DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Wang Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 15/16] fm10k: fix iov_msg_lport_state_pf re-enable bug
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:42:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437986559-31016-15-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437986559-31016-1-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com>

When a VF issues an LPORT_STATE request to enable a port which is
already enabled, the PF will first disable the VF. Then it is supposed
to re-enable the VF again with new settings. This is primarily done in
order to ensure that the switch management software properly clears the
previous VF settings. (ie: switch flow rules and so forth). However,
there is a bug in the flow because we check if VF is enabled and don't
re-enable it at the end. The issue is that we disable the VF in order to
clear switch rules, and never follow-up with a re-enable. This results in
a call to enable the VF results in disabling the logical port.

Signed-off-by: Wang Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_pf.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_pf.c b/drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_pf.c
index 86283fa..aa04937 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_pf.c
@@ -1418,6 +1418,14 @@ s32 fm10k_iov_msg_lport_state_pf(struct fm10k_hw *hw, u32 **results,
 			err = fm10k_update_lport_state_pf(hw, vf_info->glort,
 							  1, false);
 
+		/* need to clear VF_FLAG_ENABLED in order to ensure that we
+		 * actually re-enable the lport state below. Note that this
+		 * has no impact if VF is already disabled, as the flags are
+		 * already zeroed.
+		 */
+		if (!err)
+			vf_info->vf_flags = FM10K_VF_FLAG_CAPABLE(vf_info);
+
 		/* when enabling the port we should reset the rate limiters */
 		hw->iov.ops.configure_tc(hw, vf_info->vf_idx, vf_info->rate);
 
-- 
1.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-27  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-27  8:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/16] fm10k: add PF Tx Timestamp mode handler function Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/16] fm10k: add no-op pointer for VF request_tx_timestamp_mode Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] fm10k: Set PF queues to unlimited bandwidth Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/16] fm10k: fix fm10k_mbx_write_copy header comment Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/16] fm10k: Add support for ITR scaling based on PCIe link speed Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/16] fm10k: reset head instead of calling update_max_size Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/16] fm10k: mbx_update_max_size does not drop all Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/16] fm10k: ensure VF restores itr_scale on stop_hw Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/16] fm10k: ensure itr_scale is set even if we don't know speed Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/16] fm10k: correct VF multicast update Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/16] fm10k: Re-map all possible VF queues after a VFLR Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/16] fm10k: pack TLV overlay structures correctly Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/16] fm10k: 1558 DIR_NEGATIVE bit is actually DIR_POSITIVE Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/16] fm10k: remove err_no reference Wang Xiao W
2015-07-27  8:42 ` Wang Xiao W [this message]
2015-07-27  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 16/16] fm10k: add macro definitions about valid ether addr Wang Xiao W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1437986559-31016-15-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    --to=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).