DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	'Tiwei Bie' <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yliu@fridaylinux.org, jfreiman@redhat.com,
	mst@redhat.com, vkaplans@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	lei.a.yao@intel.com, cunming.liang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/21] vhost: protect virtio_net device struct
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:50:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13099d85-44d9-c3b9-7db1-20b6ff2b53d9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000e01d326bc$27fdfbe0$77f9f3a0$@networkplumber.org>

Hi Stephen,

On 09/06/2017 04:59 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>> This lock has currently two purposes:
>>>> 1. Prevent referencing freed virtio_dev struct in case of numa_realloc.
>>>> 2. Protect vring pages against invalidation.
>>>>
>>>> For 2., it can be fixed by using the per-vq IOTLB lock (it was not the
>>>> case in my early prototypes that had per device IOTLB cache).
>>>>
>>>> For 1., this is an existing problem, so we might consider it is
>>>> acceptable to keep current state. Maybe it could be improved by only
>>>> reallocating in case VQ0 is not on the right NUMA node, the other VQs
>>>> not being initialized at this point.
> 
> Something like RCU does a better job of protecting against freed virtio_dev.
> But using RCU requires quiescent callback in the main loop.

In my early prototypes, I used the urcu library for the IOTLB cache
implementation.

The problems are that:
1. The lib is LGPL, so only small functions can be inlined into the
code (maybe not a important, if "large functions" are only called in the
slow path).
2. It adds an external dependency, and the lib is not distributed with
every distributions (For RHEL, it is only distributed in EPEL repos).

For the virtio_dev protection, my understanding might be incorrect as
this is the first time I used RCU, but the struct has one field
that the processing threads can write (broadcast_rarp).
But it may not be a problem because at worst, only broadcast_rarp
clearing would be lost, so we would broadcast RARP one more time.

Maxime

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-06  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-31  9:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/21] Vhost-user: Implement device IOTLB support Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/21] Revert "vhost: workaround MQ fails to startup" Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-07 11:54   ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-07 12:59     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-24 10:41       ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] vhost: make error handling consistent in rx path Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/21] vhost: protect virtio_net device struct Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05  4:45   ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05  9:24     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05 10:07       ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 11:00         ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-06  1:15           ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-06  2:59             ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-09-06  7:50               ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2017-09-06  7:15             ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-06  7:30               ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-06 20:02                 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-07  5:08                   ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-07 13:44   ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-07 14:01     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/21] vhost: prepare send_vhost_message() to slave requests Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/21] vhost: add support to slave requests channel Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05  4:19   ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05  8:18     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/21] vhost: declare missing IOMMU-related definitions for old kernels Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/21] vhost: add iotlb helper functions Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05  6:02   ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 15:16     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-08  8:08   ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-08  8:24     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-08  8:36       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-08  8:50         ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-08  9:21           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-08  9:28             ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/21] vhost: iotlb: add pending miss request list and helpers Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05  7:11   ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 15:18     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/21] vhost-user: add support to IOTLB miss slave requests Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/21] vhost: initialize vrings IOTLB caches Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-04 13:57   ` Remy Horton
2017-09-04 15:45     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/21] vhost-user: handle IOTLB update and invalidate requests Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/21] vhost: introduce guest IOVA to backend VA helper Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05  4:14   ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05  7:05     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/21] vhost: use the guest IOVA to host " Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/21] vhost: enable rings at the right time Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 15/21] vhost: don't dereference invalid dev pointer after its reallocation Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-04 13:58   ` Remy Horton
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 16/21] vhost: postpone rings addresses translation Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 17/21] vhost-user: translate ring addresses when IOMMU enabled Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 18/21] vhost-user: iommu: postpone device creation until ring are mapped Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 19/21] vhost: iommu: Invalidate vring in case of matching IOTLB invalidate Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 20/21] vhost: enable IOMMU support Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31  9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21/21] vhost: iotlb: reduce iotlb read lock usage Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-11  4:18   ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-11  7:34     ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-11  9:39       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-04 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/21] Vhost-user: Implement device IOTLB support Remy Horton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13099d85-44d9-c3b9-7db1-20b6ff2b53d9@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jfreiman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lei.a.yao@intel.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=vkaplans@redhat.com \
    --cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).