From: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com, Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] test: add new buffer comparison macros
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:32:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466159565-27950-3-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466159565-27950-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
In order to compare buffers with length and offset in bits,
new macros have been created, which use the previous compare function
to compare full bytes and then, compare first and last bytes of
each buffer separately.
Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
---
app/test/test.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test.h b/app/test/test.h
index 8ddde23..81828be 100644
--- a/app/test/test.h
+++ b/app/test/test.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
} \
} while (0)
-
+/* Compare two buffers (length in bytes) */
#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(a, b, len, msg, ...) do { \
if (memcmp(a, b, len)) { \
printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: " \
@@ -75,6 +75,61 @@
} \
} while (0)
+/* Compare two buffers with offset (length and offset in bytes) */
+#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_OFFSET(a, b, len, off, msg, ...) do { \
+ const uint8_t *_a_with_off = (const uint8_t *)a + off; \
+ const uint8_t *_b_with_off = (const uint8_t *)b + off; \
+ TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(_a_with_off, _b_with_off, len, msg); \
+} while (0)
+
+/* Compare two buffers (length in bits) */
+#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_BIT(a, b, len, msg, ...) do { \
+ uint8_t _last_byte_a, _last_byte_b; \
+ uint8_t _last_byte_mask, _last_byte_bits; \
+ TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(a, b, (len >> 3), msg); \
+ if (len % 8) { \
+ _last_byte_bits = len % 8; \
+ _last_byte_mask = ~((1 << (8 - _last_byte_bits)) - 1); \
+ _last_byte_a = ((const uint8_t *)a)[len >> 3]; \
+ _last_byte_b = ((const uint8_t *)b)[len >> 3]; \
+ _last_byte_a &= _last_byte_mask; \
+ _last_byte_b &= _last_byte_mask; \
+ if (_last_byte_a != _last_byte_b) { \
+ printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: " \
+ msg "\n", __func__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__);\
+ TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
+ return TEST_FAILED; \
+ } \
+ } \
+} while (0)
+
+/* Compare two buffers with offset (length and offset in bits) */
+#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_BIT_OFFSET(a, b, len, off, msg, ...) do { \
+ uint8_t _first_byte_a, _first_byte_b; \
+ uint8_t _first_byte_mask, _first_byte_bits; \
+ uint32_t _len_without_first_byte = (off % 8) ? \
+ len - (8 - (off % 8)) : \
+ len; \
+ uint32_t _off_in_bytes = (off % 8) ? (off >> 3) + 1 : (off >> 3); \
+ const uint8_t *_a_with_off = (const uint8_t *)a + _off_in_bytes; \
+ const uint8_t *_b_with_off = (const uint8_t *)b + _off_in_bytes; \
+ TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL_BIT(_a_with_off, _b_with_off, \
+ _len_without_first_byte, msg); \
+ if (off % 8) { \
+ _first_byte_bits = 8 - (off % 8); \
+ _first_byte_mask = (1 << _first_byte_bits) - 1; \
+ _first_byte_a = *(_a_with_off - 1); \
+ _first_byte_b = *(_b_with_off - 1); \
+ _first_byte_a &= _first_byte_mask; \
+ _first_byte_b &= _first_byte_mask; \
+ if (_first_byte_a != _first_byte_b) { \
+ printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: " \
+ msg "\n", __func__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
+ return TEST_FAILED; \
+ } \
+ } \
+} while (0)
#define TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(a, b, msg, ...) do { \
if (!(a != b)) { \
--
2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-17 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1462541340-11839-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
2016-06-17 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add new KASUMI SW PMD Pablo de Lara
2016-06-17 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] kasumi: add new KASUMI PMD Pablo de Lara
2016-06-17 10:32 ` Pablo de Lara [this message]
2016-06-17 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] test: add unit tests for " Pablo de Lara
2016-06-17 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add new KASUMI SW PMD Jain, Deepak K
2016-06-20 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Pablo de Lara
2016-06-20 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] kasumi: add new KASUMI PMD Pablo de Lara
2016-06-20 19:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-20 19:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-23 7:37 ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2016-07-06 11:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-06 13:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-06 13:22 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-06-20 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] test: add new buffer comparison macros Pablo de Lara
2016-06-20 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test: add unit tests for KASUMI PMD Pablo de Lara
2016-06-20 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add new KASUMI SW PMD Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466159565-27950-3-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).