DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, gage.eads@intel.com,
	Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] event/sw: fix credit tracking in port dequeue
Date: Thu,  1 Jun 2017 16:45:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496331954-93915-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E01EC4180@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com>

Single-link optimized ports previously did not correctly track
credits when dequeued, and re-enqueued as a FORWARD type. This
could "inflate" the number of credits in the system.

A unit test is added to reproduce and verify the issue, and the
fixed implementation counts FORWARD packets, and reduces the
number of credits the port has if it is of single-link type.

Fixes: 656af9180014 ("event/sw: add worker core functions")

Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Acked-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>

---

v2:
- Remove useless stats retrieving code
- Remove commented code
- Added Ack

---
 drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_worker.c |  5 ++++
 test/test/test_eventdev_sw.c       | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_worker.c b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_worker.c
index 9cb6bef..b738506 100644
--- a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_worker.c
+++ b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_worker.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ sw_event_enqueue_burst(void *port, const struct rte_event ev[], uint16_t num)
 			return 0;
 	}
 
+	uint32_t forwards = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
 		int op = ev[i].op;
 		int outstanding = p->outstanding_releases > 0;
@@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ sw_event_enqueue_burst(void *port, const struct rte_event ev[], uint16_t num)
 		p->inflight_credits -= (op == RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW);
 		p->inflight_credits += (op == RTE_EVENT_OP_RELEASE) *
 					outstanding;
+		forwards += (op == RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD);
 
 		new_ops[i] = sw_qe_flag_map[op];
 		new_ops[i] &= ~(invalid_qid << QE_FLAG_VALID_SHIFT);
@@ -113,6 +115,9 @@ sw_event_enqueue_burst(void *port, const struct rte_event ev[], uint16_t num)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* handle directed port forward credits */
+	p->inflight_credits -= forwards * p->is_directed;
+
 	/* returns number of events actually enqueued */
 	uint32_t enq = qe_ring_enqueue_burst_with_ops(p->rx_worker_ring, ev, i,
 					     new_ops);
diff --git a/test/test/test_eventdev_sw.c b/test/test/test_eventdev_sw.c
index b187d02..2cb9f59 100644
--- a/test/test/test_eventdev_sw.c
+++ b/test/test/test_eventdev_sw.c
@@ -548,6 +548,50 @@ test_single_directed_packet(struct test *t)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int
+test_directed_forward_credits(struct test *t)
+{
+	uint32_t i;
+	int32_t err;
+
+	if (init(t, 1, 1) < 0 ||
+			create_ports(t, 1) < 0 ||
+			create_directed_qids(t, 1, t->port) < 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (rte_event_dev_start(evdev) < 0) {
+		printf("%d: Error with start call\n", __LINE__);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	struct rte_event ev = {
+			.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW,
+			.queue_id = 0,
+	};
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
+		err = rte_event_enqueue_burst(evdev, 0, &ev, 1);
+		if (err < 0) {
+			printf("%d: error failed to enqueue\n", __LINE__);
+			return -1;
+		}
+		rte_event_schedule(evdev);
+
+		uint32_t deq_pkts;
+		deq_pkts = rte_event_dequeue_burst(evdev, 0, &ev, 1, 0);
+		if (deq_pkts != 1) {
+			printf("%d: error failed to deq\n", __LINE__);
+			return -1;
+		}
+
+		/* re-write event to be a forward, and continue looping it */
+		ev.op = RTE_EVENT_OP_FORWARD;
+	}
+
+	cleanup(t);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 
 static int
 test_priority_directed(struct test *t)
@@ -3025,13 +3069,18 @@ test_sw_eventdev(void)
 		}
 	}
 	t->mbuf_pool = eventdev_func_mempool;
-
 	printf("*** Running Single Directed Packet test...\n");
 	ret = test_single_directed_packet(t);
 	if (ret != 0) {
 		printf("ERROR - Single Directed Packet test FAILED.\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
+	printf("*** Running Directed Forward Credit test...\n");
+	ret = test_directed_forward_credits(t);
+	if (ret != 0) {
+		printf("ERROR - Directed Forward Credit test FAILED.\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
 	printf("*** Running Single Load Balanced Packet test...\n");
 	ret = single_packet(t);
 	if (ret != 0) {
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-01 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-29 15:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Harry van Haaren
2017-05-30 14:11 ` Eads, Gage
2017-06-01 15:45   ` Harry van Haaren [this message]
2017-06-06  3:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1496331954-93915-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).