From: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow APIs removal error report
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:10:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513703415-29145-6-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513703415-29145-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
rte_eth_dev_is_removed API was added to detect a device removal
synchronously.
When a device removal occurs during flow command execution, many
different errors can be reported to the user.
Adjust all flow APIs error reports to return -EIO in case of device
removal using rte_eth_dev_is_removed API.
Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.c
index 6659063..be481ce 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.c
@@ -106,6 +106,18 @@ struct rte_flow_desc_data {
MK_FLOW_ACTION(VF, sizeof(struct rte_flow_action_vf)),
};
+static int
+flow_err(uint16_t port_id, int ret, struct rte_flow_error *error)
+{
+ if (ret == 0)
+ return 0;
+ if (rte_eth_dev_is_removed(port_id))
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EIO,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
+ NULL, rte_strerror(EIO));
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* Get generic flow operations structure from a port. */
const struct rte_flow_ops *
rte_flow_ops_get(uint16_t port_id, struct rte_flow_error *error)
@@ -144,7 +156,8 @@ struct rte_flow_desc_data {
if (unlikely(!ops))
return -rte_errno;
if (likely(!!ops->validate))
- return ops->validate(dev, attr, pattern, actions, error);
+ return flow_err(port_id, ops->validate(dev, attr, pattern,
+ actions, error), error);
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
@@ -159,12 +172,17 @@ struct rte_flow *
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
+ struct rte_flow *flow;
const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
if (unlikely(!ops))
return NULL;
- if (likely(!!ops->create))
- return ops->create(dev, attr, pattern, actions, error);
+ if (likely(!!ops->create)) {
+ flow = ops->create(dev, attr, pattern, actions, error);
+ if (flow == NULL)
+ flow_err(port_id, -rte_errno, error);
+ return flow;
+ }
rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
return NULL;
@@ -182,7 +200,8 @@ struct rte_flow *
if (unlikely(!ops))
return -rte_errno;
if (likely(!!ops->destroy))
- return ops->destroy(dev, flow, error);
+ return flow_err(port_id, ops->destroy(dev, flow, error),
+ error);
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
@@ -199,7 +218,7 @@ struct rte_flow *
if (unlikely(!ops))
return -rte_errno;
if (likely(!!ops->flush))
- return ops->flush(dev, error);
+ return flow_err(port_id, ops->flush(dev, error), error);
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
@@ -219,7 +238,8 @@ struct rte_flow *
if (!ops)
return -rte_errno;
if (likely(!!ops->query))
- return ops->query(dev, flow, action, data, error);
+ return flow_err(port_id, ops->query(dev, flow, action, data,
+ error), error);
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
@@ -237,7 +257,7 @@ struct rte_flow *
if (!ops)
return -rte_errno;
if (likely(!!ops->isolate))
- return ops->isolate(dev, set, error);
+ return flow_err(port_id, ops->isolate(dev, set, error), error);
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
index 47c88ea..180438f 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_flow.h
@@ -1237,6 +1237,8 @@ struct rte_flow_error {
*
* -ENOSYS: underlying device does not support this functionality.
*
+ * -EIO: underlying device is removed.
+ *
* -EINVAL: unknown or invalid rule specification.
*
* -ENOTSUP: valid but unsupported rule specification (e.g. partial
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-02 15:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Fail-safe fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/failsafe: " Matan Azrad
2017-11-06 8:19 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-11-02 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/mlx4: adjust removal error Matan Azrad
2017-11-03 13:05 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-05 6:52 ` Matan Azrad
2017-11-06 16:51 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-02 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2017-11-03 13:06 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-05 6:57 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fail-safe fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 14:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 15:16 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-13 15:48 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 16:09 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-13 17:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-14 10:40 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-13 21:55 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-14 10:40 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-14 10:48 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-14 13:07 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-14 13:27 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-14 14:43 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-19 17:24 ` Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 20:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 22:13 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-20 8:39 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-07 9:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-07 9:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 17:10 ` Matan Azrad [this message]
2018-01-07 9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19 17:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2017-12-19 22:21 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-20 10:58 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-08 10:57 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-08 12:55 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-08 13:46 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-08 14:00 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-08 14:31 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-10 12:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 12:43 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-10 13:51 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-10 13:47 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-17 20:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 8:44 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 17:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-18 17:57 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-18 18:02 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 16:59 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 16:59 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 17:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-18 18:10 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-19 16:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-19 17:35 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-01-19 17:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-19 18:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-19 18:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-20 19:04 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 20:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-20 20:45 ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-21 20:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 11:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/6] ethdev: add devop to check removal status Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] net/mlx4: support a device removal check operation Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] net/mlx5: " Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/6] ethdev: adjust APIs removal error report Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] ethdev: adjust flow " Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] net/failsafe: fix removed device handling Matan Azrad
2018-01-21 20:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] Fail-safe\ethdev: fix removal handling lack Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513703415-29145-6-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com \
--to=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).