)
>   			sa->action[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SECURITY;
>   			sa->action[0].conf = sa->sec_session;
>   
> -			sa->action[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END;
This is reverted in the second patch, right? Are you planning to revise 
the patch fixing this? I'm fine with the changes, otherwise.
> -
>   			sa->attr.egress = (sa->direction ==
>   					RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS);
>   			sa->attr.ingress = (sa->direction ==
>   					RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS);
> +			if (sa->attr.ingress) {
> +				uint8_t rss_key[40];
> +				struct rte_eth_rss_conf rss_conf = {
> +					.rss_key = rss_key,
> +					.rss_key_len = 40,
> +				};
> +				struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
> +				union {
> +					struct rte_flow_action_rss rss;
> +					struct {
> +					const struct rte_eth_rss_conf *rss_conf;
> +					uint16_t num;
> +					uint16_t queue[RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT];
> +					} local;
> +				} action_rss;
> +				unsigned int i;
> +				unsigned int j;
> +
> +				sa->action[2].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END;
> +				/* Try RSS. */
> +				sa->action[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_RSS;
> +				sa->action[1].conf = &action_rss;
> +				eth_dev = ctx->device;
> +				rte_eth_dev_rss_hash_conf_get(sa->portid,
> +							      &rss_conf);
> +				for (i = 0, j = 0;
> +				     i < eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; ++i)
> +					if (eth_dev->data->rx_queues[i])
> +						action_rss.local.queue[j++] = i;
> +				action_rss.local.num = j;
> +				action_rss.local.rss_conf = &rss_conf;
> +				ret = rte_flow_validate(sa->portid, &sa->attr,
> +							sa->pattern, sa->action,
> +							&err);
> +				if (!ret)
> +					goto flow_create;
> +				/* Try Queue. */
> +				sa->action[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE;
> +				sa->action[1].conf =
> +					&(struct rte_flow_action_queue){
> +					.index = 0,
> +				};
> +				ret = rte_flow_validate(sa->portid, &sa->attr,
> +							sa->pattern, sa->action,
> +							&err);
> +				if (ret)
> +					goto flow_create_failure;
> +			}
> +flow_create:
>   			sa->flow = rte_flow_create(sa->portid,
>   				&sa->attr, sa->pattern, sa->action, &err);
>   			if (sa->flow == NULL) {
> +flow_create_failure:
>   				RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC,
>   					"Failed to create ipsec flow msg: %s\n",
>   					err.message);
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> index 775b316ff..3c367d392 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.h
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct ipsec_sa {
>   	uint32_t ol_flags;
>   
>   #define MAX_RTE_FLOW_PATTERN (4)
> -#define MAX_RTE_FLOW_ACTIONS (2)
> +#define MAX_RTE_FLOW_ACTIONS (3)
>   	struct rte_flow_item pattern[MAX_RTE_FLOW_PATTERN];
>   	struct rte_flow_action action[MAX_RTE_FLOW_ACTIONS];
>   	struct rte_flow_attr attr;

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-23 15:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-23 15:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-29 12:30   ` Anoob
2017-11-29 12:50     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-30 10:46       ` Anoob
2017-11-30 12:28         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-01 15:04           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-01 16:26             ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-04 14:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-11 11:50     ` Radu Nicolau
2017-12-04 14:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-07  9:47     ` Anoob
2017-12-07 12:22       ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-08 14:00     ` Anoob
2017-12-08 14:40       ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-08 16:40         ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-11  8:21           ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-11  9:00             ` Anoob
2017-12-11 14:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12  7:14       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-11 14:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12 12:43       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 13:44         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12 14:04           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 14:38             ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13  6:41               ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 10:02                 ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13 11:38                   ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 12:53                     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13 13:53                       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 14:47                         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-20 16:19                           ` Boris Pismenny
2017-12-21  8:06                             ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-21 10:12                               ` Boris Pismenny
2017-12-21 14:22                                 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-05  6:18                                   ` Anoob Joseph
2018-01-09 12:48                                     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-10  6:21                                       ` Anoob Joseph
2018-01-05  5:52                                 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-18  8:23         ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2017-12-18  9:57           ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress " Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15  9:05         ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-15 13:53           ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15 15:39             ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-15 16:53               ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15 17:01                 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-18 14:50           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-19  6:22           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress " Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-08 16:13           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-01-16 16:12           ` Nicolau, Radu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0f1dcd1e-6c15-fb6e-e4b6-fb7a0383cd54@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).