DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/failsafe: replace local sub-device with shared data
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 18:58:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <172443910.dRk5910QrU@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190305173825.2ho27gqfx7f72xqb@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>

Hi,

05/03/2019 18:38, Gaëtan Rivet:
> >  fs_dev_remove(struct sub_device *sdev)
[...]
> > -		rte_eth_dev_close(PORT_ID(sdev));
> > +		rte_eth_dev_close(edev->data->port_id);
> 
> Ok I see. I missed that during the first reading, the private_data is
> zeroed on dev_close(), so ETH(sdev) becomes invalid here.

I don't follow you. What do you mean with this comment?

> What happens when a primary process closes a device before a secondary?
> Is the secondary unable to stop / close its own then? Isn't there some
> missing uninit?

Is the secondary process supposed to do any closing?
The device management should be done only by the primary process.

Note: anyway all this hotplug related code should be dropped
from failsafe to be replaced by EAL hotplug management.

> This seems dangerous to me. Why not instead allocating a per-process
> slab of memory that would hold the relevant references and outlive the
> shared data (a per-process rte_eth_dev private data...).

Which data do you think should be allocated per process?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-05 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-05  9:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/failsafe: replace local device " Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-05  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/failsafe: change back-reference from sub-device Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-05 16:48   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-07  9:01     ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-07  9:43       ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-05  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/failsafe: replace local sub-device with shared data Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-05  9:59   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-05 17:38   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-05 17:58     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-03-06 10:46       ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-06 18:02         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-07  8:43           ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-07  9:47             ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-07 11:34               ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-07 11:50                 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-05  9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-05 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/failsafe: replace local device with shared data Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-05 17:40   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-05 17:41     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-18 16:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] support secondary process for failsafe Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05   ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/failsafe: replace local device with shared data Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05     ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/failsafe: change back-reference from sub-device Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05     ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/failsafe: replace sub-device pointer with port id Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05     ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:05     ` Raslan Darawsheh
2019-03-18 16:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] support secondary process for failsafe Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-18 16:16     ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-03-27 14:08     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-27 14:08       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=172443910.dRk5910QrU@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).