DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process model
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:12:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16135200.seSVc815in@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483697780-12088-2-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>

2017-01-06 18:16, Yuanhan Liu:
> +static void
> +eth_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint8_t port_id, const char *name)
> +{
> +	eth_dev->data = &rte_eth_dev_data[port_id];
> +	eth_dev->attached = DEV_ATTACHED;
> +	eth_dev_last_created_port = port_id;
> +	nb_ports++;
> +
> +	if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> +		snprintf(eth_dev->data->name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name),
> +			 "%s", name);
> +		eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id;
> +	}

Why not keeping eth_dev->data filling in rte_eth_dev_allocate?

> +}
> +
>  struct rte_eth_dev *
>  rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name)
>  {
> @@ -211,12 +226,41 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
>  	}
>  
>  	eth_dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];

Why not moving this line in eth_dev_init?

> -	eth_dev->data = &rte_eth_dev_data[port_id];
> -	snprintf(eth_dev->data->name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name), "%s", name);
> -	eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id;
> -	eth_dev->attached = DEV_ATTACHED;
> -	eth_dev_last_created_port = port_id;
> -	nb_ports++;
> +	eth_dev_init(eth_dev, port_id, name);
> +
> +	return eth_dev;
> +}

[...]
> +/*
> + * Attach to a port already registered by the primary process, which
> + * makes sure that the same device would have the same port id both
> + * in the primary and secondary process.
> + */
> +static struct rte_eth_dev *
> +eth_dev_attach_secondary(const char *name)

OK, good description

[...]
> -	eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocate(ethdev_name);
> -	if (eth_dev == NULL)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> +		eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocate(ethdev_name);
> +		if (eth_dev == NULL)
> +			return -ENOMEM;

You could merge here the rest of primary init below.

> +	} else {
> +		eth_dev = eth_dev_attach_secondary(ethdev_name);
> +		if (eth_dev == NULL) {
> +			/*
> +			 * if we failed to attach a device, it means
> +			 * the device is skipped, due to some errors.
> +			 * Take virtio-net device as example, it could
> +			 * due to the device is managed by virtio-net
> +			 * kernel driver.  For such case, we return a
> +			 * positive value, to let EAL skip it as well.
> +			 */

I'm not sure we need an example here.
Is the virtio case special?

nit: "it could due" looks to be a typo

> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
>  		eth_dev->data->dev_private = rte_zmalloc("ethdev private structure",

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-06 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-22  7:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/virtio: a temp to fix few multiple process issues Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-22  7:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio: fix crash for secondary process Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-22  7:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/virtio: fix multiple process support Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-22  7:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for secondary process Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-22  7:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/virtio: a temp to fix few multiple process issues Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-22  8:29 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-12-28 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] net/virtio: fix several " Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process model Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-04 17:34     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-05  6:25       ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for secondary process Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] net/virtio: store PCI operators pointer locally Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] net/virtio: store IO port info locally Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] net/virtio: fix multiple process support Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:14     ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] net/virtio: remove dead structure field Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 10:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] net/virtio: fix several multiple process issues Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process model Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 13:12       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-01-06 14:19         ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-09  7:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-09 17:08         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-10 14:33           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-11 13:32             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-12  3:10               ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-19 18:39         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-20  7:58           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for secondary process Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-08 23:15       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-09  5:19         ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-09  8:02           ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-01-09  8:05             ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] net/virtio: store PCI operators pointer locally Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] net/virtio: store IO port info locally Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] net/virtio: fix multiple process support Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] net/virtio: remove dead structure field Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-12  6:02       ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16135200.seSVc815in@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).