DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy
Date: Tue,  5 Apr 2016 13:53:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459857229-9814-5-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459857229-9814-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>

The previous code in func_reentrancy autotest was doing in parallel
something close to:

  name = "common_name";
  do several times {
      obj = allocate_an_object(name)   // obj = ring, mempool, hash, lpm, ...
      if (obj == NULL && lookup(name) == NULL)
          return TEST_FAIL;
  }

This code is not safe. For instance:

   mempool_create() is called on core 0, it creates a ring. At the same
   time on core 1, mempool_create() is called too and the creation of the
   ring fails (EEXIST). But the mempool lookup can fail on core 1 if
   the mempool is not added in the list by core 0.

This commit fixes the func_reentrancy autotest that now works with all
tested class of objects.

Fixes: 104a92bd02 ("app: add reentrancy tests")
Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---
 app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
index 5d09296..300a3bc 100644
--- a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
+++ b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ typedef void (*case_clean_t)(unsigned lcore_id);
 
 #define MAX_LCORES	RTE_MAX_MEMZONE / (MAX_ITER_TIMES * 4U)
 
+static rte_atomic32_t obj_count = RTE_ATOMIC32_INIT(0);
 static rte_atomic32_t synchro = RTE_ATOMIC32_INIT(0);
 
 #define WAIT_SYNCHRO_FOR_SLAVES()   do{ \
@@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ test_eal_init_once(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
 
 	WAIT_SYNCHRO_FOR_SLAVES();
 
+	rte_atomic32_set(&obj_count, 1); /* silent the check in the caller */
 	if (rte_eal_init(0, NULL) != -1)
 		return -1;
 
@@ -122,8 +124,8 @@ ring_create_lookup(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
 	/* create the same ring simultaneously on all threads */
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_TIMES; i++) {
 		rp = rte_ring_create("fr_test_once", 4096, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
-		if ((NULL == rp) && (rte_ring_lookup("fr_test_once") == NULL))
-			return -1;
+		if (rp != NULL)
+			rte_atomic32_inc(&obj_count);
 	}
 
 	/* create/lookup new ring several times */
@@ -172,8 +174,8 @@ mempool_create_lookup(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
 					NULL, NULL,
 					my_obj_init, NULL,
 					SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
-		if ((NULL == mp) && (rte_mempool_lookup("fr_test_once") == NULL))
-			return -1;
+		if (mp != NULL)
+			rte_atomic32_inc(&obj_count);
 	}
 
 	/* create/lookup new ring several times */
@@ -238,8 +240,8 @@ hash_create_free(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
 	hash_params.name = "fr_test_once";
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_TIMES; i++) {
 		handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
-		if ((NULL == handle) && (rte_hash_find_existing("fr_test_once") == NULL))
-			return -1;
+		if (handle != NULL)
+			rte_atomic32_inc(&obj_count);
 	}
 
 	/* create mutiple times simultaneously */
@@ -306,8 +308,8 @@ fbk_create_free(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
 	fbk_params.name = "fr_test_once";
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_TIMES; i++) {
 		handle = rte_fbk_hash_create(&fbk_params);
-		if ((NULL == handle) && (rte_fbk_hash_find_existing("fr_test_once") == NULL))
-			return -1;
+		if (handle != NULL)
+			rte_atomic32_inc(&obj_count);
 	}
 
 	/* create mutiple fbk tables simultaneously */
@@ -372,8 +374,8 @@ lpm_create_free(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
 	/* create the same lpm simultaneously on all threads */
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_TIMES; i++) {
 		lpm = rte_lpm_create("fr_test_once",  SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
-		if ((NULL == lpm) && (rte_lpm_find_existing("fr_test_once") == NULL))
-			return -1;
+		if (lpm != NULL)
+			rte_atomic32_inc(&obj_count);
 	}
 
 	/* create mutiple fbk tables simultaneously */
@@ -432,10 +434,12 @@ launch_test(struct test_case *pt_case)
 	unsigned lcore_id;
 	unsigned cores_save = rte_lcore_count();
 	unsigned cores = RTE_MIN(cores_save, MAX_LCORES);
+	unsigned count;
 
 	if (pt_case->func == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
+	rte_atomic32_set(&obj_count, 0);
 	rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 0);
 
 	RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(lcore_id) {
@@ -462,6 +466,13 @@ launch_test(struct test_case *pt_case)
 			pt_case->clean(lcore_id);
 	}
 
+	count = rte_atomic32_read(&obj_count);
+	if (count != 1) {
+		printf("%s: common object allocated %d times (should be 1)\n",
+			pt_case->name, count);
+		ret = -1;
+	}
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-05 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-15 12:25 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] hash/lpm: return NULL if the object exists Olivier Matz
2016-03-25 10:32 ` Olivier Matz
2016-03-25 10:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-30 15:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] fix lpm and hash creation Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 21:46     ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-31  7:35       ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-01 16:25         ` Olivier Matz
2016-03-31 10:55       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-03-31  7:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] fix lpm and hash creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:05       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:00       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-05 11:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-04-05 15:51       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-06 10:11         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 10:32       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 11:14         ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 11:20           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 11:57             ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:28         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:28         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 15:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459857229-9814-5-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).