DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com, Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] app/test: add new buffer comparison macros
Date: Fri,  6 May 2016 14:58:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462543128-26604-3-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462543128-26604-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>

In order to compare buffers with length and offset in bits,
new macros have been created, which use the previous compare function
to compare full bytes and then, compare first and last bytes of
each buffer separately.

Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test.h b/app/test/test.h
index a2fba60..e87760e 100644
--- a/app/test/test.h
+++ b/app/test/test.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 		}                                                        \
 } while (0)
 
-
+/* Compare two buffers (length in bytes) */
 #define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(a, b, len,  msg, ...) do {	\
 	if (memcmp(a, b, len)) {                                        \
 		printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: "              \
@@ -74,6 +74,61 @@
 	}                                                        \
 } while (0)
 
+/* Compare two buffers with offset (length and offset in bytes) */
+#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_OFFSET(a, b, len, off, msg, ...) do { \
+	const uint8_t *_a_with_off = (const uint8_t *)a + off;              \
+	const uint8_t *_b_with_off = (const uint8_t *)b + off;              \
+	TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(_a_with_off, _b_with_off, len, msg);  \
+} while (0)
+
+/* Compare two buffers (length in bits) */
+#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_BIT(a, b, len, msg, ...) do {	\
+	uint8_t _last_byte_a, _last_byte_b;                       \
+	uint8_t _last_byte_mask, _last_byte_bits;                  \
+	TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(a, b, (len >> 3), msg);     \
+	if (len % 8) {                                              \
+		_last_byte_bits = len % 8;                   \
+		_last_byte_mask = ~((1 << (8 - _last_byte_bits)) - 1); \
+		_last_byte_a = ((const uint8_t *)a)[len >> 3];            \
+		_last_byte_b = ((const uint8_t *)b)[len >> 3];            \
+		_last_byte_a &= _last_byte_mask;                     \
+		_last_byte_b &= _last_byte_mask;                    \
+		if (_last_byte_a != _last_byte_b) {                  \
+			printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: "              \
+				msg "\n", __func__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__);\
+			TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);    \
+			return TEST_FAILED;                                  \
+		}                                                        \
+	}                                                            \
+} while (0)
+
+/* Compare two buffers with offset (length and offset in bits) */
+#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_BIT_OFFSET(a, b, len, off, msg, ...) do {	\
+	uint8_t _first_byte_a, _first_byte_b;                                 \
+	uint8_t _first_byte_mask, _first_byte_bits;                           \
+	uint32_t _len_without_first_byte = (off % 8) ?                       \
+				len - (8 - (off % 8)) :                       \
+				len;                                          \
+	uint32_t _off_in_bytes = (off % 8) ? (off >> 3) + 1 : (off >> 3);     \
+	const uint8_t *_a_with_off = (const uint8_t *)a + _off_in_bytes;      \
+	const uint8_t *_b_with_off = (const uint8_t *)b + _off_in_bytes;      \
+	TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_BIT(_a_with_off, _b_with_off,           \
+				_len_without_first_byte, msg);                \
+	if (off % 8) {                                                        \
+		_first_byte_bits = 8 - (off % 8);                             \
+		_first_byte_mask = (1 << _first_byte_bits) - 1;               \
+		_first_byte_a = *(_a_with_off - 1);                           \
+		_first_byte_b = *(_b_with_off - 1);                           \
+		_first_byte_a &= _first_byte_mask;                            \
+		_first_byte_b &= _first_byte_mask;                            \
+		if (_first_byte_a != _first_byte_b) {                         \
+			printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: "               \
+				msg "\n", __func__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+			TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);     \
+			return TEST_FAILED;                                   \
+		}                                                             \
+	}                                                                     \
+} while (0)
 
 #define TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(a, b, msg, ...) do {               \
 		if (!(a != b)) {                                         \
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-06 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-06 13:58 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Add new KASUMI SW PMD Pablo de Lara
2016-05-06 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] kasumi: add new KASUMI PMD Pablo de Lara
2016-05-06 13:58 ` Pablo de Lara [this message]
2016-05-06 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] app/test: add unit tests for " Pablo de Lara
2016-05-06 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] l2fwd-crypto: add KASUMI algo support Pablo de Lara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1462543128-26604-3-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).