DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
	Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] bonding: add spinlock to rx and tx queues
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 18:11:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465751489-10111-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465751489-10111-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>

At present it is possible to add and remove slave devices from the
bonding device while traffic is running. This can result in
segmentation faults occurring in the rx and tx burst functions.
To resolve this issue spinlocks have been added to the rx and tx
queues.

Now when a slave is added or removed the rx and tx queue spinlocks
must be held.

Fixes: 2efb58cbab6e ("bond: new link bonding library")

Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c     | 4 ++++
 drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
index 129f04b..2e624bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
@@ -1676,6 +1676,8 @@ bond_ethdev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
 	if (bd_rx_q == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
+	rte_spinlock_init(&bd_rx_q->lock);
+
 	bd_rx_q->queue_id = rx_queue_id;
 	bd_rx_q->dev_private = dev->data->dev_private;
 
@@ -1701,6 +1703,8 @@ bond_ethdev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 	if (bd_tx_q == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
+	rte_spinlock_init(&bd_tx_q->lock);
+
 	bd_tx_q->queue_id = tx_queue_id;
 	bd_tx_q->dev_private = dev->data->dev_private;
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h
index 8312397..b6abcba 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*-
  *   BSD LICENSE
  *
- *   Copyright(c) 2010-2015 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ *   Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
  *   All rights reserved.
  *
  *   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct bond_rx_queue {
 	/**< Copy of RX configuration structure for queue */
 	struct rte_mempool *mb_pool;
 	/**< Reference to mbuf pool to use for RX queue */
+	rte_spinlock_t lock;
 };
 
 struct bond_tx_queue {
@@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ struct bond_tx_queue {
 	/**< Number of TX descriptors available for the queue */
 	struct rte_eth_txconf tx_conf;
 	/**< Copy of TX configuration structure for queue */
+	rte_spinlock_t lock;
 };
 
 /** Bonded slave devices structure */
-- 
2.6.3

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-12 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05 15:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] bonding: locks Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-05 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] bonding: replace spinlock with read/write lock Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-05 17:12   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-05-06 10:32     ` Declan Doherty
2016-05-06 15:55       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-05-13 17:10         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-13 17:18           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-26 16:24             ` Iremonger, Bernard
2016-05-05 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] bonding: add read/write lock to rx/tx burst functions Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-05 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] bonding: remove memcopy of slaves from rx/tx burst function Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-05 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] bonding: add read/write lock to stop function Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-05 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] bonding: add read/write lock to the link_update function Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-26 16:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] bonding: locks Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-26 16:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] bonding: add spinlock to rx and tx queues Bernard Iremonger
2016-06-10 18:12     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-12 17:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] bonding: locks Bernard Iremonger
2016-06-12 17:11       ` Bernard Iremonger [this message]
2016-06-12 17:11       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] bonding: grab queue spinlocks in slave add and remove Bernard Iremonger
2016-06-12 17:11       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] bonding: take queue spinlock in rx/tx burst functions Bernard Iremonger
2016-06-13  9:18         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 12:28           ` Iremonger, Bernard
2016-06-16 14:32             ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-16 15:00               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-16 16:41                 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2016-06-16 18:38                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-15 18:01                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-16  9:13                       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-02-16 11:39                         ` Iremonger, Bernard
2017-02-20 11:15                           ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-09-09 11:29         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-06-12 17:11       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] bonding: remove memcpy from " Bernard Iremonger
2016-09-11 12:39         ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-26 16:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] bonding: grab queue spinlocks in slave add and remove Bernard Iremonger
2016-06-10 18:14     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-26 16:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] bonding: take queue spinlock in rx/tx burst functions Bernard Iremonger
2016-06-10 18:14     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-26 16:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] bonding: add spinlock to stop function Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-26 16:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] bonding: add spinlock to link update function Bernard Iremonger
2016-05-26 16:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] bonding: remove memcpy from burst functions Bernard Iremonger
2016-06-10 18:15     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-10 14:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] bonding: locks Bruce Richardson
2016-06-10 18:24     ` Iremonger, Bernard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1465751489-10111-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --to=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).