DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sekhar, Ashwin" <Ashwin.Sekhar@cavium.com>
To: "Jacob,  Jerin" <Jerin.JacobKollanukkaran@cavium.com>
Cc: "john.mcnamara@intel.com" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"halayli@gmail.com" <halayli@gmail.com>,
	"jianbo.liu@linaro.org" <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 09:00:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495098040.3692.3.camel@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170518085504.GA13709@jerin>

On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 14:25 +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> > 
> > Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 00:34:26 -0700
> > From: Ashwin Sekhar T K <ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com>
> > To: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com,
> >  jianbo.liu@linaro.org
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ashwin Sekhar T K <ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.c
> > om>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add
> > arm64
> >  support
> > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.2
> > 
> > Updated Makefile to allow compilation for arm64 architecture.
> > 
> > Added necessary arm64 support for lthread.
> > 
> > Fixed minor compilation errors for arm64 compilation.
> > 
> > Tested the apps l3fwd-thread and lthread_pthread_shim on thunderx
> > and x86_64.
> > 
> > +void
> > +ctx_switch(struct ctx *new_ctx __rte_unused, struct ctx *curr_ctx
> > __rte_unused)
> > +{
> > +	/* SAVE CURRENT CONTEXT */
> > +	asm volatile (
> > +			/* Save SP */
> > +			"mov x3, sp\n"
> > +			"str x3, [x1, #0]\n"
> > +
> > +			/* Save FP and LR */
> > +			"stp x29, x30, [x1, #8]\n"
> > +
> > +			/* Save Callee Saved Regs x19 - x28 */
> > +			"stp x19, x20, [x1, #24]\n"
> > +			"stp x21, x22, [x1, #40]\n"
> > +			"stp x23, x24, [x1, #56]\n"
> > +			"stp x25, x26, [x1, #72]\n"
> > +			"stp x27, x28, [x1, #88]\n"
> > +		     );
> IMO, We need to save SIMD registers in the context as well.
> x86 code also not doing that, looks like it is an obvious bug in x86
> code as
> well.
> 
Yes. You are correct. Need to save the bottom 64-bits of called saved
ASIMD regs v8-v15. Will update the patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-18  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 18:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-17 18:44 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-18  6:35   ` Jianbo Liu
2017-05-18  7:38     ` Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-05-18  7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18  7:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18  7:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18  8:55     ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-18  9:00       ` Sekhar, Ashwin [this message]
2017-05-18 10:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18 10:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18 10:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-03 20:57     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-03 21:21       ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2017-07-04  7:37         ` Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-07-04 14:02           ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2017-07-04  8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04  8:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04  8:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04  8:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04  8:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04  8:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04 13:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495098040.3692.3.camel@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ashwin.sekhar@cavium.com \
    --cc=Jerin.JacobKollanukkaran@cavium.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=halayli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jianbo.liu@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).