DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
To: rsanford@akamai.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] doc: update timer lib docs
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:27:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503692879-16320-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503499644-29432-4-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>

This change updates the timer library documentation to
reflect a change to the organization of the skiplists
in the implementation.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
---
 doc/guides/prog_guide/timer_lib.rst | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/timer_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/timer_lib.rst
index f437417..f94ffaa 100644
--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/timer_lib.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/timer_lib.rst
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ..  BSD LICENSE
-    Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+    Copyright(c) 2010-2017 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
     All rights reserved.
 
     Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
@@ -53,16 +53,17 @@ Refer to the `callout manual <http://www.daemon-systems.org/man/callout.9.html>`
 Implementation Details
 ----------------------
 
-Timers are tracked on a per-lcore basis,
-with all pending timers for a core being maintained in order of timer expiry in a skiplist data structure.
-The skiplist used has ten levels and each entry in the table appears in each level with probability ¼^level.
+Timers are tracked in a per-lcore array of skiplist data structures; each
+lcore has one skiplist corresponding to each other lcore that could load a timer on it. All pending
+timers in each skiplist are maintained in order of timer expiry.
+Each skiplist has ten levels and each entry in the table appears in each level with probability ¼^level.
 This means that all entries are present in level 0, 1 in every 4 entries is present at level 1,
 one in every 16 at level 2 and so on up to level 9.
 This means that adding and removing entries from the timer list for a core can be done in log(n) time,
 up to 4^10 entries, that is, approximately 1,000,000 timers per lcore.
 
 A timer structure contains a special field called status,
-which is a union of a timer state (stopped, pending, running, config) and an owner (lcore id).
+which is a union of a timer state (stopped, pending, running, config), an installer (lcore id), and an owner (lcore id).
 Depending on the timer state, we know if a timer is present in a list or not:
 
 *   STOPPED: no owner, not in a list
@@ -77,17 +78,17 @@ Resetting or stopping a timer while it is in a CONFIG or RUNNING state is not al
 When modifying the state of a timer,
 a Compare And Swap instruction should be used to guarantee that the status (state+owner) is modified atomically.
 
-Inside the rte_timer_manage() function,
-the skiplist is used as a regular list by iterating along the level 0 list, which contains all timer entries,
+Inside the rte_timer_manage() function, each of an lcore's skiplists is traversed in sequence.
+Each skiplist is used as a regular list by iterating along the level 0 list, which contains all timer entries,
 until an entry which has not yet expired has been encountered.
-To improve performance in the case where there are entries in the timer list but none of those timers have yet expired,
+To improve performance in the case where there are entries in a skiplist but none of those timers have yet expired,
 the expiry time of the first list entry is maintained within the per-core timer list structure itself.
 On 64-bit platforms, this value can be checked without the need to take a lock on the overall structure.
 (Since expiry times are maintained as 64-bit values,
 a check on the value cannot be done on 32-bit platforms without using either a compare-and-swap (CAS) instruction or using a lock,
 so this additional check is skipped in favor of checking as normal once the lock has been taken.)
 On both 64-bit and 32-bit platforms,
-a call to rte_timer_manage() returns without taking a lock in the case where the timer list for the calling core is empty.
+rte_timer_manage() can continue on to an lcore's next skiplist without taking a lock in the case where a timer list is empty.
 
 Use Cases
 ---------
-- 
2.6.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-25 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 14:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] *** timer library enhancements *** Gabriel Carrillo
2017-08-23 14:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] timer: add per-installer pending lists for each lcore Gabriel Carrillo
2017-08-25 20:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Gabriel Carrillo
2017-08-29 10:57     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-08-29 16:13       ` Carrillo, Erik G
2017-08-29 15:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Stephen Hemminger
2017-08-23 14:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] timer: handle timers installed from non-EAL threads Gabriel Carrillo
2017-08-25 20:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Gabriel Carrillo
2017-08-23 14:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] doc: update timer lib docs Gabriel Carrillo
2017-08-25 20:27   ` Gabriel Carrillo [this message]
2017-08-23 15:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] *** timer library enhancements *** Wiles, Keith
2017-08-23 16:19   ` Carrillo, Erik G
2017-08-23 16:50     ` Wiles, Keith
2017-08-23 19:28       ` Carrillo, Erik G
2017-08-23 21:04         ` Wiles, Keith
2017-08-24 14:08           ` Carrillo, Erik G
2017-08-25 20:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-13 22:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] timer library enhancement Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-13 22:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] timer: add multiple pending lists option for each lcore Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-13 22:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] timer: handle timers installed from non-EAL threads Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-13 22:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc: update timer lib docs Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-18 16:19       ` Mcnamara, John
2017-09-19 17:04         ` Carrillo, Erik G
2017-09-19 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] timer library enhancement Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-19 17:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] timer: add multiple pending lists option for each lcore Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-19 17:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] timer: handle timers installed from non-EAL threads Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-09-19 17:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] doc: update timer lib docs Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2017-10-11 20:42       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] timer library enhancement Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-04 22:42         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-05 21:53           ` Carrillo, Erik G

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503692879-16320-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --to=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=rsanford@akamai.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).