From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] mbuf: fix of enabling all newly added RX error flags
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:26:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17296025.Gs0n2xkUhX@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A7D086F@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2014-12-10 13:50, Zhang, Helin:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:35 PM
> > To: Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] mbuf: fix of enabling all newly added RX
> > error flags
> >
> > 2014-12-10 16:55, Helin Zhang:
> > > Before redefining mbuf structure, there was lack of free bits in 'ol_flags'
> > > (32 bits in total) for new RX or TX flags. So it tried to reuse
> > > existant bits as most as possible, or even assigning 0 to some of bit
> > > flags. After new mbuf structure defined, there are quite a lot of free
> > > bits. So those newly added bit flags should be assigned with correct
> > > and valid bit values, and getting their names should be enabled as
> > > well. Note that 'RECIP' should be removed, as nowhere uses it.
> > > 'PKT_RX_ERR' is defined to replace all other error bit flags, e.g. MAC error,
> > Oversize error, header buffer overflow error.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 7 ++-----
> > > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 9 +++------
> > > lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 37
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > v2 changes:
> > > * Removed error flag of 'ECIPE' processing only in both i40e PMD and mbuf.
> > All
> > > other error flags were added back.
> > > * Assigned error flags with correct and valid values, as their previous values
> > > were invalid.
> > > * Enabled getting all error flag names.
> > >
> > > v3 changes:
> > > * 'PKT_RX_ERR' is defined to replace error bit flags of MAC error, Oversize
> > > error, header buffer overflow error.
> > > * Removed assigning values to PKT_TX_* bit flags, as it has already been
> > done
> > > in another packet set.
> > >
> > > v4 changes:
> > > * Renamed 'PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD' to 'PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_BAD'.
> > > * Fixed the bug of checking error bits of 'Descriptor oversize' and
> > > 'Header buffer oversize'.
> > > * Added debug logs for each RX error.
> > [...]
> > > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > > @@ -83,12 +83,7 @@ extern "C" {
> > > #define PKT_RX_RSS_HASH (1ULL << 1) /**< RX packet with RSS
> > hash result. */
> > > #define PKT_RX_FDIR (1ULL << 2) /**< RX packet with FDIR
> > match indicate. */
> > > #define PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD (1ULL << 3) /**< L4 cksum of RX pkt.
> > is
> > > not OK. */ -#define PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD (1ULL << 4) /**< IP cksum of
> > > RX pkt. is not OK. */ -#define PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD (0ULL << 0) /**<
> > External IP header checksum error. */
> > > -#define PKT_RX_OVERSIZE (0ULL << 0) /**< Num of desc of an RX
> > pkt oversize. */
> > > -#define PKT_RX_HBUF_OVERFLOW (0ULL << 0) /**< Header buffer
> > overflow. */
> > > -#define PKT_RX_RECIP_ERR (0ULL << 0) /**< Hardware processing
> > error. */
> > > -#define PKT_RX_MAC_ERR (0ULL << 0) /**< MAC error. */
> > > +#define PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD (1ULL << 4) /**< IP (or inner IP)
> > > +header checksum error. */
> >
> > It can be also an outer IP header in case the device don't support tunneling or is
> > not configured to detect it.
>
> For non-tunneling case, no outer/inner at all, it just has the IP header. The bit flag
> indicates the IP header checksum error.
> For tunneling case, this bit flag indicates the inner IP header checksum error, another
> one for outer IP header checksum error.
> So I don't think this bit can be treated as outer.
I think you didn't understand my comment.
I talk about NICs which don't have tunneling support.
In this case, the outer IP header is seen as a simple IP header.
So, depending on which port is receiving a tunneled packet, this
flag or the dedicated one can be used for outer IP checksum.
I just suggest to remove the part "(or inner IP)" of the comment.
Do you agree?
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 6:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: Use one bit flag for all hardware detected RX packet errors Helin Zhang
2014-11-26 10:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 11:22 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-26 13:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 14:12 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-28 8:07 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-11-28 8:47 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-01 1:57 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-01 9:58 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 7:25 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-05 1:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] fix of enabling all newly added error flags Helin Zhang
2014-12-05 1:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] i40e: remove checking rxd flag which is not public Helin Zhang
2014-12-05 1:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: assign valid bit values for some RX and TX flags Helin Zhang
2014-12-05 10:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-06 0:42 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-06 1:07 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-08 10:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-09 2:29 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-06 1:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix of enabling all newly added RX error flags Helin Zhang
2014-12-08 10:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-09 2:23 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-08 10:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-09 2:14 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-09 6:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-10 8:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Helin Zhang
2014-12-10 9:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-10 13:50 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-10 15:26 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2014-12-10 22:29 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-11 11:16 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-12 1:27 ` Zhang, Helin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17296025.Gs0n2xkUhX@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).