DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/1] eventdev: add distributed software (DSW) event device
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:24:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <149d3d33-8a54-715c-25f9-24612cc60d56@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180827094001.GA22264@jerin>

On 2018-08-27 11:40, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> On 2018-07-22 13:32, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>>
>>>> +static void
>>>> +dsw_stop(struct rte_eventdev *dev __rte_unused)
>>>> +{
>>>
>>> You may implement, eventdev_stop_flush_t callback to free up the
>>> outstanding events in the eventdev.
>>>
>>
>> Is this support mandatory, or is it OK to leave it to the user to empty
>> the machinery before calling stop in the initial driver version?
> 
> This is useful to avoid event buffer leak. The application may call stop()
> abruptly or some reason event device cannot provide the event on
> dequeue().
> 

I see it being useful.

I'll implement it.

> Any trivial implementation could be doing dequeue() in the driver on
> stop().
> 
>>
>> I can't find any other event device supporting the callback.
> 
> drivers/event/sw and drivers/event/octeontx/ supports it.
> 
> $ grep -r "dev_stop_flush" drivers/event/
> drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c:	if (dev->dev_ops->dev_stop_flush != NULL)
> drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c: dev->dev_ops->dev_stop_flush(dev->data->dev_id, event,
> dev->data->dev_stop_flush_arg);
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_selftest.c:dev_stop_flush(struct test *t) /*
> test to check we can properly flush events */
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_selftest.c:	if
> (rte_event_dev_stop_flush_callback_register(evdev, flush, &count)) {
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_selftest.c:	if
> (rte_event_dev_stop_flush_callback_register(evdev, NULL, NULL)) {
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_selftest.c:	ret = dev_stop_flush(t);
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c:	eventdev_stop_flush_t flush;
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c:	flush = dev->dev_ops->dev_stop_flush;
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c:	arg = dev->data->dev_stop_flush_arg;
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c:	eventdev_stop_flush_t flush;
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c:	flush = dev->dev_ops->dev_stop_flush;
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c:	arg = dev->data->dev_stop_flush_arg;
> 

I needed to rebase against master. Sorry.

>>
>> In DSW, the events can be a little here-and-there - in the output
>> buffers, in the pause buffer, and on the input rings.
> 
> Any trivial implementation could be doing dequeue() in the driver on
> stop().
> 

Sure, but how many times? One zero-dequeue is not enough. A migration 
might be in progress, and the signaling needs to finish before the 
events in the pause buffer is flushed to the destination in_ring.

I'll traverse the port-internal output/pause buffers instead.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-27 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180711210844.5467-1-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
     [not found] ` <20180711210844.5467-2-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
2018-07-22 11:32   ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-19  6:11     ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-23 13:08       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-08-23 13:44         ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-23 20:08           ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-08-27  9:23     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-08-27  9:40       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-27 10:24         ` Mattias Rönnblom [this message]
2018-07-11 21:21 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/1] A Distributed Software Event Device Mattias Rönnblom
2018-07-11 21:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/1] eventdev: add distributed software (DSW) event device Mattias Rönnblom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=149d3d33-8a54-715c-25f9-24612cc60d56@ericsson.com \
    --to=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).